Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / December 2005
PharmaNannies take note: early treatment doesn't work!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Susie, age 9 - 16 Dec 2005 17:06 GMT While few here think of the pharmaceutical mission as one of a "Nanny State", perhaps it should be seen as such, especially when, for years, many doctors were refusing to treat HIV patients who wouldn't take the "life-saving" antivirals for the purpose of delaying the onset of AIDS.
Now we know that those drugs never delayed the onset of anything (see IAS standard of care below), what the HIV doctor/ HIV patient has become is nothing short of a nanny state.
Thus, we MUST view the PharmApologists as our Nannies.
Perhaps Tucker Carlson has some rare insights (that is, for his right-wing-challenged brain) about seatbelts and the Nanny state:
Taking on the 'Nanny' state (Tucker Carlson)
December 15, 2005 9:09 a.m. ET http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10284169/#051215a
Of all the crackpot things I've said in public over the years, nothing has elicited more hate mail than the time I came out against seatbelts. It was about five years ago, and I was giving a ride to a reporter from People magazine. We were crossing Capitol Hill in my elderly Volvo when she remarked upon the fact I was violating the law by not wearing my seatbelt. That's right, I said, and launched into a lecture about the tyranny of the nanny state. I can't remember if I actually quoted Patrick Henry. I do remember I got pretty hot. She put it in her magazine.
Within hours of publication I had dozens of calls and e-mails from angry, self-righteous strangers demanding to know how I dared - dared! -- say something unkind about seatbelts. They save lives! Are you against saving lives? Are you for traffic deaths? You monster!
I'm not against saving lives, of course, or even against seatbelts. I wore mine once, in a snowstorm in Connecticut in 1988. In the end I didn't crash, so the seatbelt didn't work. Plus it wrinkled my shirt. I haven't made the same mistake again.
But enough about me. The point is not that seatbelts are bad or that I don't care for them, but that seatbelt laws are insulting to the American spirit. Should the state really protect competent adults from themselves? And if so, what's the message of punishing someone for ignoring his own safety? Protect yourself or we'll kill you?
Seatbelt laws are ludicrous and infuriating, exactly the sort of thoughtless, petty harassment that got Sam Adams so worked up. Unfortunately, 230 years later, no one seems to care.
12/14: The Situation's Tucker Carlson speaks to a man on a mission to make seatbelts optional.
Kenneth Prazak has spent two years and $2,000 fighting a $25 ticket for not wearing a seatbelt. Except for Kenneth Prazak. Kenneth Prazak cares. The 53-year-old Illinois man spent two years and more than $2,000 fighting a $25 seatbelt violation. Prazak wasn't speeding or driving recklessly or endangering the lives of other motorists when he was pulled over. As he put it, "I was just minding my own business driving down the road." In the end, members of the jury didn't care. They ruled against him. Yet in the process of fighting his lost cause, Prazak made a stirring case for personal freedom.
Kenneth Prazak was a guest on the show Wednesay, and there's no doubt in my mind that a lot of viewers will hate him. Many others will write him off as a crank. They have a point. By conventional standards, Prazak is a crank. Ordinary people would rather suffer indignities at the hands of the state than be considered weird by their friends. But every generation raises up individuals willing to think for themselves, people who've decided they're not going to pay the tea tax, who've had it with sitting at the rear of the bus. Society doesn't always welcome people like this; they tend to be difficult. But history usually rewards them.
So mock Kenneth Prazak if you will. But before you do, see if you can argue with the reasoning of his closing argument: "The real issue here is, who owns your life? Is it yours or is it government's?" His conclusion: "If government makes my choice for me, I am no longer free."
Melodramatic? Sure it is. But that doesn't mean it's not true. Keep in mind, small laws add up to big tyrannies.
========== Early ARV Treatment = NO BENEFIT
After years of promoting "early ARV" treatment as "life-saving", the pharma shills on this newsgroup are STILL biting their tongues over the July 2004 revision of the HIV Standard of Care as published in JAMA:
"For less severely compromised individuals (ie, asymptomatic individuals with CD4 cell counts > 200/microL), there are no definitive data from prospective, randomized controlled studies to determine when antiretroviral therapy is associated with a survival benefit."
My favorite parts are the disclosures about the outrageous conflicts of interest by the doctors who have been misleading about HIV treatment since the first AZT studies.
