Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005  Bay Area Reporter

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Susie, age 9 - 16 Dec 2005 23:21 GMT
Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005  Bay Area Reporter
/

While all these deaths seem so mysterious, there
is little doubt that HIV treatment is among the
culprits in most cases. But the good news is that
nobody seems to be dying of AIDS.

My favorite of the week is #3, whose causes of
death jump right from the pages of the Antiviral
Side Effects Rap Sheet. At least this one had the
courage to admit the truth.

susie
-----
http://www.ebar.com/obituaries

1 Merle (Mark) Beyer

August 18, 1944 - November 6, 2005

Mark passed on a Sunday with his partner of 33 years,
Michael Anstadt, at his side. Mark was 61
A special thank-you to Dr. Amy Tezza, M.D. of Kaiser
for all of your years of support.

2 Luis Cesar Cabrera (Lola Lust)

October 19, 1953 - November 21, 2005

Luis died at home in the early hours of November 21st. Luis
was fondly known in the Gay Community

3 Michael 'Lurch' Sutton

Lurch died December 8th of an apparent heart attack, after a
long struggle with cardiac problems, complications of
diabetes, and HIV. He was 55.

4 Edward Costa, Jr.

went home to the Lord on Saturday, December 10, 2005, in San
Leandro, California. He was 59. He was also a member and
participant in various organizations in the Bay Area.

5 Daniel Taylor

My gentle friend, "Daniel," passed in Utah on October 26,
2005, with his father and family, and services were held
shortly thereafter.

6 Charles Allen Wolfe

1949 - 2005

Charlie Wolfe, 10-year San Francisco resident and visual
artist, died peacefully at Davies hospital on Tuesday,
December 6


wilyretrovirus - 16 Dec 2005 23:47 GMT
Thanks, Susie,

hopefully, it won't be too long before we ALL realize that this is nothing
short of chemically-induced genocide.  
wilyretrovirus - 16 Dec 2005 23:50 GMT
Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005  Bay Area Reporter
/

While all these deaths seem so mysterious, there
is little doubt that HIV treatment is among the
culprits in most cases. But the good news is that
nobody seems to be dying of AIDS.

My favorite of the week is #3, whose causes of
death jump right from the pages of the Antiviral
Side Effects Rap Sheet. At least this one had the
courage to admit the truth.

Thanks, Susie,

hopefully, it won't be too long before we ALL realize that this is
nothing
short of chemically-induced genocide.  
Seamore Tush - 17 Dec 2005 17:31 GMT
wilyretrovirus wrote...
> Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005  Bay Area Reporter
> /
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> culprits in most cases. But the good news is that
> nobody seems to be dying of AIDS.

Why is that good news?  Remember that the longer they live
the more people they infect.  The nice thing about AIDS is
that its symptoms are visible, there is no missing the
oozing, festering skin sores or that skeletal zombie look
in their face.  While they surely will still attract some
sexual partners, most potential partners will avoid them.
Susie, age 9 - 18 Dec 2005 23:33 GMT
> wilyretrovirus wrote...
>> Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005  Bay Area Reporter
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Why is that good news?  Remember that the longer they live
> the more people they infect.

So what? If infected people aren't getting AIDS,
then what's the problem?

> The nice thing about AIDS is
> that its symptoms are visible, there is no missing the
> oozing, festering skin sores or that skeletal zombie look
> in their face.  While they surely will still attract some
> sexual partners, most potential partners will avoid them.

Haven't you heard? The drugs have fixed all that -
now people can live a long, full life. Just like the
folks in the Obits.

susie
Seamore Tush - 17 Dec 2005 17:28 GMT
Susie, age 9 wrote...
> Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005  Bay Area Reporter
> /
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> A special thank-you to Dr. Amy Tezza, M.D. of Kaiser
> for all of your years of support.

Very interesting, it confirms my claim that "monogamy" among gay
men is defined as anything less than 12 random sexual partners
a week.  Let's see, they were "partners" for 33 years, and since
2005 - 33 = 1972, that means Mr. Anstadt caught the virus sometime
after that.  I'm willing to bet it wasn't a blood transfusion,
since the blood supply was cleaned up by the mid-1980s and he
surely would have expired long before now.

