Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / January 2006
Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005 Bay Area Reporter
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Susie, age 9 - 16 Dec 2005 23:21 GMT Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005 Bay Area Reporter /
While all these deaths seem so mysterious, there is little doubt that HIV treatment is among the culprits in most cases. But the good news is that nobody seems to be dying of AIDS.
My favorite of the week is #3, whose causes of death jump right from the pages of the Antiviral Side Effects Rap Sheet. At least this one had the courage to admit the truth.
susie ----- http://www.ebar.com/obituaries
1 Merle (Mark) Beyer
August 18, 1944 - November 6, 2005
Mark passed on a Sunday with his partner of 33 years, Michael Anstadt, at his side. Mark was 61 A special thank-you to Dr. Amy Tezza, M.D. of Kaiser for all of your years of support.
2 Luis Cesar Cabrera (Lola Lust)
October 19, 1953 - November 21, 2005
Luis died at home in the early hours of November 21st. Luis was fondly known in the Gay Community
3 Michael 'Lurch' Sutton
Lurch died December 8th of an apparent heart attack, after a long struggle with cardiac problems, complications of diabetes, and HIV. He was 55.
4 Edward Costa, Jr.
went home to the Lord on Saturday, December 10, 2005, in San Leandro, California. He was 59. He was also a member and participant in various organizations in the Bay Area.
5 Daniel Taylor
My gentle friend, "Daniel," passed in Utah on October 26, 2005, with his father and family, and services were held shortly thereafter.
6 Charles Allen Wolfe
1949 - 2005
Charlie Wolfe, 10-year San Francisco resident and visual artist, died peacefully at Davies hospital on Tuesday, December 6
wilyretrovirus - 16 Dec 2005 23:47 GMT Thanks, Susie,
hopefully, it won't be too long before we ALL realize that this is nothing short of chemically-induced genocide.
wilyretrovirus - 16 Dec 2005 23:50 GMT Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005 Bay Area Reporter /
While all these deaths seem so mysterious, there is little doubt that HIV treatment is among the culprits in most cases. But the good news is that nobody seems to be dying of AIDS.
My favorite of the week is #3, whose causes of death jump right from the pages of the Antiviral Side Effects Rap Sheet. At least this one had the courage to admit the truth.
Thanks, Susie,
hopefully, it won't be too long before we ALL realize that this is nothing short of chemically-induced genocide.
Seamore Tush - 17 Dec 2005 17:31 GMT wilyretrovirus wrote...
> Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005 Bay Area Reporter > / [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > culprits in most cases. But the good news is that > nobody seems to be dying of AIDS. Why is that good news? Remember that the longer they live the more people they infect. The nice thing about AIDS is that its symptoms are visible, there is no missing the oozing, festering skin sores or that skeletal zombie look in their face. While they surely will still attract some sexual partners, most potential partners will avoid them.
Susie, age 9 - 18 Dec 2005 23:33 GMT > wilyretrovirus wrote... >> Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005 Bay Area Reporter [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Why is that good news? Remember that the longer they live > the more people they infect. So what? If infected people aren't getting AIDS, then what's the problem?
> The nice thing about AIDS is > that its symptoms are visible, there is no missing the > oozing, festering skin sores or that skeletal zombie look > in their face. While they surely will still attract some > sexual partners, most potential partners will avoid them. Haven't you heard? The drugs have fixed all that - now people can live a long, full life. Just like the folks in the Obits.
susie
Seamore Tush - 17 Dec 2005 17:28 GMT Susie, age 9 wrote...
> Antiviral Obituaries, Dec 15, 2005 Bay Area Reporter > / [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > A special thank-you to Dr. Amy Tezza, M.D. of Kaiser > for all of your years of support. Very interesting, it confirms my claim that "monogamy" among gay men is defined as anything less than 12 random sexual partners a week. Let's see, they were "partners" for 33 years, and since 2005 - 33 = 1972, that means Mr. Anstadt caught the virus sometime after that. I'm willing to bet it wasn't a blood transfusion, since the blood supply was cleaned up by the mid-1980s and he surely would have expired long before now.
> 2 Luis Cesar Cabrera (Lola Lust) > > October 19, 1953 - November 21, 2005 > > Luis died at home in the early hours of November 21st. Luis > was fondly known in the Gay Community No mention of cause of death, but it is pretty obvious that any dude calling himself "Lola Lust" has HIV. I'm just suprised he made it to age 52, a good 25 years of whoring himself for crack before finally succumbing to the virus.
