I'm not sure how many people are aware of this but if you've been
exposed to HIV and go to a doctor or ER within 24 hours (the sooner
the better,) you can be given a short-term "cocktail" of anti-viral
drugs that will destroy any recent exposure of virus before it has a
chance to migrate to the lymthatic system where it is impossible to
cure the infection completely. Will you always be in a situation where
you can initiate treatment right away? Our kit contains enough
medication for 3 or 7 days, giving you enough time to start treatment
early, when treatment is most likely to result in a cure, and giving
you time to seek continued followup at a time and from a provider
convenient to you.
Ask any EMT (Emergency Medical Technician) or nurse what they do
when they get an accidental stick from a used hypodermic needle. The
first thing done, prophalactic treatment followed by screening the
potentially infectious source for HIV and hepatitis. If the source is
confirmed
positive or the results can not be made immediately available, the
stick victim is started on the full daily prophalactic regimen of
anti-viral medication.
These anti-virals are essentially the same drugs that are given to
patients with HIV disease to control the viral replication or load.
They are given as a three combo drug cocktail (abacavir sulfate, also
known as Ziagen, lamivudine, akso known as Epivir or 3TC and
zidovudine, also known as Retrovir, azidothymidine or ZDV.) These
drugs known as nucleoside analogues, effectively act as a prophylaxis
against allowing the virus to progress to an incurable infection. All
three of these drugs are offered in one tablet that is conveniently
taken as one tablet twice a day.
One might ask why the manufacturers of these pharmaceuticals are not
promoting and marketing their product as a prophalaxys? Many people
argue that pharmaceutical companies would be selling far fewer
pills by eliminating most future chronic cases of HIV disease. Keep in
mind, the FDA does not approve their use as a prophylactic remedy
before the issue, therefore most physicians are not likely to
prescribe small quantity of these drugs since prescription as a
preventative is
considered an "off-label" indication.
Please remember that having such a kit should not be used as a
subsitute for sound judgment and technique regarding the protection
against HIV, hepatitis, STDs or the prevention of pregancy. In other
words, any "morning-after" pill should be used as a "last resort"
remedy when all else fails. Anti-viral medications are powerful
drugs and side-effects are associated with the duration of treatment
schedule. It is believed that minimal or no side-effects have been
reported from these drugs when used as an occasional prophalaxys (30
days.) It is also important to mention that anti-viral drugs are not
100% unconditionally guaranteed by anyone to do anything. The only
guarantee made is that the drugs offered would be "brand-name"
authentic and fresh.
For a limited time the "morning after" HIV/AIDS kit is available today
at wholesale cost.
Confidential enquiries: wallace259@columbus.rr.com
Larry Wallace
Seamore Tush - 23 Dec 2005 18:20 GMT
LarryW wrote...
> I'm not sure how many people are aware of this but if you've been
> exposed to HIV and go to a doctor or ER within 24 hours (the sooner
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> stick victim is started on the full daily prophalactic regimen of
> anti-viral medication.
Maybe in the U.S., but not for long. Already in the UK the so-called
"experts" are pressing for a change in that policy on the grounds that
it is not "cost-effective" to give prophylactic treatment when the
risks are "so low." Naturally the "experts" have declined to jab
themselves with infected needles to re-assure the health care workers.
> These anti-virals are essentially the same drugs that are given to
> patients with HIV disease to control the viral replication or load.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> preventative is
> considered an "off-label" indication.
Oh, but they are promoting them as such. Not officially, but there is
a large black market in HIV drugs, the latest rage among the dizzy
disco slutpuppies is to buy a handful of assorted pills on the theory
that taking them just before or after unprotected sex prevents the
virus from taking hold. Like the Viagra available online without a
prescription, it is logical to assume the pharmaceutical companies are
funneling their HIV drugs through back channels, feigning the usual
ignorance about why they shipped 10 billion doses to a country with
a few million people.
> Please remember that having such a kit should not be used as a
> subsitute for sound judgment and technique regarding the protection
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Confidential enquiries: wallace259@columbus.rr.com
Hmm...
Susie, age 9 - 23 Dec 2005 19:18 GMT
> LarryW wrote...
>> I'm not sure how many people are aware of this but if you've been
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> chance to migrate to the lymthatic system where it is impossible to
>> cure the infection completely.
This is the stupidest thing you could do - supposing the virus has
entered your body, do you suppress your immune system?
I don't think so.
susie
Grinch - 25 Dec 2005 14:48 GMT
Susie, age 9 wrote...,
>>LarryW wrote...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I don't think so.
Actually it would seem logical. Since the virus infects immune system
cells, suppressing those cells would leave nothing for the virus to
infect. But of course if you completely eliminated the T-cells or
whatever it infects - even for a short time - you would likely die as
the billions of otherwise benign bacteria and viruses around you
invaded and multiplied in your body.
Still, the guy is selling snake oil. His poor spelling plus his
Roadrunner account suggests he is not legit, and even if he was selling
legitimate cocktail pills he would still be breaking the law by
selling them without a prescription. In the end readily-available
prophylactic treatment is bad because it provides a false sense of
security for the dizzy disco slutpuppies who think it either prevents
infection or cures it if taken early enough, and also that the virus
is now resistant to so many drugs that a particular emergency cocktail
isn't likely to work at all.
Susie, age 9 - 26 Dec 2005 19:03 GMT
> Susie, age 9 wrote...,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> cells, suppressing those cells would leave nothing for the virus to
> infect.
As if the "virus" comprehends your disturbed logic?
I don't think so.
> But of course if you completely eliminated the T-cells
Sorry, but immunosuppression does not eliminate T-cells.
LOL!
susie