> 2 Luis Cesar Cabrera (Lola Lust)
>
> October 19, 1953 - November 21, 2005
>
> Luis died at home in the early hours of November 21st. Luis
> was fondly known in the Gay Community

No mention of cause of death, but it is pretty obvious that any
dude calling himself "Lola Lust" has HIV.  I'm just suprised he
made it to age 52, a good 25 years of whoring himself for crack
before finally succumbing to the virus.

I was watching Will & Grace the other night, and Jack was upset
because he was turning 30, and he asks if they knew how old 30
was in gay years.  I think your criticism of the ARVs is off
base, no medication could possibly make a gay male self-destruct
faster than he already would.
Iconoclaster - 19 Dec 2005 23:48 GMT
>"I think your criticism of the ARVs is off
base, no medication could possibly make a gay male self-destruct faster
than he already would."

I thought nothing could surprise me anymore, here in the snake pit, but
you did, Tushy.  When did you come crawling out from under that rock?
Obviously, you're no toxicological genius. There are plenty of chemicals
that can make a gay (or any other) male self-destruct (sic) in a very
short time.  If I were gay, I would be scared as hell of hospitals,
doctors and their poisons.
The only thing I have against some gay men is that they're dumb enough not
to see that they're being systematically murdered by the medical
establsishment.
Death - 20 Dec 2005 00:43 GMT
"Iconoclaster" <wgods@xs4all.nl> wrote in message

> The only thing I have against some gay men is that they're dumb enough not
> to see that they're being systematically murdered by the medical
> establsishment.

can anyone say abortion
Seamore Tush - 20 Dec 2005 07:16 GMT
Iconoclaster wrote...
>>"I think your criticism of the ARVs is off
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> to see that they're being systematically murdered by the medical
> establsishment.

Well I happen to be gay and while I haven't self-destructed I have watched
my gay brother and all his gay friends self-destruct.  I'm pretty sure no
doctor prescribed that ten tons of methamphetamine my brother used to fry
his brain, and the allegedly toxic ARV drugs have kept him alive for the
last 10 years, translating as 10,000 extra people he infected with HIV.  I
suppose that could be considered being murdered by the medical establishment.
Iconoclaster - 21 Dec 2005 01:18 GMT
>"I'm pretty sure no doctor prescribed that ten tons of methamphetamine my
brother used to fry his brain, and the allegedly toxic ARV drugs have kept
him alive for the last 10 years, translating as 10,000 extra people he
infected with HIV."

I'm sorry to hear about your brother.  If he's still alive, he must be a
tough cookie.  Yes, he really contributed to his own demise, taking meth.
And it would be the smart thing to stop with the ARV's, if it's not too
late yet.  Otherwise he would be just another medical murder victim.  And
don't worry about any people he "infected" with HIV.  That's just an idea
that's being forced on unfortunate victims.  Not only do they have to die,
they are also supposed to feel guilty about it.
Seamore Tush - 21 Dec 2005 04:09 GMT
Iconoclaster wrote...
>>"I'm pretty sure no doctor prescribed that ten tons of methamphetamine my
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> that's being forced on unfortunate victims.  Not only do they have to die,
> they are also supposed to feel guilty about it.

Huh?  He should stop taking the ARVs when it is those drugs that have kept
him alive since 1995?  As for guilt, well I'm willing to forgive those he
infected before he tested HIV+, even if his behavior was still utterly
irresponsible, but I'm talking about the 10,000 (guess) people he's infected
AFTER testing HIV+.  No, I can't prove it of course, all I know is that from
1990-1995 his a.s was parked at the gay bar every night, and from 1995-2005
his a.s has been parked at the gay bar every night.  And when he came to
visit me a few months ago he told me he was going to a bathhouse because
"he hadn't had sex in three months."  I hollered at him that what he was
going to do was criminal, and his response was that the law against having
sex in public didn't apply because technically the bathhouse was private
property.  When I said "criminal" I meant knowingly infecting someone with
HIV, but that thought never crossed his mind.  No guilt at all, just a
complete amoral drug-addled contagious intellectual void.  You are correct
in that he should stop taking the ARVs, but only because the quicker he
dies of AIDS the better off society will be.