Enjoy!
susie ____
In the 7/14/04 JAMA article titled "Treatment for Adult HIV Infection:
2004 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel," Yeni et al. state:
"Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a survival benefit with the use of antiretroviral therapy by patients with severe immunodeficiency. For less severely compromised individuals (ie, asymptomatic individuals with CD4 cell counts > 200/microL), there are no definitive data from prospective, randomized controlled studies to determine when antiretroviral therapy is associated with a survival benefit. In the absence of such data, the decision to initiate therapy should be made based on survival and disease progression information obtained from observational studies, the consequences of moderate degrees of immune deficiency, and the long-term safety of antiretroviral drugs."
---------------------------------
JAMA.2004 Jul 14;292:251-265.
Treatment for Adult HIV Infection
2004 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel
Patrick G. Yeni, MD; Scott M. Hammer, MD; Martin S. Hirsch, MD; Michael S. Saag, MD; Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD; Charles C. J. Carpenter, MD; Margaret A. Fischl, MD; Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD; Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD; Donna M. Jacobsen, BS; David A. Katzenstein, MD; Julio S. G. Montaner, MD; Douglas D. Richman, MD; Robert T. Schooley, MD; Melanie A. Thompson, MD; Stefano Vella, MD; Paul A. Volberding, MD
Abstract: Context Substantial changes in the field of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment have occurred in the last 2 years, prompting revision of the guidelines for antiretroviral management of adults with established HIV infection.
Objective To update recommendations for physicians who provide HIV care regarding when to start antiretroviral therapy, what drugs to start with, when to change drug regimens, and what drug regimens to switch to after therapy fails.
Data Sources Evidence was identified and reviewed by a 16-member noncompensated panel of physicians with expertise in HIV-related basic science and clinical research, antiretroviral therapy, and HIV patient care. The panel was designed to have broad US and international representation for areas with adequate access to antiretroviral management.
Study Selection Evidence considered included published basic science, clinical research, and epidemiological data (identified by experts in the field or extracted through MEDLINE searches using terms relevant to antiretroviral therapy) and abstracts from HIV-oriented scientific conferences between July 2002 and May 2004.
Data Extraction Data were reviewed to identify any information that might change previous guidelines. Based on panel discussion, guidelines were drafted by a writing committee and discussed by the panel until consensus was reached.
Data Synthesis Four antiretroviral drugs recently have been made available and have broadened the options for initial and subsequent regimens. New data allow more definitive recommendations for specific drugs or regimens to include or avoid, particularly with regard to initial therapy. Recommendations are rated according to 7 evidence categories, ranging from I (data from prospective randomized clinical trials) to VII (expert opinion of the panel).
Conclusion Further insights into the roles of drug toxic effects, drug resistance, and pharmacological interactions have resulted in additional guidance for strategic approaches to antiretroviral management.
Author Affiliations: Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, X. Bichat Medical School, Paris, France (Dr Yeni); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (Dr Hammer); Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Hirsch); Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham (Dr Saag); Department of Preventive Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (Dr Schechter); Department of Biomedicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI (Dr Carpenter); Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla (Dr Fischl); Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (Dr Gatell); Department of HIV Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, England (Dr Gazzard); International AIDS Society-USA, San Francisco, Calif (Ms Jacobsen); Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (Dr Katzenstein); Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Dr Montaner); Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of California and San Diego VA Healthcare System, San Diego (Dr Richman); Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver (Dr Schooley); AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta, Ga (Dr Thompson); Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy (Dr Vella); Department of Medicine, University of California and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco (Dr Volberding).
=================================================== Financial disclosures of AIDS researchers - 7/14/04 JAMA
JAMA, July 14, 2004 Vol 292, No. 2 251-265
Treatment for Adult 2004 Recommendations International AIDS Society- USA Panel
Patrick G. Yeni, MD Scott M. Hammer, MD Martin S. Hirsch, MD Michael S. Saag, MD Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD Charles C. J. Carpenter, MD Margaret A. Fischl, MD Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD Donna M. Jacobsen, BS David A. Katzenstein, MD Julio S. G. Montaner, MD Douglas D. Richman, MD Robert T. Schooley, MD Melanie A. Thompson, MD Stefano Vella, MD Paul A. Volberding, MD Patrick G. Yeni, MD
Dr Yeni has received research grants for site investigator from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol- Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Tibotec/Virco, and Gilead.
Dr Yeni has received honoraria for advisory positions and lecture sponsorships from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Tibotec/Virco, and Merck Sharp and Dohme.