I was watching Will & Grace the other night, and Jack was upset because he was turning 30, and he asks if they knew how old 30 was in gay years. I think your criticism of the ARVs is off base, no medication could possibly make a gay male self-destruct faster than he already would.
Iconoclaster - 19 Dec 2005 23:48 GMT >"I think your criticism of the ARVs is off base, no medication could possibly make a gay male self-destruct faster than he already would."
I thought nothing could surprise me anymore, here in the snake pit, but you did, Tushy. When did you come crawling out from under that rock? Obviously, you're no toxicological genius. There are plenty of chemicals that can make a gay (or any other) male self-destruct (sic) in a very short time. If I were gay, I would be scared as hell of hospitals, doctors and their poisons. The only thing I have against some gay men is that they're dumb enough not to see that they're being systematically murdered by the medical establsishment.
Death - 20 Dec 2005 00:43 GMT "Iconoclaster" <wgods@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> The only thing I have against some gay men is that they're dumb enough not > to see that they're being systematically murdered by the medical > establsishment. can anyone say abortion
Seamore Tush - 20 Dec 2005 07:16 GMT Iconoclaster wrote...
>>"I think your criticism of the ARVs is off > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > to see that they're being systematically murdered by the medical > establsishment. Well I happen to be gay and while I haven't self-destructed I have watched my gay brother and all his gay friends self-destruct. I'm pretty sure no doctor prescribed that ten tons of methamphetamine my brother used to fry his brain, and the allegedly toxic ARV drugs have kept him alive for the last 10 years, translating as 10,000 extra people he infected with HIV. I suppose that could be considered being murdered by the medical establishment.
Iconoclaster - 21 Dec 2005 01:18 GMT >"I'm pretty sure no doctor prescribed that ten tons of methamphetamine my brother used to fry his brain, and the allegedly toxic ARV drugs have kept him alive for the last 10 years, translating as 10,000 extra people he infected with HIV."
I'm sorry to hear about your brother. If he's still alive, he must be a tough cookie. Yes, he really contributed to his own demise, taking meth. And it would be the smart thing to stop with the ARV's, if it's not too late yet. Otherwise he would be just another medical murder victim. And don't worry about any people he "infected" with HIV. That's just an idea that's being forced on unfortunate victims. Not only do they have to die, they are also supposed to feel guilty about it.
Seamore Tush - 21 Dec 2005 04:09 GMT Iconoclaster wrote...
>>"I'm pretty sure no doctor prescribed that ten tons of methamphetamine my > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > that's being forced on unfortunate victims. Not only do they have to die, > they are also supposed to feel guilty about it. Huh? He should stop taking the ARVs when it is those drugs that have kept him alive since 1995? As for guilt, well I'm willing to forgive those he infected before he tested HIV+, even if his behavior was still utterly irresponsible, but I'm talking about the 10,000 (guess) people he's infected AFTER testing HIV+. No, I can't prove it of course, all I know is that from 1990-1995 his a.s was parked at the gay bar every night, and from 1995-2005 his a.s has been parked at the gay bar every night. And when he came to visit me a few months ago he told me he was going to a bathhouse because "he hadn't had sex in three months." I hollered at him that what he was going to do was criminal, and his response was that the law against having sex in public didn't apply because technically the bathhouse was private property. When I said "criminal" I meant knowingly infecting someone with HIV, but that thought never crossed his mind. No guilt at all, just a complete amoral drug-addled contagious intellectual void. You are correct in that he should stop taking the ARVs, but only because the quicker he dies of AIDS the better off society will be.
Then again maybe it doesn't really matter who he has sex with, I've already expressed my belief that everyone in the (active) gay community is infected, it is probable that 100% of the bathhouse patrons are HIV+. But then again no one is going to warn the others that they are infected, without actually knowing whether the others are already infected, their intent is to deliberately spread the virus.
Iconoclaster - 22 Dec 2005 23:04 GMT >"Huh? He should stop taking the ARVs when it is those drugs that have kept him alive since 1995?"