Then again maybe it doesn't really matter who he has sex with, I've already
expressed my belief that everyone in the (active) gay community is infected,
it is probable that 100% of the bathhouse patrons are HIV+.  But then again
no one is going to warn the others that they are infected, without actually
knowing whether the others are already infected, their intent is to
deliberately spread the virus.
Iconoclaster - 22 Dec 2005 23:04 GMT
>"Huh?  He should stop taking the ARVs when it is those drugs that have
kept him alive since 1995?"

Are you sure he didn't remain alive *in spite of* those drugs?  That why I
called him a tough cookie. I'm sorry to say, he won't live to a ripe old
age, but that has nothing to do with a virus, and everything with drugs,
both the illegal and the medically prescribed drugs.
We are constantly being bombarded with propaganda that the ARV drugs save
lives.  There is absolutely no evidence that they do.  Nobody lives a day
longer thanks to these meds.  The only long-term controlled study was the
famous Concorde study.  But that was done in 1994, when only AZT
monotherapy was used.  No controlled long-term study has been performed on
the HAART meds that are used now (which still contain AZT).  It is know,
though, that they cause severe liver- and kidney problems, causing many
deaths.

>"When I said "criminal" I meant knowingly infecting someone with HIV, but
that thought never crossed his mind."

It would never cros my mind either.  To infect somebody with a virus,
there must *be* a virus.
Again, we've been indoctrinated for more than 20 years now, but proof that
this dangerous virus (HIV) really exists has never been delivered.

If really 100% of the bathhouse patrons were infected with a deadly virus,
then very soon there would be no gay men left.  Of course, that will not
happen.  Note that female prostitutes are not a "risk group", and
according to the HIV/AIDS theory, they would be expected to.
This whole HIV/AIDS circus started as a direct attack on the gay community
in New York and San Francisco.  Gay men are indeed being killed off; not
by a virus, but by the drugs that are supposed  to fight the virus
infection.  And in the meantime, the big pharma houses are really cleaning
up.  I find it very sad that a lot of gay men, including many who post to
this forum, don't see that they are the intended victims of this scam.

I wish your brother well.  He may not be bright enough to say "no" to
drugs (both the street drugs and the meds), but his behavior is not
criminal.
GMCarter - 23 Dec 2005 00:27 GMT
>>"Huh?  He should stop taking the ARVs when it is those drugs that have
>kept him alive since 1995?"
>
>Are you sure he didn't remain alive *in spite of* those drugs?

Friends I know who have been on them that long or longer are alive in
spite of HIV.

Which causes AIDS.

Which you will never get--even if it kills you like it did David
Pasquarelli.

        George M. Carter
Iconoclaster - 24 Dec 2005 22:10 GMT
Some people are tougher than others.  We've known that for ages.  Yes, I
know I'll never get AIDS, Mr. Carter.  We have a problem here, though,
because now I feel that I can't afford to die of natural causes.  If I
did, you would immediately start to dance on my grave, crowing that I died
of your non-existing virus, as you're constantly doing to David
Pasquarelli.  So I feel forced to live on to a very advanced age, until
you and your friends have died or gotten yourself real jobs.
GMCarter - 25 Dec 2005 11:05 GMT
>Some people are tougher than others.  We've known that for ages.  Yes, I
>know I'll never get AIDS, Mr. Carter.  We have a problem here, though,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Pasquarelli.  So I feel forced to live on to a very advanced age, until
>you and your friends have died or gotten yourself real jobs.

Not in the slightest. I have no reason to believe that you are a
person living with HIV.

And further, I do not celebrate Pasquarelli's death. I feel badly for
the man's lover and family. I feel badly that he had to die to young
because he bought the stupid lie that HIV doesn't cause AIDS.

He was a young man and had more years of life in him. I wish he could
have LIVED by recognizing he had AIDS and found better treatment--and
stood as an example of someone who said: The denialists are liars and
fools.

