> > > > Monty I've been taking AZT twice a day for over ten years what do you hope
> > > > to prove by a short 4 year trial?????
> > > > Gary Stein
> > > My guess is that the Denialists would in monty's words "simply make up
> > > a new, unscientific excuse, or
> > > regurgitate one of the old ones" for your continued health despite
> > > taking AZT.
> > > You must be particularly strong to survive AZT. Most people would be
> > > dead by now.
> > > Or, you'll get the same treatment that Magic Johnson gets. You must be
> > > lying. You are a paid shill of the pharmaceutical companies.
> > > I also expect that if Duesberg ever does infect himself with a virulent
> > > strain of HIV and if he does progress to AIDS and die from an
> > > AIDS-related opportunistic infection the Denialists will get Al-Bayati
> > > to write a "coroner's report" claiming that he really died from an
> > > allergic reaction to some medication.
> > > Chris Noble
> > It seems to me that Al-Bayati is being portrayed as a clown and his
> > report as a farce. The following does not support that view:
> > http://www.justiceforej.com/
> > ~ Dear Ms. Maggiore:
> > ~ As a Professor of Pathology at the University of Illinois at
> > ~ Chicago, one of the nation's largest medical schools, I analyze
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > ~ malpractice and fraud, and certainly less medical error in
> > ~ autopsies, diagnosis, treatment, and critical care practices.
> > ~ I would only emphasize what Dr. Al Bayati developed quite
> > ~ adequately from a technical standpoint in noting how the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > ~ in the published literature, is without scientific basis since
> > ~ positive staining can also be found in normal tissues and contexts.
> > ~ I believe Al-Bayati's analysis and report represents the state of
> > ~ the art in terms of methodology, completeness, and accuracy, and
> > ~ serves as a textbook model of how to conduct a differential
> > ~ diagnosis.
> > ~ Andrew Maniotis, PhD.
> > ~ Professor of Pathology and
> > ~ Program Director in the Cell and Developmental Biology of Cancer,
> > ~ Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, and Bioengineering,
> > ~ University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
> Dr Maniotis is a long time HIV "skeptic". He is a co-author of Perth
> Group articles.
> He is also on the advisory board of Maggiore's Alive and Well group.
> http://www.aliveandwell.org/html/top_bar_pages/aboutus.html
> Note Maniotis like Al-Bayati is not a a clinical pathologist. He is not
> licenced to perform autopsies or act as a clinical pathologist.
This is a lot about what these people aren't, while ignoring what
they are. You are obviously like to appeal to authority, yet in
doing so, you dismiss with the wave of a hand the opinion from of
a professor of pathology, on a matter of pathology. Al-Bayati's
(the clown) credentials you even more enthusiastically dismiss.
Let's look at them:
SQ:
====================================================================
Education
1994 Diplomate, American Board of Toxicology (DABT)
Al-Bayati was certified by the American Board of
Toxicology in the areas of Human, experimental,
regulatory and environmental toxicology).
1989 University of California, Davis PhD in Comparative
Pathology
Al-Bayati received a PhD in Comparative Pathology from UC
Davis after studies including human pathology, medical
immunology, medicalbiochemistry, analytical toxicology,
environmental toxicology and experimental toxicology.
1985 PhD Qualifying Exam
Al-Bayati entered the UC Davis PhD program after being
examined by two MD pathologists from the universitys
medical school. He passed on the first try.
====================================================================
EQ:
Interestingly, it appears a coroner doesn't need to be a pathologist:
http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/chain_1127620494.shtml
~ Something a lot of people don't know is that a "coroner" is actually
~ a political position, usually appointed, and most coroners are not
~ pathologists or even physicians. Rather, pathologists work for the
~ coroner's office, and are generally referred to as the Medical
~ Examiners. So was it Anthony Hernandez (the head of the Coroner's
~ office), Lakshmanan Sathyavagiswaran (the actual chief medical
~ examiner), or who exactly that came up with this? Was it merely a
~ political assertion or belief? If it was medical, what was the basis?
> None of this means that Al-Bayati is necessarily a clown.
Token and false generosity that dismisses the credentials he does have.
> I base my opinion on the riduclous things Al-Bayati claims.
> In this interview
> http://clients.loudeye.com/imc/brisbaneimc/mohammed_al-bayatipt2.mp3
> Al-Bayati gives his alternate view on the causal link between nitrite
> or pooper use and kaposi's sarcoma.
> Abuse of "poppers" causes headaches.
> Take aspirin for headaches.
> Aspirin causes thrombocytopenia.
> Presribed corticosteroids for thrombocytopenia.
> Corticosteroids causes AIDS and KS.
> This is whay I would call him a clown.
