Same tired responses by the incredible failures known as the
"scientific experts" by the mainstream media. In science, if something
does not work, it is wrong. The "HIV/AIDS" hypothesis is incorrect on
every level, yet they blame a "wiley virus," which is actually just an
effect of cellular level damage. Even real viruses considered
dangerous kill indirectly (as the 1918 pandemic killed by a powerful
inflammatory response, which explains why the young, healthy, and
active were killed off in greater numbers - if it was just the virus,
the old and infirm would have been killed in greater numbers). Read
the virus literature (stuff written by just about anyone but Gallo) and
you will see for yourself. The "HIV/AIDS" claims are good for a laugh,
but when people are being killed off by "medicine" it only generates so
much humor. "AIDS" can be very well explained by alternative
hypotheses, while "HIV/AIDS" has never even been stated as a formal
scientific hypothesis. Too much antigenic exposure, especially iwith
accompanying immunosuppressive factors (corticosteriods, antibiotics,
AA overload, oxidative stress, excess iron, PGE2 in semen, etc.) will
cause the shift that leads to the low CD4 levels and then "immune
system failure." The literature is clear on this point down to the
molecular level. But at this point too many reputations, too much
profit, too much emotional energy, etc., have been placed upon the back
on the "wiley retrovirus" for things to change anytime soon.
DavidT - 05 Jun 2006 18:49 GMT
Hmm, lets see........
Taking it from when the agent was identified...
23 years of HIV
112 years of TB
89 years of leprosy
50 years of Herpes
60 years of EBV
100+ years of pneumocystis
30 years of cryptosporidum
17 years of Hep C
etc etc etc........
This list of viruses/organisms without an effective vaccine having been
developed so far is huge.
What's your point?