May you live long and well--and with deeper wisdom. Though I seriously
doubt you will.

        George M. Carter
Susie, age 9 - 04 Jan 2006 01:22 GMT
> And further, I do not celebrate Pasquarelli's death.

Hah! George Mohammed Carter has been dancing on Pasquarelli's grave
for years!

> I feel badly for
> the man's lover and family. I feel badly that he had to die to young
> because he bought the stupid lie that HIV doesn't cause AIDS.

But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE
they believed HIV caused AIDS?

susie
wilyretrovirus - 04 Jan 2006 01:51 GMT
> And further, I do not celebrate Pasquarelli's death.

Hah! George Mohammed Carter has been dancing on Pasquarelli's grave
for years!

> I feel badly for
> the man's lover and family. I feel badly that he had to die to young
> because he bought the stupid lie that HIV doesn't cause AIDS.

But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE
they believed HIV caused AIDS?

susie

==============================

Susie,

not just a good point, but it's the truth as well.

The paradigm's coming down, and I'd HATE to be in the shoes of these guys
when it does.  But they know what they're doing.  So it's kind of
difficult to feel a whole lot of compassion for their plight.
Gary Stein - 04 Jan 2006 03:14 GMT
>> And further, I do not celebrate Pasquarelli's death.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> when it does.  But they know what they're doing.  So it's kind of
> difficult to feel a whole lot of compassion for their plight.

So now both Susie/frod and wilyretrovirus agree that HIV causes AIDS and
AIDS causes death both in treated and untreated populations. Susie/frod
agreed in an earlier post that ARV prolongs the life of AIDS patients with
200 or less CD4 cell counts. By god boys I think you've finally got it.

Yes legions of people who believed HIV causes AIDS have died, HIV and AIDS
killed them as you now agree. George and I and the rest of the mainstream,
we all feel bad for those who have died in this terrible epidemic especially
bad for those who buy into the denialist faith and die sooner then they
needed to.

Gary Stein
wilyretrovirus - 04 Jan 2006 22:02 GMT
>But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE
>they believed HIV caused AIDS?

"So now both Susie/frod and wilyretrovirus agree that HIV causes AIDS and
AIDS causes death both in treated and untreated populations."

"Yes legions of people who believed HIV causes AIDS have died, HIV and
AIDS killed them as you now agree."

You ain't too bright now, are you, Gary?  The operative word here is
BELIEVED.  Can you say that, Gary?  Good, I knew you could.

"HIV=AIDS" is a belief system.  If you *believe* in it, you're most likely
going to allow yourself to become a human guinea pig for all sorts of
wonderful "treatments".  People I've known who've been "treated" are dead.
People I know who haven't been "treated" are alive...20 years post
"diagnosis".  "Treatment" for a make-believe virus KILLS.
Susie, age 9 - 05 Jan 2006 19:48 GMT
> >But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE
>>they believed HIV caused AIDS?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> People I know who haven't been "treated" are alive...20 years post
> "diagnosis".  "Treatment" for a make-believe virus KILLS.

Indeed, the very definition of the term "Long-term survivor" is limited
ONLY to those who have NOT used the drugs at all or for a very
short time.

This fact bothers the PharmaGoons immensely.

susie
wilyretrovirus - 05 Jan 2006 22:46 GMT
"Indeed, the very definition of the term "Long-term survivor" is limited
ONLY to those who have NOT used the drugs at all or for a very short
time."

"This fact bothers the PharmaGoons immensely."

Susie,
let's do the math.  Long-term survivor=no drugs.
Hmmm.  What's a rational person supposed to think?  
GMCarter - 05 Jan 2006 23:07 GMT
>"Indeed, the very definition of the term "Long-term survivor" is limited
>ONLY to those who have NOT used the drugs at all or for a very short
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>let's do the math.  Long-term survivor=no drugs.
>Hmmm.  What's a rational person supposed to think?  

That you're both a couple of first class idiots?

Long term slow or non-progressors is the correct term, as you well
know. They survive a long term with a stable CD4 count. Why take
drugs? They're not getting sick.