Scott M. Hammer, MD
Dr Hammer has received research grants for site investigator from Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck.
Dr Hammer has been a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Shionogi, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Shire, Gilead, and Tibotec/ Virco.
Martin S. Hirsch, MD
Dr Hirsch has received research support from Takeda.
Dr Hirsch has been a consultant for Schering Plough, GlaxoSmithKline, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Michael S. Saag, MD
Dr Saag has received research support from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho Biotech/Johnson&Johnson, Pfizer/Agouron, and Hoffmann- LaRoche.
Dr Saag has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, OrthoBiotech/Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer/Agouron, Roche, Schering-Plough, Shire Pharmaceutical, TherapyEdge, Tibotec/ Virco, Trimeria, Vertex, and ViroLogic.
Dr Saag has received honoraria for positions on the speakers bureau for Abbott Laboratories, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, OrthoBiotech, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Agouron, Roche, Schering-Plough, Shire Pharmaceutical, TherapyEdge, Tibotec/Virco, Trimeria, Vertex, and ViroLogic.
Margaret A. Fischl, MD
Dr Fischl has received research grants from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, and Ortho Biotech.
Dr Fischl has received honoraria for continuing medical education programs from GlaxoSmithKline.
Dr Fischl has served as an advisor for Agouron Pharmaceuticals and GlaxoSmithKline.
Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD
Dr Gazzard has received research grants from Abbott Laboratories, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Johnson &Johnson.
Julio S. G. Montaner, MD
Dr Montaner has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Shire Biochemical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DuPont Pharma, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Kucera Pharmaceutical, Merck Frosst Laboratories, Pharmacia & Upjohn, and Trimeris.
Dr Montaner has received honoraria for speaking from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Shire Biochemical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DuPont Pharma, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Kucera Pharmaceutical, Merck Frosst Laboratories, Pharmacia & Upjohn, and Trimeris Inc.
Dr Montaner holds 2 US patents, one regarding use of nevirapine and another regarding pharmacological applications of mitochondrial DNA assays. Dr Montaner has 2 patent applications that are pending, one regarding pharmacological applications of mitochondrial DNA assays and another regarding sepsis.
Robert T. Schooley, MD
Dr Schooley has received grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Tibotec/Virco.
Dr Schooley has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Pfizer, Hoffmann-LaRoche, GlaxoSmithKline, BristolMyers Squibb, Merck, Vertex, ViroLogic, and Tibotec/Virco.
Melanie A. Thompson, MD
Dr Thompson has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/ Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiron Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Merck Research Laboratories, Oxo-Chemie, Roche, Serono, Theratechnologies, Triangle Pharmaceuticals, Trimeris, and VaxGen.
Dr Thompson has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Serono, and Triangle Pharmaceuticals.
Dr Thompson has received honoraria for lecture sponsorships and continuing medical education from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/ Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Boeringer Ingleheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Serono, Triangle Pharmaceuticals, and Trimeris.
Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD
Dr Schechter has received honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Roche.
Dr Schechter has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, BristolMyers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Roche.
Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD
Dr Gatell has served in advisory positions for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott Laboratories, Tibotec/ Virco.
Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD
Dr Gazzard has received lectureship fees from Abbott Laboratories, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Johnson & Johnson.
David A. Katzenstein, MD
Dr Katzenstein has held advisory positions at Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, ViroLogic, Visible Genetics, and the Doris Duke Charitable Trust.
Dr Katzenstein holds a US patent for polymerase chain reaction assays monitoring antiviral therapy and making therapeutic decisions in the treatment of AIDS.
Stefano Vella, MD
Dr Vella has received lecture sponsorship for satellite symposia and continuing medical education programs from Merck, Agouron, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche.
Paul A. Volberding, MD
Dr Volberding has received honoraria from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Boehringer Ingelheim.
Dr Volberding has been a consultant for Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Shire.
Douglas D. Richman, MD
Dr Richman has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiron, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novirio, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Triangle, and ViroLogic.
Corresponding Author: Patrick G. Yeni, MD, Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 Rue Henri-Huchard, 75877 Paris Cedex 18, France (Patrick.Yeni@Bch .Ap-Hop-Paris.Fr).
wilyretrovirus - 16 Dec 2005 19:23 GMT While few here think of the pharmaceutical mission as one of a "Nanny State", perhaps it should be seen as such, especially when, for years, many doctors were refusing to treat HIV patients who wouldn't take the "life-saving" antivirals for the purpose of delaying the onset of AIDS.
