> Let's face it, anyone who wants different takes on various "diseases"
> knows enough to do some internet research.
And, anyone who wants different take on "gravity" knows enough to do
some internet research. The internet is full of pseudoscientific tripe.
> Those who don't want to
> consider the possibility that the "HIV/AIDS" claims are wrong will have
> to pay with their lives, as they have been for a couple of decades now.
> Farber's article is a drop in the ocean either way, though some people
> may grant it more credibility because they can phsyically hold the
> magazine in their hands.
Duesberg and other "dissidents" have failed in the standard scientific
method. They now rely on books targetted at lay audiences, fancy
websites and opinion pieces from journalists with more opinions than
scientific knowledge.
Chris Noble