Unfortunately, this is NOT the case for the vast majority of
HIV-infected individuals, children or adults. Indeed, well over 90% of
HIV+ people DO progress. CD4 counts drop. When they get low, vastly
increased risk of infection occurs. And then they develop things like
PCP or cryptococcal meningitis. Like David Pasquarelli did. And he
DIED because he believed these f.cking lies. Do you have NO shame?

This reality has been pointed out to you previously. You refuse to
wrap your pointy, brain-dead little mind around these simple facts.

That kills people who buy your brand of bullshit.

What's a rational person supposed to think?

        George M. Carter
wilyretrovirus - 06 Jan 2006 00:24 GMT
"Long term slow or non-progressors is the correct term, as you well know.
They survive a long term with a stable CD4 count. Why take drugs? They're
not getting sick."

You're obviously missing a point that must be a little too subtle for you
to grasp, George.  Long-term non-progressors=no drugs.  They aren't
getting sick because they aren't being "treated" for a make-believe virus.
Too subtle?

"And then they develop things like
PCP or cryptococcal meningitis. Like David Pasquarelli did. And he DIED
because he believed these f.cking lies."

Yep, sure, George.  I REALLY believe you're upset about Pasquarelli's
death.  Please, don't insult our intelligence here.  

I don't think we'll ever really know what Pasquarelli "believed" or not.

Him and his extended group of ACTUPSF friends struck me (I attended a
meeting) as a group of rabble-rousers who just needed a cause in which to
vent their anger at the world.  

Mr. Pasquarelli was supposedly taking the "meds"...so it doesn't sound all
that cut and dry as far as what he "believed".  My view of him is that he
was a passionate person who liked being the center of attention and being
controversial.  I've read his writings about his "diagnosis".  It really
sounds like he was horribly conflicted about it inwardly, but very much
the "dissident" outwardly.  I think there are plenty of "dissidents" who
are just as conflicted.  They want out of this nightmare, unlike you and
your HIV goon-friends who seek to keep this highly profitable genocidal
nightmare going.  "Dissidents" can be conflicted, George, just like
anybody can.
Brian Mailman - 06 Jan 2006 00:27 GMT
> "Long term slow or non-progressors is the correct term, as you well know.
> They survive a long term with a stable CD4 count. Why take drugs? They're
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> getting sick because they aren't being "treated" for a make-believe virus.
>  Too subtle?

YAAAYYYYY!!!  IT WORKS!!!  I'm not being treated for smallpox right now
AND I DON"T HAVE IT!!!

B/
GMCarter - 06 Jan 2006 12:34 GMT
>Yep, sure, George.  I REALLY believe you're upset about Pasquarelli's
>death.  Please, don't insult our intelligence here.  

You bet I am. But my feelings about the matter are irrelevant.

>I don't think we'll ever really know what Pasquarelli "believed" or not.

f.ck you. Look it up.

        George M. Carter
Susie, age 9 - 07 Jan 2006 02:22 GMT
>>Yep, sure, George.  I REALLY believe you're upset about Pasquarelli's
>>death.  Please, don't insult our intelligence here.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> f.ck you. Look it up.

Oh my, little George Mohammed Carter is having a rough
start for the New Year.

susie
Susie, age 9 - 07 Jan 2006 02:21 GMT
>>"Indeed, the very definition of the term "Long-term survivor" is limited
>>ONLY to those who have NOT used the drugs at all or for a very short
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> That you're both a couple of first class idiots?

No, George Mohammed, I said RATIONAL person.

susie
GMCarter - 07 Jan 2006 11:52 GMT
>No, George Mohammed, I said RATIONAL person.

Gosh, and there I thought "wilyretrovirus" said that.

Anyway, you're clearly not rational. No rational adult man would
retreat into hiding behind the alias of a 9-year old girl with a "Bad
Seed" attitude.

But then, maybe you're still having a bad life and pangs of guilt over
having contributed to Pasquarelli's death by dissuading him from using
ARVs.

        George M. Carter
wilyretrovirus - 07 Jan 2006 14:26 GMT
"But then, maybe you're still having a bad life and pangs of guilt over
having contributed to Pasquarelli's death by dissuading him from using
ARVs."