> He comes up with wild inventive
> and totally incredible explanations.
It is telling that nowhere have you afforded him or his report
any credibility at all. How is it that medical reviewers don't
find him and his report as laughable as you would have them?
>From the previous link:
~ Al-Bayatis report has been selected for publication in Medical
~ Veritas, a peer-reviewed medical journal. The review board of
~ this journal includes more than 20 physicians and scientists,
~ none of whom have any association with the Maggiore-Scovill
~ family or Alive & Well AIDS Alternatives. A copy of the paper is
~ available here, with the permission of the publisher.
That's regarding the report. But what other silly things has
Al-Bayati been up to? Continuing from that page - I have not
included the list of publications:
~ Some of Dr. Al-Bayatis most relevant publications are listed
~ below. A complete list of his scientific publications since
~ 1982 can be found on the National Library of Medicines PubMed
~ website. Apart from the references below indicating his experience
~ with unusual deaths of infants (often blamed on parents by doctors
~ and police),
Yes, the police have been dedicatedly sniffing around trying to nail
Christine Maggiore. A neighbour of hers complained that they were
asking so many questions about HIV tests and AIDS medications that
she thought they must have mistaken her for a doctor or a scientist.
She said they behaved more like they were from the HIVPD than the LAPD.
They even tried to alienate that neighbour against Christene Maggiore,
asking questions like, "If you were an HIV positive mother, wouldn't
you test your children?".
In a way it is comforting to know that police in the US are as
bright as they are down here. Anyway, continuing with Al-Bayati's
credentials:
~ Al-Bayati was the first researcher who reported pathologic changes
~ in thymus and lymph nodes in experimental animals exposed to high
~ levels of the pollutant Vanadium. He also discovered that the
~ compound vanadate can cause renal fibrosis (kidney damage). This
~ work is another clear indication of Al-Bayatis skill reading
~ pathology slides in all organs and his evaluation of hematology data
~ as well as his expertise in pathology and toxicology.
Now regarding that MP3 interview that you linked, due to his heavy
accent, I had considerable difficulty understanding what Al-Bayati
was saying and tried unsuccessfully to find a transcription of it.
The way you have presented it, one could get the impression that he
was presenting an exclusive mechanism. Listening to other parts of
the interview and reading his submissions as published in the British
Medical Journal, I don't believe that this is the case. For instance,
he also talks about the role of alcohol, cocaine, AZT, protease
inhibitors and heroin.
But what is pertinent is that you were mocking his report on Eliza's
death. What in it did you find ridiculous? Here is that report:
http://www.justiceforej.com/ej-medveritas.pdf
Perhaps more importantly, what did you find so contrastingly
consistent, erudite and convincing about the coroner's finding of
AIDS related pneumonia? Additionally, I ask the following:
(i) Does an apparently healthy child, getting sick and then
dying within three weeks - with only an ear infection except for the
last two days - describe the normal progression for HIV -> AIDS ->
death?
(ii) Why is it that none of the several other doctors and physicians
were able to find pneumonia - let alone AIDS related pneumonia? Is
pneumonia that hard to detect?
(iii) Was a blood sample taken? Did it test HIV+ ?
(iv) Why was the body released to the mortuary with no finding of the
cause of death?
(v) Why, after a month, was there still no finding for the cause of
death? How can that be? After all, you are all so certain here,
because it's so obvious, right?
(vi) Why is it that it was only after three further months, after the
coroner angrily found out about the mother testing mother testing HIV
positive (later testing negative), that AIDS related pneumonia was
determined as the cause of death?
Chris, I don't think this sad matter will ever go to before a court.
HIV/AIDS has too much to lose. Trial by media is a much safer option.
AIDS lobbyists would do well to hope that it stays there.
Best Regards,
Sean McHugh
-
Chris Noble - 08 Apr 2006 08:52 GMT
> > > > > Monty I've been taking AZT twice a day for over ten years what do you hope
> > > > > to prove by a short 4 year trial?????
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
> (the clown) credentials you even more enthusiastically dismiss.
> Let's look at them:
I am not appealing to authority. You are the one doing that.
http://www.mercola.com/2001/jul/11/aids.htm
"Dr. Al-Bayati: My investigation was focused on finding the causes of
AIDS and the link between HIV and AIDS. When I found that HIV is not
the cause of AIDS, then the issue of the HIV test became unimportant.
In fact, I have found that the majority of people who participated in
the major four AZT clinical trials that were conducted in the USA
between 1986-1992 were HIV-negative prior to their treatment with AZT
and their diagnoses were based only on clinical symptoms."
