Don, it is nice to see you posting again.
> Rapid AIDS tests that yield results in 20 minutes..
have their place, I suppose, but I am not sure when
such a test is effective over other tests.
> Those who never learned that they had tested positive most
> likely went on to infect others.....
who were too trusting and never bothered to use safe sex
practices 100 percent of the time.
> ....through unprotected sex or by
> sharing needles during intravenous drug use.
> Despite widely available testing, about a quarter of the
> Americans who are infected with H.I.V. still don't know it.
And with good reason. A football player in Canada is charged with
aggravated sexual assault because he did not disclose his HIV
status.
While everyone should disclose their positive status, not knowing
eliminates being criminally charged as was done in this case. Why
would
any one, in this case, a woman have unprotected sex with any man
whom
she does not know?
> That will no doubt change when the
> Food and Drug Administration approves a
> quick over-the-counter AIDS test for home use.
>
> No company has yet filed for approval of such a test.
I understand the test up to now deliver fairly unstable results.
> But exploratory hearings conducted recently by the
> F.D.A. suggest that such a request may be filed soon.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> to medical care and explain the precautions that are needed to
> avoid infecting others.
In an ideal world that would be perfect. But don't insurance
companies
exclude hiv + or people infected with aids from coverage or
continued
coverage? So what medical care would be available to AIDS
patients?
> But it has long been clear that many people who suspect that
> they have been infected do not feel comfortable walking into
> AIDS clinics - or even confiding in family doctors.
Are AIDS clinics free and do they treat patients with unlimited
free drugs and care or is their only purpose to test for disease
and send you into the cruel world to get non-existent free
treatment
and health care?
> An over-the-counter AIDS test is the ideal tool for reaching
> them, as well as large numbers of others who don't know they
> are infected.
>
> The F.D.A. must naturally make sure that any proposed products
> are reliable and appropriate for use by untrained people.
Brilliant requirement.
> But once that's clear, the agency should swiftly
> certify a home-use test.
So what is tested? Is it spit, blood, urine, sperm? How does the woman
ask for
a sample 20 minutes before she kisses the guy and how does she feel safe
that the
test is correct else the false negative results could kill her
eventually through infection?