Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

something's in the blood, if not HIV, what?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Death - 11 Feb 2006 18:19 GMT
WKMG-TV
February 1, 2006 12:31 PM

(HealthDay News) -- A blood safety program in South Africa led to a major decline in the
presence of AIDS-causing HIV in donated blood, a new study says.

The program included closing blood donor clinics in areas of high HIV prevalence, risk behavior
education for staff and donors, and blood donor interviews.

The findings appear in the Feb. 1 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

After the program was implemented, the prevalence of HIV in blood donations declined 50
percent, from 0.17 percent of donated blood in 1999-2000 to 0.08 percent in 2001-2002. The
reduction was attributed to a drop in intermediate (4.9 percent to 3.3 percent) and high-risk
(2.6 percent to 1.7 percent) donations, the study said.

The prevalence of HIV in first-time donors decreased by 45 percent, and donations from the
majority black population decreased from 6.6 percent to 4.2 percent, the South African National
Blood Service study found.

"In the long term, we believe that education of blood donors will be a key factor for ongoing
blood safety. There is a need for a structured program that is culturally attuned and presented
in the multiple languages in common use," the study authors wrote.

In an accompanying editorial, Robin Wood and Linda-Gail Bekker of the University of Cape Town
discuss the consequences of new blood safety policies in South Africa, where an estimated 5.3
million people (11.4 percent of the population) are infected with HIV.

"This crisis in South Africa highlights several ethical issues: the medical stigmatization of
population groups by excluding them from the blood donor pool; the use of race in medical
decision-making; and the relationship between public health medicine and society," they wrote.

"A further aspect highlighted by this controversy is the tendency of public health medicine to
ignore the societal roots of poor health in favor of medical interventions, which operate
further downstream. For example, it is easier to use more sophisticated screening technologies
than to address the underlying social inequalities."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice. You should
not use this information to diagnose or treat a health problem or disease without consulting
with a qualified healthcare provider. Please consult your healthcare provider with any
questions or concerns you may have regarding your condition.
Iconoclaster - 13 Feb 2006 23:30 GMT
I see a serious shortage of donor blood in the near future.  This blood is
always screened now for "HIV antibodies"  And as more and more people
start to realize that a serological test can destroy their lives, they
will avoid testing.  And rightfully so.
That's another thing you didn't foresee, right, health nazis?
Death - 14 Feb 2006 01:11 GMT
"Iconoclaster" <wgods@xs4all.nl> wrote in message

> I see a serious shortage of donor blood in the near future.

I see a clean supply of blood, now.

> This blood is always screened now for "HIV antibodies"

The number of HIV/AIDS cases from
tainted blood is the only number dropping, go figure.

> And as more and more people
> start to realize that a serological test can destroy their lives,

Their risky behavior had nothing to do with their plight.
Has to be the test results that destroyed their lives.

>they will avoid testing.

That is why the donor blood is tested. I have posted reports where
the donor was not notified of its infected status, the blood was
just pitched out with the trash.

> And rightfully so.

> That's another thing you didn't foresee, right, health nazis?

Odd you mention that. Quarantining aids/hiv infected people
20+ years ago would have saved many from HIV/AIDS related deaths
and untold millions of dollars.

A few observations I have made while visiting this group, overwhelmingly:

It is the infected that oppose testing for HIV/AIDS.

It is the infected that deny there is a deadly disease without
a cure being spread through behavior.

It is the infected that say the pharmaceutical company put them
at risk rather, yes, once again, their own behavior.

It seems to be a pattern of denial and lack of personal responsibility.
A liberal trait to be sure.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.