Are you sure he didn't remain alive *in spite of* those drugs? That why I called him a tough cookie. I'm sorry to say, he won't live to a ripe old age, but that has nothing to do with a virus, and everything with drugs, both the illegal and the medically prescribed drugs. We are constantly being bombarded with propaganda that the ARV drugs save lives. There is absolutely no evidence that they do. Nobody lives a day longer thanks to these meds. The only long-term controlled study was the famous Concorde study. But that was done in 1994, when only AZT monotherapy was used. No controlled long-term study has been performed on the HAART meds that are used now (which still contain AZT). It is know, though, that they cause severe liver- and kidney problems, causing many deaths.
>"When I said "criminal" I meant knowingly infecting someone with HIV, but that thought never crossed his mind."
It would never cros my mind either. To infect somebody with a virus, there must *be* a virus. Again, we've been indoctrinated for more than 20 years now, but proof that this dangerous virus (HIV) really exists has never been delivered.
If really 100% of the bathhouse patrons were infected with a deadly virus, then very soon there would be no gay men left. Of course, that will not happen. Note that female prostitutes are not a "risk group", and according to the HIV/AIDS theory, they would be expected to. This whole HIV/AIDS circus started as a direct attack on the gay community in New York and San Francisco. Gay men are indeed being killed off; not by a virus, but by the drugs that are supposed to fight the virus infection. And in the meantime, the big pharma houses are really cleaning up. I find it very sad that a lot of gay men, including many who post to this forum, don't see that they are the intended victims of this scam.
I wish your brother well. He may not be bright enough to say "no" to drugs (both the street drugs and the meds), but his behavior is not criminal.
GMCarter - 23 Dec 2005 00:27 GMT >>"Huh? He should stop taking the ARVs when it is those drugs that have >kept him alive since 1995?" > >Are you sure he didn't remain alive *in spite of* those drugs? Friends I know who have been on them that long or longer are alive in spite of HIV.
Which causes AIDS.
Which you will never get--even if it kills you like it did David Pasquarelli.
George M. Carter
Iconoclaster - 24 Dec 2005 22:10 GMT Some people are tougher than others. We've known that for ages. Yes, I know I'll never get AIDS, Mr. Carter. We have a problem here, though, because now I feel that I can't afford to die of natural causes. If I did, you would immediately start to dance on my grave, crowing that I died of your non-existing virus, as you're constantly doing to David Pasquarelli. So I feel forced to live on to a very advanced age, until you and your friends have died or gotten yourself real jobs.
GMCarter - 25 Dec 2005 11:05 GMT >Some people are tougher than others. We've known that for ages. Yes, I >know I'll never get AIDS, Mr. Carter. We have a problem here, though, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Pasquarelli. So I feel forced to live on to a very advanced age, until >you and your friends have died or gotten yourself real jobs. Not in the slightest. I have no reason to believe that you are a person living with HIV.
And further, I do not celebrate Pasquarelli's death. I feel badly for the man's lover and family. I feel badly that he had to die to young because he bought the stupid lie that HIV doesn't cause AIDS.
He was a young man and had more years of life in him. I wish he could have LIVED by recognizing he had AIDS and found better treatment--and stood as an example of someone who said: The denialists are liars and fools.
May you live long and well--and with deeper wisdom. Though I seriously doubt you will.
George M. Carter
Susie, age 9 - 04 Jan 2006 01:22 GMT > And further, I do not celebrate Pasquarelli's death. Hah! George Mohammed Carter has been dancing on Pasquarelli's grave for years!
> I feel badly for > the man's lover and family. I feel badly that he had to die to young > because he bought the stupid lie that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE they believed HIV caused AIDS?
susie
wilyretrovirus - 04 Jan 2006 01:51 GMT > And further, I do not celebrate Pasquarelli's death. Hah! George Mohammed Carter has been dancing on Pasquarelli's grave for years!
> I feel badly for > the man's lover and family. I feel badly that he had to die to young > because he bought the stupid lie that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE they believed HIV caused AIDS?
susie
==============================
Susie,
not just a good point, but it's the truth as well.
The paradigm's coming down, and I'd HATE to be in the shoes of these guys when it does. But they know what they're doing. So it's kind of difficult to feel a whole lot of compassion for their plight.