"The four published clinical trials are (1) Fischl et al., The New
England Journal of Medicine 317 (4): 185-191 (1987); (2) Fischl et
al.,
The New England Journal of Medicine 323 (15): 1009-1014 (1990); (3)
Volberding et al., The New England Journal of Medicine 322 (14):
941-949 (1990); and (4) Hamilton et al., The New England Journal of
Medicine 326(7): 437-443 (1992). Briefly, a total of 2,482 patients
participated in these studies, and only 22% were HIV-positive prior to
their treatment with AZT and the rest of the subjects were
HIV-negative
(62%) and untested (16%)."
This is the main evidence that he presents to support his idea that HIV
does not cause AIDS.
I went and read all four papers. Guess what I found.
All patients in these studies were HIV positive. It states this clearly
in the text of the articles. Anyone can go to the library and read
them. Al-Bayati simply lies about them. He repeats this lie in the book
that he sells.
> SQ:
> ====================================================================
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
> any credibility at all. How is it that medical reviewers don't
> find him and his report as laughable as you would have them?
Which medical reviewers are you talking about?
The only people that I have seen taking himseriously are HIV
"rethinkers" , anti-vaccionationists, and shaken-baby "rethinkers".
> >From the previous link:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Al-Bayati been up to? Continuing from that page - I have not
> included the list of publications:
Have you looked at this Medical Veritas journal? Have you read the
titles of some of the papers. Do you notice a difference bewteen this
journal and say the Lancet or the BMJ.
> ~ Some of Dr. Al-Bayati's most relevant publications are listed
> ~ below. A complete list of his scientific publications since
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> he also talks about the role of alcohol, cocaine, AZT, protease
> inhibitors and heroin.
I didn't have any trouble understanding what he said. It was just the
wild improbable chain of events that he invents that is ridiculous.
> But what is pertinent is that you were mocking his report on Eliza's
> death. What in it did you find ridiculous? Here is that report:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> last two days - describe the normal progression for HIV -> AIDS ->
> death?
There are conflicting reports about the health of the child. The
medical records show a pronounced failure to thrive after the age of
one. Babies weight's very considerably at birth but normally follow a
consistent curve. A baby with a birth weight in the 30 percentile will
normally follow this percentile as it grows. If the baby drops down to
the 5 percentile this indicates a possible problem.
Christine Maggiore is anti-western medicine. The fact that she took the
child to several doctors and ended up giving her antibiotics tells me
that the child was sicker than she makes out.
In addition, yes, this is a typical progression for HIV disease
particularly in children. The first sign, if CD4 counts are not
monitored, can be an opportunistic infection like PCP. If PCP is not
recognised and treated in a short period of time it is very often
fatal.
> (ii) Why is it that none of the several other doctors and physicians
> were able to find pneumonia - let alone AIDS related pneumonia? Is
> pneumonia that hard to detect?
It comes out that one of her own doctors suspected pneumonia at an
early stage. He also hinted that Maggiore was not being completely
honest about Eliza's health.
> (iii) Was a blood sample taken? Did it test HIV+ ?
Apparently a sample was available at some stage and sent for analysis.
I do not know if a conclusive result was obtained. P24 antigen testing
on brain samples was positive. Negative controls were used.
> (iv) Why was the body released to the mortuary with no finding of the
> cause of death?
Why not? Coroner's reports are often completed only after all tests are
in.
> (v) Why, after a month, was there still no finding for the cause of
> death? How can that be? After all, you are all so certain here,
> because it's so obvious, right?
How long does it take for a normal coroner's report?
> (vi) Why is it that it was only after three further months, after the
> coroner angrily found out about the mother testing mother testing HIV
> positive (later testing negative), that AIDS related pneumonia was
> determined as the cause of death?
How long does a normal coroner's report take?
> Chris, I don't think this sad matter will ever go to before a court.
> HIV/AIDS has too much to lose. Trial by media is a much safer option.
> AIDS lobbyists would do well to hope that it stays there.
You're starting to sound more and more like a conspiracy theorist.
"HIV/AIDS has too much to lose"?
Chris Noble
js - 08 Apr 2006 11:31 GMT
Le Sat, 08 Apr 2006 09:52:11 +0200, Chris Noble <ChrisJNoble@hotmail.com>
a écrit:
> You're starting to sound more and more like a conspiracy theorist.
> "HIV/AIDS has too much to lose"?
>
> Chris Noble
Noble ! I was worrying about you since you haven't answered my latest
posts. But I see you're still hangin' around spreading the sh.t.
Tell me, don't you really have nothing better to do than try to defend the
AID$ cause while referring to the death of Christine Maggiore's little
daughter? You guys remind me of a bunch a vultures.
Hey, I could use that image in my next letter to ACTUP NY, in case I write
a third one. Wolves, shotguns, vultures and AIDS apologists. Inspiration!!