Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

errors in Celia Farber's march 2006 article in harper's magazine

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Don Saklad - 01 Jun 2006 15:24 GMT
"errors in Celia Farber's march 2006 article in harper's magazine"
http://tinyurl.com/nt9b6

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22errors+in+Celia+Farber%27s+march+2006+ar
ticle+in+harper%27s+magazine%22&btnG=Google+Search

wilyretrovirus - 01 Jun 2006 23:48 GMT
It's been three months now.

She WON, get over it!
Brian Mailman - 02 Jun 2006 01:17 GMT
> It's been three months now.
>
> She WON

Too bad.  I voted for McPhee.

B/
Chris Noble - 02 Jun 2006 05:42 GMT
> It's been three months now.
>
> She WON, get over it!

She WON what?

Chris Noble
monty1945@lycos.com - 02 Jun 2006 05:50 GMT
Let's face it, anyone who wants different takes on various "diseases"
knows enough to do some internet research.  Those who don't want to
consider the possibility that the "HIV/AIDS" claims are wrong will have
to pay with their lives, as they have been for a couple of decades now.
Farber's article is a drop in the ocean either way, though some people
may grant it more credibility because they can phsyically hold the
magazine in their hands.
Chris Noble - 02 Jun 2006 07:24 GMT
> Let's face it, anyone who wants different takes on various "diseases"
> knows enough to do some internet research.

And, anyone who wants different take on "gravity"  knows enough to do
some internet research. The internet is full of pseudoscientific tripe.

> Those who don't want to
> consider the possibility that the "HIV/AIDS" claims are wrong will have
> to pay with their lives, as they have been for a couple of decades now.
>  Farber's article is a drop in the ocean either way, though some people
> may grant it more credibility because they can phsyically hold the
> magazine in their hands.

Duesberg and other "dissidents" have failed in the standard scientific
method. They now rely on books targetted at lay audiences, fancy
websites and opinion pieces from journalists with more opinions than
scientific knowledge.

Chris Noble
GMCarter - 02 Jun 2006 11:04 GMT
>It's been three months now.
>
>She WON, get over it!

She did, eh? Just like David Pasquarelli?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.