Gary Stein - 04 Jan 2006 03:14 GMT >> And further, I do not celebrate Pasquarelli's death. > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > when it does. But they know what they're doing. So it's kind of > difficult to feel a whole lot of compassion for their plight. So now both Susie/frod and wilyretrovirus agree that HIV causes AIDS and AIDS causes death both in treated and untreated populations. Susie/frod agreed in an earlier post that ARV prolongs the life of AIDS patients with 200 or less CD4 cell counts. By god boys I think you've finally got it.
Yes legions of people who believed HIV causes AIDS have died, HIV and AIDS killed them as you now agree. George and I and the rest of the mainstream, we all feel bad for those who have died in this terrible epidemic especially bad for those who buy into the denialist faith and die sooner then they needed to.
Gary Stein
wilyretrovirus - 04 Jan 2006 22:02 GMT >But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE >they believed HIV caused AIDS? "So now both Susie/frod and wilyretrovirus agree that HIV causes AIDS and AIDS causes death both in treated and untreated populations."
"Yes legions of people who believed HIV causes AIDS have died, HIV and AIDS killed them as you now agree."
You ain't too bright now, are you, Gary? The operative word here is BELIEVED. Can you say that, Gary? Good, I knew you could.
"HIV=AIDS" is a belief system. If you *believe* in it, you're most likely going to allow yourself to become a human guinea pig for all sorts of wonderful "treatments". People I've known who've been "treated" are dead. People I know who haven't been "treated" are alive...20 years post "diagnosis". "Treatment" for a make-believe virus KILLS.
Susie, age 9 - 05 Jan 2006 19:48 GMT > >But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE >>they believed HIV caused AIDS? [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > People I know who haven't been "treated" are alive...20 years post > "diagnosis". "Treatment" for a make-believe virus KILLS. Indeed, the very definition of the term "Long-term survivor" is limited ONLY to those who have NOT used the drugs at all or for a very short time.
This fact bothers the PharmaGoons immensely.
susie
wilyretrovirus - 05 Jan 2006 22:46 GMT "Indeed, the very definition of the term "Long-term survivor" is limited ONLY to those who have NOT used the drugs at all or for a very short time."
"This fact bothers the PharmaGoons immensely."
Susie, let's do the math. Long-term survivor=no drugs. Hmmm. What's a rational person supposed to think?
GMCarter - 05 Jan 2006 23:07 GMT >"Indeed, the very definition of the term "Long-term survivor" is limited >ONLY to those who have NOT used the drugs at all or for a very short [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >let's do the math. Long-term survivor=no drugs. >Hmmm. What's a rational person supposed to think? That you're both a couple of first class idiots?
Long term slow or non-progressors is the correct term, as you well know. They survive a long term with a stable CD4 count. Why take drugs? They're not getting sick.
Unfortunately, this is NOT the case for the vast majority of HIV-infected individuals, children or adults. Indeed, well over 90% of HIV+ people DO progress. CD4 counts drop. When they get low, vastly increased risk of infection occurs. And then they develop things like PCP or cryptococcal meningitis. Like David Pasquarelli did. And he DIED because he believed these f.cking lies. Do you have NO shame?
This reality has been pointed out to you previously. You refuse to wrap your pointy, brain-dead little mind around these simple facts.
That kills people who buy your brand of bullshit.
What's a rational person supposed to think?
George M. Carter
wilyretrovirus - 06 Jan 2006 00:24 GMT "Long term slow or non-progressors is the correct term, as you well know. They survive a long term with a stable CD4 count. Why take drugs? They're not getting sick."
You're obviously missing a point that must be a little too subtle for you to grasp, George. Long-term non-progressors=no drugs. They aren't getting sick because they aren't being "treated" for a make-believe virus. Too subtle?
"And then they develop things like PCP or cryptococcal meningitis. Like David Pasquarelli did. And he DIED because he believed these f.cking lies."
Yep, sure, George. I REALLY believe you're upset about Pasquarelli's death. Please, don't insult our intelligence here.
I don't think we'll ever really know what Pasquarelli "believed" or not.
Him and his extended group of ACTUPSF friends struck me (I attended a meeting) as a group of rabble-rousers who just needed a cause in which to vent their anger at the world.
