 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / October 2005Aids in Africa
http://www.sickofdoctors.addr.com/articles/castro/castrosynopsis.htm Ok, You´re right. Read medical mafia from Ghislaine lanctot and you´ll see something like you say but related cancer. Keep in this way!! People need to know the true > http://www.sickofdoctors.addr.com/articles/castro/castrosynopsis.htm http://www.aegis.com/news/dmg/2002/MG020419.html quote>"One of the documents, entitled Castro Hlongwane, Caravans, Cats, Geese, Foot & Mouth and Statistics, was distributed to senior African National Congress structures in March and early April this year (2002) before howls of derision caused the embarrassed party leadership to withdraw it." Catch up will you. This document, which as you can see was hurridly withdrawn by the ANC because it was so mind-numbingly stupid, has faded into the black hole of denialist obscurity. There was evidence at the time that it was written on Mbeki's personal computer. The discovery that Mbeki may have authored the document (and entertained the thoughts expressed therin) was so awful to contemplate that a major cover-up ensued. But if you want to drag it up- fine.... Read about how Mbeki thinks the deaths of all his ANC pals from AIDS had nothing to do with HIV, but must have been due to something else...like...er...THE DRUGS! Would these be the same drugs that the ANC had been denying their own citizens the use of for years, while they were secretly swallowing them by the bucketful? >"Read about how Mbeki thinks the deaths of all his ANC pals from AIDS had nothing to do with HIV, but must have been due to something else... like... er...THE DRUGS! Would these be the same drugs that the ANC had been denying their own citizens the use of for years, while they were secretly swallowing them by the bucketful?" Oh come off it, Master David! Nobody (maybe except you) is so dense not to see that a depressed immune system can have more than one cause. Poor nutrition and being struck with endemic diseases such as malaria are know to do that. But THE DRUGS make a poor physical condition worse. A good reason not to use them at any time. What you want is to kill poor sick people off with toxic drugs. Could it be that your intentions are not entirely philanthropic? >>"Read about how Mbeki thinks the deaths of all his ANC pals from AIDS had >nothing to do with HIV, but must have been due to something else... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Oh come off it, Master David! Nobody (maybe except you) is so dense not >to see that a depressed immune system can have more than one cause. Bullshit again. SHOW THE EVIDENCE to support this claim that sustained and massive loss of CD4 counts will occur as seen in people with HIV. here ya go.... Daar ES, Moudgil T, Ho DD. Persistently low T-helper (CD4+) lymphocyte counts in HIV-negative asymptomatic men. Western Society of Clinical Investigation meeting, February 1990. This is not an area of interest so it remains unexplored in my opinion Yeah - Reports of low CD4 counts in HIV-uninfected persons are so vanishingly rare that they merit major articles in the New England Journal to specifically highlight why they are so unusual. http://171.66.123.143/cgi/content/full/328/6/386 [Extract: Persistently low CD4+ T-cell counts are highly unusual24,35. Transiently low counts have been noted in a number of cohort studies of HIV-negative persons: the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (Vermund S: personal communication), the CDC San Francisco Cohort Study (Holmberg S: personal communication), the Transfusion Safety Study,36 the New York City Intravenous Drug User Study (DesJarlais D: personal communication), and the New Jersey Intravenous Drug User Study37. Counts have also been reported as being low in several acute infections38,39 and in single cases of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis and disseminated histoplasmosis40,41.] Bottom line - if you have this condition, 99.9% of the time it is due to HIV. There are hundreds of thousands of people with HIV who have severe AIDS-defining conditions. Why do you think these conditions are so rare in those who are HIV-negative? > here ya go.... Daar ES, Moudgil T, Ho DD. Persistently low T-helper (CD4+) > asymptomatic men. Western Society of >Clinical Investigation meeting, February 1990. > > This is not an area of interest so it remains unexplored in my opinion An unsupported opinion. It is interesting to note that all of those scientists do not dispute or question the basic role of HIV in the development of AIDS. ICL, also, is extremely rare--and does NOT account for a lot of young men and women or kids having their CD4 count wiped out and suffering from CMV retinitis, CM, PCP, MAC, PML, etc. Here is another link: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00017329.htm These few handful of cases DO deserve more attention. No question. But they do not mean HIV doesn't cause AIDS. George M. Carter A fellow dissident sent me this link, with the comment: "How stupid can they get?" http://allafrica.com/stories/200509300603.html Pregnancy is one of the conditions that causes false positive HIV-tests, for catsake! So if your wife is pregnant, use a condom, so she will not get more pregnant... or get infected with More HIV... or whatever. Who wrote this trashy news item? A condom sales rep? >A fellow dissident sent me this link, with the comment: "How stupid can >they get?" [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Pregnancy is one of the conditions that causes false positive HIV-tests, >for catsake! The stupid people are the ones who assume the study is wrong without finding out numbers and doing arithmetic. According to AllAfrica, pregnancy results in a doubling of HIV incidence. According to the Lancet, incidence rates were: 2.3 per 100 person-years -- pregnant 1.3 per 100 person-years -- lactating 1.1 per 100 person-years -- not pregant or lactating (The Lancet article does not say whether these are ELISA positives or confirmed positives.) When 29.4 million Russians were tested in 1991, there were 30,000 false positive ELISA results. One quarter of the people tested were pregnant women. There were 8,000 false positives in pregnant women. 30,000/29.4 million = 1.02/1000. One quarter of 29.4 million is about 7.3 million. 8,000/7.3 million = 1.1/1000. This increase in false positives resulting from pregnancy is no where near a doubling -- it isn't even remotely capable of accounting for the pregnant women in the study having twice the incidence of other women.  SignatureDavid Canzi "I am not denying anything." -- Celia Farber |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.