George,
I'm quite sure that you and Iconoclaster were in agreement (in past posts)
that Pasquarelli had been "treated" with "AIDS drugs", if only for a short
while before his death.

Your supposed "feelings" or empathy concerning Mr. Pasquarelli's death
come off as being quite disingenuous.  You also do him a real disservice
by implying that he somehow wasn't able to think for himself because he
"bought into the lies".
GMCarter - 04 Jan 2006 11:43 GMT
>But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE
>they believed HIV caused AIDS?

What an absurd comment. No one has died because they BELIEVED HIV
causes AIDS...but many have died of AIDS because that's the condtion
that arises among most people infected with HIV.

Unless there is treatment. Failure to treat properly almost invariably
leads to death. As it did with David as he believed your lies and
delayed treatment til it was too late. He ignored the warning signs
and opportunistic infections til near the very end.

And he died. And his death if it should mean anything (as any of our
lives or deaths should mean anything) is to serve as a clarion call
for denialists to pull their heads out of the sand and stop the lies.

        George M. Carter
Susie, age 9 - 05 Jan 2006 19:45 GMT
>>But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE
>>they believed HIV caused AIDS?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Unless there is treatment. Failure to treat properly almost invariably
> leads to death.

But treating people leads to salvation?

LOL

susie

========== Early ARV Treatment = NO BENEFIT

After years of promoting "early ARV" treatment as "life-saving",
the pharma shills on this newsgroup are STILL biting their
tongues over the July 2004 revision of the HIV Standard
of Care as published in JAMA:

  "For less severely compromised individuals  (ie, asymptomatic
   individuals with CD4 cell counts > 200/microL), there are no
  definitive data from prospective, randomized controlled
  studies to determine when antiretroviral therapy is associated
  with a survival benefit."

My favorite parts are the disclosures about the outrageous
conflicts of interest by the doctors who have been misleading
about HIV treatment since the first AZT studies.

____

In the 7/14/04 JAMA article titled "Treatment for Adult HIV Infection:

2004 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel,"
Yeni et al. state:

"Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a survival benefit
with the use of antiretroviral therapy by patients with severe
immunodeficiency. For less severely compromised individuals
(ie, asymptomatic individuals with CD4 cell counts > 200/microL),
there are no definitive data from prospective, randomized controlled
studies to determine when antiretroviral therapy is associated with a
survival benefit. In the absence of such data, the decision to
initiate therapy should be made based on survival and disease
progression information obtained from observational studies, the
consequences of moderate degrees of immune deficiency, and the
long-term safety of antiretroviral drugs."

---------------------------------

JAMA.2004 Jul 14;292:251-265.

Treatment for Adult HIV Infection

2004 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel

Patrick G. Yeni, MD; Scott M. Hammer, MD; Martin S. Hirsch,
MD; Michael S. Saag, MD; Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD; Charles
C. J. Carpenter, MD; Margaret A. Fischl, MD; Jose M. Gatell,
MD, PhD; Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD; Donna M. Jacobsen, BS;
David A. Katzenstein, MD; Julio S. G. Montaner, MD; Douglas
D. Richman, MD; Robert T. Schooley, MD; Melanie A. Thompson,
MD; Stefano Vella, MD; Paul A. Volberding, MD

Abstract: Context  Substantial changes in the field of human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment have occurred in the last 2
years, prompting revision of the guidelines for antiretroviral
management of adults with established HIV infection.

Objective  To update recommendations for physicians who provide HIV
care regarding when to start antiretroviral therapy, what drugs to
start with, when to change drug regimens, and what drug regimens to
switch to after therapy fails.

Data Sources  Evidence was identified and reviewed by a 16-member
noncompensated panel of physicians with expertise in HIV-related basic
science and clinical research, antiretroviral therapy, and HIV patient
care. The panel was designed to have broad US and international
representation for areas with adequate access to antiretroviral
management.

Study Selection  Evidence considered included published basic science,
clinical research, and epidemiological data (identified by experts in
the field or extracted through MEDLINE searches using terms relevant
to  antiretroviral therapy) and abstracts from HIV-oriented scientific
conferences between July 2002 and May 2004.

