Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Longevity question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
miscellaneousmedia@yahoo.com - 16 Nov 2005 11:53 GMT
I keep reading that the new drugs keep people alive a very long time.
But is it indefinite? Too early to tell. Another 10 on top of the 10
one might get after infection? Variables?
GMCarter - 16 Nov 2005 12:14 GMT
>I keep reading that the new drugs keep people alive a very long time.
>But is it indefinite? Too early to tell. Another 10 on top of the 10
>one might get after infection? Variables?

Indefinite???? Of course not. LIFE is not indefinite.

LOTS of variables. Sensitivity to toxicities, adherence - how well
people can take all doses on time, response of virus to the drugs
(resistance), disease progression rates, nadir CD4 count....etc.

There is clearly a survival advantage to using ARV than to doing
nothing (as denialists here will suggest is just a marvelous idea).

Other variables might include the extent to which people take care of
their diet, exercise, stress reduction, use of a multivitamin....I've
known a fair number of folks who have lived 20+ years with HIV.

But it is a bit too early to say whether or not people can anticipate
a good chance at a normal life span. I'd say we're getting closer!

Except if you live in areas where ARV are not available, in large
measure due to the avarice of pharma that blocks access either
directly or thru lobbying for outrageous, genocidal unilateral trade
agreements that the United States is all too willing to foist upon
vulnerable nations in return for piddling concessions and such, the
letter and spirit of which the US often violates anyway, as they do
with ALL treaties the very moment they become inconvenient.

        George M. Carter
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.