Now we know that those drugs never delayed the onset of anything (see IAS standard of care below), what the HIV doctor/ HIV patient has become is nothing short of a nanny state.
========== Early ARV Treatment = NO BENEFIT
After years of promoting "early ARV" treatment as "life-saving", the pharma shills on this newsgroup are STILL biting their tongues over the July 2004 revision of the HIV Standard of Care as published in JAMA:
"For less severely compromised individuals (ie, asymptomatic individuals with CD4 cell counts > 200/microL), there are no definitive data from prospective, randomized controlled studies to determine when antiretroviral therapy is associated with a survival benefit."
My favorite parts are the disclosures about the outrageous conflicts of interest by the doctors who have been misleading about HIV treatment since the first AZT studies.
Enjoy!
susie ____
In the 7/14/04 JAMA article titled "Treatment for Adult HIV Infection:
2004 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel," Yeni et al. state:
"Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a survival benefit with the use of antiretroviral therapy by patients with severe immunodeficiency. For less severely compromised individuals (ie, asymptomatic individuals with CD4 cell counts > 200/microL), there are no definitive data from prospective, randomized controlled studies to determine when antiretroviral therapy is associated with a survival benefit. In the absence of such data, the decision to initiate therapy should be made based on survival and disease progression information obtained from observational studies, the consequences of moderate degrees of immune deficiency, and the long-term safety of antiretroviral drugs."
---------------------------------
JAMA.2004 Jul 14;292:251-265.
Treatment for Adult HIV Infection
2004 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel
Patrick G. Yeni, MD; Scott M. Hammer, MD; Martin S. Hirsch, MD; Michael S. Saag, MD; Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD; Charles C. J. Carpenter, MD; Margaret A. Fischl, MD; Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD; Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD; Donna M. Jacobsen, BS; David A. Katzenstein, MD; Julio S. G. Montaner, MD; Douglas D. Richman, MD; Robert T. Schooley, MD; Melanie A. Thompson, MD; Stefano Vella, MD; Paul A. Volberding, MD
Abstract: Context Substantial changes in the field of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment have occurred in the last 2 years, prompting revision of the guidelines for antiretroviral management of adults with established HIV infection.
Objective To update recommendations for physicians who provide HIV care regarding when to start antiretroviral therapy, what drugs to start with, when to change drug regimens, and what drug regimens to switch to after therapy fails.
Data Sources Evidence was identified and reviewed by a 16-member noncompensated panel of physicians with expertise in HIV-related basic science and clinical research, antiretroviral therapy, and HIV patient care. The panel was designed to have broad US and international representation for areas with adequate access to antiretroviral management.
Study Selection Evidence considered included published basic science, clinical research, and epidemiological data (identified by experts in the field or extracted through MEDLINE searches using terms relevant to antiretroviral therapy) and abstracts from HIV-oriented scientific conferences between July 2002 and May 2004.
Data Extraction Data were reviewed to identify any information that might change previous guidelines. Based on panel discussion, guidelines were drafted by a writing committee and discussed by the panel until consensus was reached.
Data Synthesis Four antiretroviral drugs recently have been made available and have broadened the options for initial and subsequent regimens. New data allow more definitive recommendations for specific drugs or regimens to include or avoid, particularly with regard to initial therapy. Recommendations are rated according to 7 evidence categories, ranging from I (data from prospective randomized clinical trials) to VII (expert opinion of the panel).
Conclusion Further insights into the roles of drug toxic effects, drug resistance, and pharmacological interactions have resulted in additional guidance for strategic approaches to antiretroviral management.
Author Affiliations: Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, X. Bichat Medical School, Paris, France (Dr Yeni); Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (Dr Hammer); Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Hirsch); Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham (Dr Saag); Department of Preventive Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (Dr Schechter); Department of Biomedicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI (Dr Carpenter); Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla (Dr Fischl); Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (Dr Gatell); Department of HIV Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, England (Dr Gazzard); International AIDS Society-USA, San Francisco, Calif (Ms Jacobsen); Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (Dr Katzenstein); Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Dr Montaner); Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of California and San Diego VA Healthcare System, San Diego (Dr Richman); Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver (Dr Schooley); AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta, Ga (Dr Thompson); Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy (Dr Vella); Department of Medicine, University of California and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco (Dr Volberding).