Mr. Pasquarelli was supposedly taking the "meds"...so it doesn't sound all that cut and dry as far as what he "believed". My view of him is that he was a passionate person who liked being the center of attention and being controversial. I've read his writings about his "diagnosis". It really sounds like he was horribly conflicted about it inwardly, but very much the "dissident" outwardly. I think there are plenty of "dissidents" who are just as conflicted. They want out of this nightmare, unlike you and your HIV goon-friends who seek to keep this highly profitable genocidal nightmare going. "Dissidents" can be conflicted, George, just like anybody can.
Brian Mailman - 06 Jan 2006 00:27 GMT > "Long term slow or non-progressors is the correct term, as you well know. > They survive a long term with a stable CD4 count. Why take drugs? They're [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > getting sick because they aren't being "treated" for a make-believe virus. > Too subtle? YAAAYYYYY!!! IT WORKS!!! I'm not being treated for smallpox right now AND I DON"T HAVE IT!!!
B/
GMCarter - 06 Jan 2006 12:34 GMT >Yep, sure, George. I REALLY believe you're upset about Pasquarelli's >death. Please, don't insult our intelligence here. You bet I am. But my feelings about the matter are irrelevant.
>I don't think we'll ever really know what Pasquarelli "believed" or not. f.ck you. Look it up.
George M. Carter
Susie, age 9 - 07 Jan 2006 02:22 GMT >>Yep, sure, George. I REALLY believe you're upset about Pasquarelli's >>death. Please, don't insult our intelligence here. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > f.ck you. Look it up. Oh my, little George Mohammed Carter is having a rough start for the New Year.
susie
Susie, age 9 - 07 Jan 2006 02:21 GMT >>"Indeed, the very definition of the term "Long-term survivor" is limited >>ONLY to those who have NOT used the drugs at all or for a very short [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > That you're both a couple of first class idiots? No, George Mohammed, I said RATIONAL person.
susie
GMCarter - 07 Jan 2006 11:52 GMT >No, George Mohammed, I said RATIONAL person. Gosh, and there I thought "wilyretrovirus" said that.
Anyway, you're clearly not rational. No rational adult man would retreat into hiding behind the alias of a 9-year old girl with a "Bad Seed" attitude.
But then, maybe you're still having a bad life and pangs of guilt over having contributed to Pasquarelli's death by dissuading him from using ARVs.
George M. Carter
wilyretrovirus - 07 Jan 2006 14:26 GMT "But then, maybe you're still having a bad life and pangs of guilt over having contributed to Pasquarelli's death by dissuading him from using ARVs."
George, I'm quite sure that you and Iconoclaster were in agreement (in past posts) that Pasquarelli had been "treated" with "AIDS drugs", if only for a short while before his death.
Your supposed "feelings" or empathy concerning Mr. Pasquarelli's death come off as being quite disingenuous. You also do him a real disservice by implying that he somehow wasn't able to think for himself because he "bought into the lies".
GMCarter - 04 Jan 2006 11:43 GMT >But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE >they believed HIV caused AIDS? What an absurd comment. No one has died because they BELIEVED HIV causes AIDS...but many have died of AIDS because that's the condtion that arises among most people infected with HIV.
Unless there is treatment. Failure to treat properly almost invariably leads to death. As it did with David as he believed your lies and delayed treatment til it was too late. He ignored the warning signs and opportunistic infections til near the very end.
And he died. And his death if it should mean anything (as any of our lives or deaths should mean anything) is to serve as a clarion call for denialists to pull their heads out of the sand and stop the lies.
George M. Carter
Susie, age 9 - 05 Jan 2006 19:45 GMT >>But George, what about the legions of people who died BECAUSE >>they believed HIV caused AIDS? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Unless there is treatment. Failure to treat properly almost invariably > leads to death. But treating people leads to salvation?
LOL
susie
========== Early ARV Treatment = NO BENEFIT
After years of promoting "early ARV" treatment as "life-saving", the pharma shills on this newsgroup are STILL biting their tongues over the July 2004 revision of the HIV Standard of Care as published in JAMA:
"For less severely compromised individuals (ie, asymptomatic individuals with CD4 cell counts > 200/microL), there are no definitive data from prospective, randomized controlled studies to determine when antiretroviral therapy is associated with a survival benefit."
My favorite parts are the disclosures about the outrageous conflicts of interest by the doctors who have been misleading about HIV treatment since the first AZT studies.
