Antiviral Obituaries Dec 1 2005 - Bay Area Reporter (San Franciso gay paper)

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Susie, age 9 - 02 Dec 2005 17:27 GMT

Are the "antiviral" drugs keeping people alive?

Or are they helping them go "peacefully" (#1) or
"suddenly" (#2 & #3)?

Let's see...

http://www.ebar.com/obituaries/

Four deaths listed this week.

OBITUARIES Bay Area Reporter, Dec 1, 2005

1 Arthur Ray Baker

Born in Crescent City, California on December 28, 1960,
passed peacefully on November 15, 2005, at an Oklahoma City
medical center with his loving companion and a close ...

2 Salem Joseph Buchholz

recently passed away at his home. His sudden death was
attributed to heart failure with complications related to
diabetes and HIV. He was 58 years of age.

Jon B. Johnson

A friend has suddenly passed away, peacefully in his sleep
during the night. Sweet dreams, dear Jon, sweet dreams. His
ashes are scattered at sea, as he had wished, and we ...

Victor Swedosh

passed away August 7, 2005 due to complications from his
17-year struggle with HTLV-1, a non-HIV viral disease that
begins with the victim's loss of motor function in ...

Reply to this Message

DavidT - 02 Dec 2005 18:33 GMT

Sorry I missed the bit where it says they were on HIV drugs.
And one of them wasn't even HIV positive.

More incisive observations from miss Susie sockpuppet with the mental
age of a 9 year old.

Reply to this Message

Susie, age 9 - 03 Dec 2005 21:08 GMT

> Sorry I missed the bit where it says they were on HIV drugs.

Exactly the point. Other than references to HIV, half of these
guys died "suddenly". Read between the lines and maybe you
can figure it out on your own.

Read between the lines - the antivirals have been proven to
kill off those that are "saved" from AIDS.

> And one of them wasn't even HIV positive.

What's the matter, HTLV-1 isn't close enough for you?

susie

Reply to this Message

DavidT - 05 Dec 2005 10:39 GMT

Your intention was to implicate anti-HIV drugs in the deaths of 4
people.
One of them didn't even have HIV, and there is nothing to say any of
the others were even on treatment.

Accuracy is obviously another one of your weak points.
And of course, no-one dies from diseases anymore do they - its always
the treatment they are taking for their ill health that actually killed
them, isn't it.

Does Eliza-Jane Scoville's obituary send you into a rant about HIV
drugs causing her death? (mind you, I wouldn't be at all surprised to
find Al-Bayati has suggested she was being surreptitiously fed these in
her water supply - at least that would be as believable as his latest
theory as to why she died).

Reply to this Message

Susie, age 9 - 05 Dec 2005 20:14 GMT

> Your intention was to implicate anti-HIV drugs in the deaths of 4
> people.

Three people for sure, possibly four.

> One of them didn't even have HIV,

HTLV-1. Don't you think this person was being treated?

> and there is nothing to say any of
> the others were even on treatment.

Sure there is, especially given the intense peer pressure to
be on these drugs in San Francisco.

> Accuracy is obviously another one of your weak points.

You are certainly in denial and many here can probably
figure out why.

The brainwashing has been thorough, if not complete.

susie

Reply to this Message