=================================================== Financial disclosures of AIDS researchers - 7/14/04 JAMA
JAMA, July 14, 2004 Vol 292, No. 2 251-265
Treatment for Adult 2004 Recommendations International AIDS Society- USA Panel
Patrick G. Yeni, MD Scott M. Hammer, MD Martin S. Hirsch, MD Michael S. Saag, MD Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD Charles C. J. Carpenter, MD Margaret A. Fischl, MD Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD Donna M. Jacobsen, BS David A. Katzenstein, MD Julio S. G. Montaner, MD Douglas D. Richman, MD Robert T. Schooley, MD Melanie A. Thompson, MD Stefano Vella, MD Paul A. Volberding, MD Patrick G. Yeni, MD
Dr Yeni has received research grants for site investigator from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol- Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Tibotec/Virco, and Gilead.
Dr Yeni has received honoraria for advisory positions and lecture sponsorships from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Tibotec/Virco, and Merck Sharp and Dohme.
Scott M. Hammer, MD
Dr Hammer has received research grants for site investigator from Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck.
Dr Hammer has been a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Shionogi, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Shire, Gilead, and Tibotec/ Virco.
Martin S. Hirsch, MD
Dr Hirsch has received research support from Takeda.
Dr Hirsch has been a consultant for Schering Plough, GlaxoSmithKline, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Michael S. Saag, MD
Dr Saag has received research support from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho Biotech/Johnson&Johnson, Pfizer/Agouron, and Hoffmann- LaRoche.
Dr Saag has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, OrthoBiotech/Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer/Agouron, Roche, Schering-Plough, Shire Pharmaceutical, TherapyEdge, Tibotec/ Virco, Trimeria, Vertex, and ViroLogic.
Dr Saag has received honoraria for positions on the speakers bureau for Abbott Laboratories, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, OrthoBiotech, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Agouron, Roche, Schering-Plough, Shire Pharmaceutical, TherapyEdge, Tibotec/Virco, Trimeria, Vertex, and ViroLogic.
Margaret A. Fischl, MD
Dr Fischl has received research grants from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, and Ortho Biotech.
Dr Fischl has received honoraria for continuing medical education programs from GlaxoSmithKline.
Dr Fischl has served as an advisor for Agouron Pharmaceuticals and GlaxoSmithKline.
Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD
Dr Gazzard has received research grants from Abbott Laboratories, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Johnson &Johnson.
Julio S. G. Montaner, MD
Dr Montaner has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Shire Biochemical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DuPont Pharma, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Kucera Pharmaceutical, Merck Frosst Laboratories, Pharmacia & Upjohn, and Trimeris.
Dr Montaner has received honoraria for speaking from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Shire Biochemical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DuPont Pharma, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Kucera Pharmaceutical, Merck Frosst Laboratories, Pharmacia & Upjohn, and Trimeris Inc.
Dr Montaner holds 2 US patents, one regarding use of nevirapine and another regarding pharmacological applications of mitochondrial DNA assays. Dr Montaner has 2 patent applications that are pending, one regarding pharmacological applications of mitochondrial DNA assays and another regarding sepsis.
Robert T. Schooley, MD
Dr Schooley has received grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Tibotec/Virco.
Dr Schooley has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Pfizer, Hoffmann-LaRoche, GlaxoSmithKline, BristolMyers Squibb, Merck, Vertex, ViroLogic, and Tibotec/Virco.
Melanie A. Thompson, MD
Dr Thompson has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/ Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiron Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Merck Research Laboratories, Oxo-Chemie, Roche, Serono, Theratechnologies, Triangle Pharmaceuticals, Trimeris, and VaxGen.
Dr Thompson has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Serono, and Triangle Pharmaceuticals.
Dr Thompson has received honoraria for lecture sponsorships and continuing medical education from Abbott Laboratories, Agouron/ Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Boeringer Ingleheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Serono, Triangle Pharmaceuticals, and Trimeris.
Mauro Schechter, MD, PhD
Dr Schechter has received honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Roche.
Dr Schechter has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, BristolMyers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Roche.
Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD
Dr Gatell has served in advisory positions for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott Laboratories, Tibotec/ Virco.
Brian G. Gazzard, MA, MD
Dr Gazzard has received lectureship fees from Abbott Laboratories, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Johnson & Johnson.
David A. Katzenstein, MD
Dr Katzenstein has held advisory positions at Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, ViroLogic, Visible Genetics, and the Doris Duke Charitable Trust.