____
In the 7/14/04 JAMA article titled "Treatment for Adult HIV Infection:
2004 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel," Yeni et al. state:
"Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a survival benefit with the use of antiretroviral therapy by patients with severe immunodeficiency. For less severely compromised individuals (ie, asymptomatic individuals with CD4 cell counts > 200/microL), there are no definitive data from prospective, randomized controlled studies to determine when antiretroviral therapy is associated with a survival benefit. In the absence of such data, the decision to initiate therapy should be made based on survival and disease progression information obtained from observational studies, the consequences of moderate degrees of immune deficiency, and the long-term safety of antiretroviral drugs."
---------------------------------
JAMA.2004 Jul 14;292:251-265.
Treatment for Adult HIV Infection
2004 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel
Patrick G. Yeni, MD; Scott M. Hammer, MD; Martin S. Hirsch, MD; Michael S. Saag, MD; Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD; Charles C. J. Carpenter, MD; Margaret A. Fischl, MD; Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD; Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD; Donna M. Jacobsen, BS; David A. Katzenstein, MD; Julio S. G. Montaner, MD; Douglas D. Richman, MD; Robert T. Schooley, MD; Melanie A. Thompson, MD; Stefano Vella, MD; Paul A. Volberding, MD
Abstract: Context Substantial changes in the field of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment have occurred in the last 2 years, prompting revision of the guidelines for antiretroviral management of adults with established HIV infection.
Objective To update recommendations for physicians who provide HIV care regarding when to start antiretroviral therapy, what drugs to start with, when to change drug regimens, and what drug regimens to switch to after therapy fails.
Data Sources Evidence was identified and reviewed by a 16-member noncompensated panel of physicians with expertise in HIV-related basic science and clinical research, antiretroviral therapy, and HIV patient care. The panel was designed to have broad US and international representation for areas with adequate access to antiretroviral management.
Study Selection Evidence considered included published basic science, clinical research, and epidemiological data (identified by experts in the field or extracted through MEDLINE searches using terms relevant to antiretroviral therapy) and abstracts from HIV-oriented scientific conferences between July 2002 and May 2004.
Data Extraction Data were reviewed to identify any information that might change previous guidelines. Based on panel discussion, guidelines were drafted by a writing committee and discussed by the panel until consensus was reached.
Data Synthesis Four antiretroviral drugs recently have been made available and have broadened the options for initial and subsequent regimens. New data allow more definitive recommendations for specific drugs or regimens to include or avoid, particularly with regard to initial therapy. Recommendations are rated according to 7 evidence categories, ranging from I (data from prospective randomized clinical trials) to VII (expert opinion of the panel).
Conclusion Further insights into the roles of drug toxic effects, drug resistance, and pharmacological interactions have resulted in additional guidance for strategic approaches to antiretroviral management.
Author Affiliations: Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, X. Bichat Medical School, Paris, France (Dr Yeni); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (Dr Hammer); Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Hirsch); Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham (Dr Saag); Department of Preventive Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (Dr Schechter); Department of Biomedicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI (Dr Carpenter); Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla (Dr Fischl); Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (Dr Gatell); Department of HIV Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, England (Dr Gazzard); International AIDS Society-USA, San Francisco, Calif (Ms Jacobsen); Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (Dr Katzenstein); Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Dr Montaner); Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of California and San Diego VA Healthcare System, San Diego (Dr Richman); Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver (Dr Schooley); AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta, Ga (Dr Thompson); Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy (Dr Vella); Department of Medicine, University of California and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco (Dr Volberding).
=================================================== Financial disclosures of AIDS researchers - 7/14/04 JAMA
JAMA, July 14, 2004 Vol 292, No. 2 251-265
Treatment for Adult 2004 Recommendations International AIDS Society- USA Panel
Patrick G. Yeni, MD Scott M. Hammer, MD Martin S. Hirsch, MD Michael S. Saag, MD Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD Charles C. J. Carpenter, MD Margaret A. Fischl, MD Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD Donna M. Jacobsen, BS David A. Katzenstein, MD Julio S. G. Montaner, MD Douglas D. Richman, MD Robert T. Schooley, MD Melanie A. Thompson, MD Stefano Vella, MD Paul A. Volberding, MD Patrick G. Yeni, MD
Dr Yeni has received research grants for site investigator from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol- Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Tibotec/Virco, and Gilead.
