 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / January 2006What Happened with that Doctor
Dr. Robert E. Willner injected himself with the blood of a AIDS patient back in the early 90's. Does he have AIDS? He is supposed to have done this, but as far as I recall there was no independent evidence to show the material he injected was actually HIV-infected r from the verified HIV-positive source. Bottom line.... it was a scam He is supposed to have done this, but as far as I recall there was no independent evidence to show the material he injected was actually HIV-infected r from the verified HIV-positive source. Bottom line.... it was a scam It was a scam...as long as he didn't develop any "AIDS-related illnesses". You guys would be singing a different tune had that happened. > Dr. Robert E. Willner injected himself with the blood of a AIDS > patient back in the early 90's. > Does he have AIDS? He died of a heart attack a couple of years later, completely unrelated to his poking himself with a solid needle that has been previously used to poke a person who claimed to be HIV+. >> Dr. Robert E. Willner injected himself with the blood of a AIDS >> patient back in the early 90's. >> Does he have AIDS? > He died of a heart attack a couple of years later, > completely unrelated to his poking himself with a > solid needle that has been previously used to poke > a person who claimed to be HIV+. Are you sure it wasn't the ARV's? B/ "Are you sure it wasn't the ARV's?" ROTFLMAO! "Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message > Are you sure it wasn't the ARV's? why would Willner take them if he was attempting to prove a point, dah >"Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message >> >> Are you sure it wasn't the ARV's? >> >why would Willner take them if he was attempting to prove a point, dah It's funny because it's true > "Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message >> >> Are you sure it wasn't the ARV's? >> > why would Willner take them if he was attempting to prove a point, dah Lenin called, he wants his sense of humor back. B/ "Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message > > "Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message > >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Lenin called, he wants his sense of humor back. I guess that is one way to avoid Willner and your ignorant comment, change and/or avoid the topic. After all, it was your question, and I understand why you wish it wasn't. > "Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > After all, it was your question, and I understand why you wish > it wasn't. Wow, I never realized how completely.... stupid ... you are. B/ > > "Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message > > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Wow, I never realized how completely.... stupid ... you are. This is your second time to distance yourself from your ignorant question. Obviously you had no knowledge of the topic when you farted out your reply about Willner. >Wow, I never realized how completely.... stupid ... you are. A common problem with bigots. Reward centers are only fired when the "other" or different is suffering. Humor centers otherwise atrophied or dead. George M. Carter >>Wow, I never realized how completely.... stupid ... you are. > > A common problem with bigots. Reward centers are only fired when the > "other" or different is suffering. Humor centers otherwise atrophied > or dead. I found his portrait... http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SimplyMagic/TightFit.jpg >> Dr. Robert E. Willner injected himself with the blood of a AIDS >> patient back in the early 90's. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >solid needle that has been previously used to poke >a person who claimed to be HIV+. Oh, that's unfortunate as it would have been interesting to know the outcome. But then again, maybe it would not really prove anything anyway. Thanks for the update. >Oh, that's unfortunate as it would have been interesting to know the >outcome. But then again, maybe it would not really prove anything >anyway. Lots of people claimed that HIV doesn't cause AIDS who were documented to be HIV+. Most of them have died of AIDS. George M. Carter "Lots of people claimed that HIV doesn't cause AIDS who were documented to be HIV+. Most of them have died of AIDS." ..he says with girlish glee... >"Lots of people claimed that HIV doesn't cause AIDS who were documented >to be HIV+. Most of them have died of AIDS." > >..he says with girlish glee... Girlish maybe. Glee, not at all. I'll leave the freudenschade to you, dear. George M. Carter
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.