Data Extraction  Data were reviewed to identify any information that
might change previous guidelines. Based on panel discussion,
guidelines were drafted by a writing committee and discussed by the panel
until consensus was reached.

Data Synthesis  Four antiretroviral drugs recently have been made
available and have broadened the options for initial and subsequent
regimens. New data allow more definitive recommendations for specific
drugs or regimens to include or avoid, particularly with regard to
initial therapy. Recommendations are rated according to 7 evidence
categories, ranging from I (data from prospective randomized clinical
trials) to VII (expert opinion of the panel).

Conclusion  Further insights into the roles of drug toxic effects,
drug resistance, and pharmacological interactions have resulted in
additional guidance for strategic approaches to antiretroviral
management.

Author Affiliations: Department of Infectious Diseases,
Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, X. Bichat Medical School,
Paris, France (Dr Yeni); Department of Medicine, Columbia
University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
(Dr Hammer); Department of Immunology and Infectious
Diseases, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Hirsch);
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham
(Dr Saag); Department of Preventive Medicine, Universidade
Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (Dr
Schechter); Department of Biomedicine, Brown University
School of Medicine, Providence, RI (Dr Carpenter);
Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of
Medicine, Miami, Fla (Dr Fischl); Department of Medicine,
University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (Dr Gatell);
Department of HIV Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster
Hospital, London, England (Dr Gazzard); International AIDS
Society-USA, San Francisco, Calif (Ms Jacobsen); Department
of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford,
Calif (Dr Katzenstein); Department of Medicine, University
of British Columbia, Vancouver (Dr Montaner); Departments of
Pathology and Medicine, University of California and San
Diego VA Healthcare System, San Diego (Dr Richman);
Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of
Medicine, Denver (Dr Schooley); AIDS Research Consortium of
Atlanta, Ga (Dr Thompson); Istituto Superiore di Sanità,
Rome, Italy (Dr Vella); Department of Medicine, University
of California and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, San Francisco (Dr Volberding).

===================================================
Financial disclosures of AIDS researchers - 7/14/04 JAMA

JAMA, July 14, 2004 Vol 292, No. 2 251-265

Treatment for Adult 2004 Recommendations International AIDS Society-
USA Panel

Patrick G. Yeni, MD
Scott M. Hammer, MD
Martin S. Hirsch, MD
Michael S. Saag, MD
Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD
Charles C. J. Carpenter, MD
Margaret A. Fischl, MD
Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD
Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD
Donna M. Jacobsen, BS
David A. Katzenstein, MD
Julio S. G. Montaner, MD
Douglas D. Richman, MD
Robert T. Schooley, MD
Melanie A. Thompson, MD
Stefano Vella, MD
Paul A. Volberding, MD
Patrick G. Yeni, MD

Dr Yeni has received research grants for site investigator
from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol- Myers Squibb, Boehringer
Ingelheim, Roche, Tibotec/Virco, and Gilead.

Dr Yeni has received honoraria for advisory positions and lecture
sponsorships from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb,
Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Tibotec/Virco, and Merck Sharp
and Dohme.

Scott M. Hammer, MD

Dr Hammer has received research grants for site investigator from
Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck.

Dr Hammer has been a consultant for Bristol-Myers
Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Shionogi, Pfizer, Boehringer
Ingelheim, Shire, Gilead, and Tibotec/ Virco.

Martin S. Hirsch, MD

Dr Hirsch has received research support from Takeda.

Dr Hirsch has been a consultant for Schering Plough, GlaxoSmithKline,
and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Michael S. Saag, MD

Dr Saag has received research support from Abbott Laboratories,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho
Biotech/Johnson&Johnson, Pfizer/Agouron, and Hoffmann- LaRoche.

Dr Saag has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Boeringer
Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline,
OrthoBiotech/Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer/Agouron, Roche,
Schering-Plough, Shire Pharmaceutical, TherapyEdge, Tibotec/ Virco,
Trimeria, Vertex, and ViroLogic.