Dr Yeni has received honoraria for advisory positions and lecture sponsorships from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Tibotec/Virco, and Merck Sharp and Dohme.
Scott M. Hammer, MD
Dr Hammer has received research grants for site investigator from Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck.
Dr Hammer has been a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Shionogi, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Shire, Gilead, and Tibotec/ Virco.
Martin S. Hirsch, MD
Dr Hirsch has received research support from Takeda.
Dr Hirsch has been a consultant for Schering Plough, GlaxoSmithKline, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Michael S. Saag, MD
Dr Saag has received research support from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho Biotech/Johnson&Johnson, Pfizer/Agouron, and Hoffmann- LaRoche.
Dr Saag has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, OrthoBiotech/Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer/Agouron, Roche, Schering-Plough, Shire Pharmaceutical, TherapyEdge, Tibotec/ Virco, Trimeria, Vertex, and ViroLogic.
Dr Saag has received honoraria for positions on the speakers bureau for Abbott Laboratories, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, OrthoBiotech, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Agouron, Roche, Schering-Plough, Shire Pharmaceutical, TherapyEdge, Tibotec/Virco, Trimeria, Vertex, and ViroLogic.
Margaret A. Fischl, MD
Dr Fischl has received research grants from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, and Ortho Biotech.
Dr Fischl has received honoraria for continuing medical education programs from GlaxoSmithKline.
Dr Fischl has served as an advisor for Agouron Pharmaceuticals and GlaxoSmithKline.
Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD
Dr Gazzard has received research grants from Abbott Laboratories, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Johnson &Johnson.
Julio S. G. Montaner, MD
Dr Montaner has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Shire Biochemical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DuPont Pharma, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Kucera Pharmaceutical, Merck Frosst Laboratories, Pharmacia & Upjohn, and Trimeris.
Dr Montaner has received honoraria for speaking from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Shire Biochemical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DuPont Pharma, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Kucera Pharmaceutical, Merck Frosst Laboratories, Pharmacia & Upjohn, and Trimeris Inc.
Dr Montaner holds 2 US patents, one regarding use of nevirapine and another regarding pharmacological applications of mitochondrial DNA assays. Dr Montaner has 2 patent applications that are pending, one regarding pharmacological applications of mitochondrial DNA assays and another regarding sepsis.
Robert T. Schooley, MD
Dr Schooley has received grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Tibotec/Virco.
Dr Schooley has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Pfizer, Hoffmann-LaRoche, GlaxoSmithKline, BristolMyers Squibb, Merck, Vertex, ViroLogic, and Tibotec/Virco.
Melanie A. Thompson, MD
Dr Thompson has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/ Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiron Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Merck Research Laboratories, Oxo-Chemie, Roche, Serono, Theratechnologies, Triangle Pharmaceuticals, Trimeris, and VaxGen.
Dr Thompson has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Serono, and Triangle Pharmaceuticals.
Dr Thompson has received honoraria for lecture sponsorships and continuing medical education from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/ Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Boeringer Ingleheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Serono, Triangle Pharmaceuticals, and Trimeris.
Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD
Dr Schechter has received honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Roche.
Dr Schechter has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, BristolMyers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Roche.
Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD
Dr Gatell has served in advisory positions for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott Laboratories, Tibotec/ Virco.
Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD
Dr Gazzard has received lectureship fees from Abbott Laboratories, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Johnson & Johnson.
David A. Katzenstein, MD
Dr Katzenstein has held advisory positions at Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, ViroLogic, Visible Genetics, and the Doris Duke Charitable Trust.
Dr Katzenstein holds a US patent for polymerase chain reaction assays monitoring antiviral therapy and making therapeutic decisions in the treatment of AIDS.
Stefano Vella, MD
Dr Vella has received lecture sponsorship for satellite symposia and continuing medical education programs from Merck, Agouron, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche.
Paul A. Volberding, MD
Dr Volberding has received honoraria from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Boehringer Ingelheim.
Dr Volberding has been a consultant for Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Shire.
Douglas D. Richman, MD
Dr Richman has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiron, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novirio, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Triangle, and ViroLogic.
Corresponding Author: Patrick G. Yeni, MD, Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 Rue Henri-Huchard, 75877 Paris Cedex 18, France (Patrick.Yeni@Bch .Ap-Hop-Paris.Fr).
|
|
|