Dr Katzenstein holds a US patent for polymerase chain reaction assays monitoring antiviral therapy and making therapeutic decisions in the treatment of AIDS.
Stefano Vella, MD
Dr Vella has received lecture sponsorship for satellite symposia and continuing medical education programs from Merck, Agouron, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche.
Paul A. Volberding, MD
Dr Volberding has received honoraria from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Boehringer Ingelheim.
Dr Volberding has been a consultant for Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Shire.
Douglas D. Richman, MD
Dr Richman has been a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiron, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novirio, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Triangle, and ViroLogic.
Corresponding Author: Patrick G. Yeni, MD, Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 Rue Henri-Huchard, 75877 Paris Cedex 18, France (Patrick.Yeni@Bch .Ap-Hop-Paris.Fr).
Susie, thanks for all the great information. As far as "conflict of interest"...that's a euphemism at best. Also, this is only the sh.t they'll ADMIT TO!!
Iconoclaster - 19 Dec 2005 23:23 GMT Interesting. But I was ahead of Tucker Carlson by at least 5 years. But that doesn't surprise me; I've been ahead of my time all my life. I wrote about seatbelts in 1995, in my (now popular) e-book "The Moronic Majority", published om my website. The nanny state is the darling of the political left. Making money by exploiting people, on the other hand, is very popular with th political right. In "The Moronic Majority", I pointed out that seatbelts are really devices to save insurance companies money. If you crash with your car, and you didn't wear the damn thing, the insurance company has a good excuse for not paying up. As this "benefit" is hard to explain to the public, the pecunious right convinces the impecunious left that the purpose of seatbelts is to save lives... and everybody believes it! Now isn't that clever?
Now let's move from seatbelts to ARV's: The real benefit of those poisons lies of course with the pharma barons, belonging to the political right. But these clever plutocrats have succeeded in convincing mentally underprivileged leftists such as... well, we all know who they are, that ARV's save lives. And these plodding boneheads make it their life's work to advocate the idea that everybody should have access to these infernal poisons. The Left doing the Right's dirty work! Imagine that! Macchiavelli, eat your heart out! People wasting their lives, making Big Pharma richer, all the while thinking they are saving lives... I can't believe it! I'll ask Peter Hilter to write a fairy tale about this scheme. This must be preserved for posterity.
Gary Stein - 20 Dec 2005 18:05 GMT > Interesting. But I was ahead of Tucker Carlson by at least 5 years. But > that doesn't surprise me; I've been ahead of my time all my life. I wrote [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > convinces the impecunious left that the purpose of seatbelts is to save > lives... and everybody believes it! Now isn't that clever? So the reduction in the number of fatal accidents as a percentage of all accidents (i.e. there are less fatalities per 100 accidents in 2005 then there were in 1975) that has been seen since the advent of seat belts and airbags is all falsified statistics put out by the insurance companies. By the way insurance companies in most states are required to pay claims regardless of seat belt use or air bag deployment.
Gary Stein
Iconoclaster - 21 Dec 2005 01:08 GMT >"So the reduction in the number of fatal accidents as a percentage of all accidents (i.e. there are less fatalities per 100 accidents in 2005 then there were in 1975) that has been seen since the advent of seat belts and airbags is all falsified statistics put out by the insurance companies." ?
Not necessarily. But whenever "proof" of anything is based on statistics, you will invariably find that they're shifting back and forth between absolute numbers and percentages, whatever fits their agenda. In this case, percentages are used. That could still mean that the annual number of fatalities increased, and I'll bet it did. There are other variables except seatbelts, though. Since 1975 the legal alcohol promillage has been lowered in a number of states. Also, traffic jams have increased (did you check the I-95 lately?) These traffic jams mean: More light accidents (fender benders) and less high-speed crashes. It's always the same story: Many variables, but only one of them is picked out, just to prove a pre-conceived conclusion.
But if you had read "The Moronic Majority" (Don't! Your blood pressure may do you in), you would know that I am not really advising people not to use seatbelts. The point I make there is that they are touted as a device to save lives, but the real reason they are being forced upon us is to benefit the insurance companies. Now if there really are states that require these companies to pay out, regardless of whether you have used seat belts or air bags, as you say (I've never lived in any of those states), then only the state or the city benefits from seatbelt laws. The police can write more tickets. In any case: If anything at all is presented to you that's supposed to protect your life: Don't believe the bastards!
|
|
|