Dr Saag has received honoraria for positions on the speakers
bureau for Abbott Laboratories, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers
Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, OrthoBiotech,
Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Agouron, Roche, Schering-Plough,
Shire Pharmaceutical, TherapyEdge, Tibotec/Virco, Trimeria,
Vertex, and ViroLogic.

Margaret A. Fischl, MD

Dr Fischl has received research grants from Abbott Laboratories,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, and
Ortho Biotech.

Dr Fischl has received honoraria for continuing medical education
programs from GlaxoSmithKline.

Dr Fischl has served as an advisor for Agouron Pharmaceuticals and
GlaxoSmithKline.

Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD

Dr Gazzard has received research grants from Abbott Laboratories,
Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb,
and Johnson &Johnson.

Julio S. G. Montaner, MD

Dr Montaner has received grants from Abbott Laboratories,
Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Shire Biochemical, Boehringer
Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DuPont Pharma, Gilead
Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Kucera Pharmaceutical,
Merck Frosst Laboratories, Pharmacia & Upjohn, and Trimeris.

Dr Montaner has received honoraria for speaking from Abbott
Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Shire Biochemical,
Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DuPont Pharma,
Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Kucera
Pharmaceutical, Merck Frosst Laboratories, Pharmacia &
Upjohn, and Trimeris Inc.

Dr Montaner holds 2 US patents, one regarding use of nevirapine
and another regarding pharmacological applications of mitochondrial
DNA assays. Dr Montaner has 2 patent applications that are
pending, one regarding pharmacological applications of
mitochondrial DNA assays and another regarding sepsis.

Robert T. Schooley, MD

Dr Schooley has received grants from GlaxoSmithKline,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Tibotec/Virco.

Dr Schooley has been a consultant for Abbott
Laboratories, Pfizer, Hoffmann-LaRoche, GlaxoSmithKline,
BristolMyers Squibb, Merck, Vertex, ViroLogic, and
Tibotec/Virco.

Melanie A. Thompson, MD

Dr Thompson has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers
Squibb, Chiron Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead
Sciences, Merck Research Laboratories, Oxo-Chemie, Roche,
Serono, Theratechnologies, Triangle Pharmaceuticals,
Trimeris, and VaxGen.

Dr Thompson has been a consultant for Abbott
Laboratories, Agouron/Pfizer Pharmaceuticals,
GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Serono, and Triangle
Pharmaceuticals.

Dr Thompson has received honoraria for lecture sponsorships and
continuing medical education from Abbott Laboratories,
Agouron/ Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Boeringer Ingleheim,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Roche,
Serono, Triangle Pharmaceuticals, and Trimeris.

Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD

Dr Schechter has received honoraria from Abbott Laboratories,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Roche.

Dr Schechter has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories,
BristolMyers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Roche.

Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD

Dr Gatell has served in advisory positions for Roche, Bristol-Myers
Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead,
Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott Laboratories, Tibotec/ Virco.

Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD

Dr Gazzard has received lectureship fees from Abbott Laboratories,
Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb,
and Johnson & Johnson.

David A. Katzenstein, MD

Dr Katzenstein has held advisory positions at Boehringer Ingelheim,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck,
ViroLogic, Visible Genetics, and the Doris Duke Charitable Trust.

Dr Katzenstein holds a US patent for polymerase chain reaction
assays monitoring antiviral therapy and making therapeutic
decisions in the treatment of AIDS.

Stefano Vella, MD

Dr Vella has received lecture sponsorship for
satellite symposia and continuing medical education programs
from Merck, Agouron, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, and
Roche.

Paul A. Volberding, MD

Dr Volberding has received honoraria from Gilead,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Boehringer
Ingelheim.

Dr Volberding has been a consultant for Pfizer, Bristol-Myers
Squibb, and Shire.

Douglas D. Richman, MD

Dr Richman has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiron, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline,
Merck, Novirio, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Triangle, and
ViroLogic.

Corresponding Author: Patrick G. Yeni, MD, Hospital Bichat-Claude
Bernard, 46 Rue Henri-Huchard, 75877 Paris Cedex 18, France
(Patrick.Yeni@Bch .Ap-Hop-Paris.Fr).
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.