Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

George M. Carter's "boogeymen" (as Carter pretends to have Hep-C)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AZT Murder - 06 Sep 2005 18:28 GMT
George M. Carter: A portrait of a Hep wannabe

Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.hepatitis
From: pan...@aol.com (Pandoc) - Find messages by this author  
Date: 1998/01/07

On Wed, 07 Jan 1998, g...@ix.netcom.com (George M. Carter) writes:

>pan...@aol.com (Pandoc) wrote:

>>Word on this guy Carter is busting out all over!

>>Here he is trying to pretend he has HCV!

>>Take notes, everyone, he is in passive aggressive
>>mode now.

>Hey! Cool! I love getting a definitive diagnosis from an
>anonymous poster!

In this session, we see more evidence of Carter's hypochondriasis.
Notice how he maintains an ambiguous Hepatitis C serostatus while
playing internet doctor to hepatitis sufferers. While this may not
seem important, and it probably does not to the average reader, it
does make for an interesting study in quackery.

One has to wonder why anyone without a college degree, such as
George M. Carter, would dispense unqualified medical advise to
people suffering from real medical conditions while he simultaneously
feigns their illnesses. The answer may lie in his own words: he has
exhibited a pathological desire to be loved, and to fit in, which he
feels is a fitting substitute for his past heroin addiction, or so he
claims. Or, the answer may be more mundane: he derives his living as a
"Treatment expert" under the cover of an AIDS buyer's club, again,
without possessing any academic credentials, selling nostrums to the
ignorant by pandering to their weaknesses, and later enlisting them as
shills for his crusade. Either way, a classic case of megalomania.

He has confirmed his HIV negative serostatus after much wrangling.
Maybe it's time that George "Liverboy" Carter seeks out western style
medical intervention in order to obtain a definitive diagnosis for his
assumed HCV malady.

>So now what are your sage views on DNCB? Your silence on the
>issue is the confession that you are a member of the DNCB-Now
>cryptofascist treatment crowd!

Here we see the cornered Carter trying to deflect attention away
from his failure as a boxwood evergreen (a failed HIV therapy that
was promoted by Carter after he received recompense from its
manufacturer) salesman by playing the treatment card; asking a
loaded, rhetorical question, then answering it with a hyperbolic,
passive-aggressive response.

>Ah, but we have Frod's Billi-reposts and his persistently repeated,
>persistently ignored ditherings about "what's killing San Francisco"
>to bore us all to an early grave.  

This vague reference to alleged Carter antagonists named
"Frod" and "Billi", that the casual reader will not understand,
appears to be an attempt by Carter to "suck in" subscribers in order
to make him appear to be a martyr. Notice how he drapes himself in
the phrase "us all" as he alludes to being murdered. It would be
amusing if his behavior was not so tragic.

>AIDS can't be half as deadly as misc.health.aids. But that's because
>of the fascist ravings of the Frod Show making any reasoned
>discussion impossible. Like his analysis of the science of his
>friends like Dogslobber. People found in disagreement are
>attacked by frod and all his pseudo-identities.

More references to death blamed on phantom "Nazis under the
bed" characters from Carter's fevered imagination (i.e., "Frod",
"Frod Show", "Dogslobber"). He blames his inability to
communicate in an open forum on "attacks" from these
"boogiemen", projecting his own schizophrenia and abusive nature
into the mix.

>But what the hell. This post will merely generate another from
>Frod with more inane ripostes and people with serious questions
>or discussion topics will not post here because of the way they'll
>get treated. So who is the real censor of misc.health.aids? The
>Frod Show.

>            George M. Carter

The usual pre-emptive tirade by Carter which insults all those who
have been mature enough to engage in meaningful discussions
here without wetting their pants or resorting to sophomoric tactics.
The "Frod Show" is his.

His attempts at moderation are rejected.

haveaniceday.

-- Zendoc

Charles P. McCarthy, P.M.D. (hon)
Clinical Specialist and Professor Emeritus
International School of Pantherapeuticological Medicine
Carmichael, CA USA

"Life is a membrane that reproduces 'Frods' for Carter."
                                             -Pandoc


GMCarter - 07 Sep 2005 00:02 GMT
>George M. Carter: A portrait of a Hep wannabe
>
>Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.hepatitis
>From: pan...@aol.com (Pandoc) -

Another Frodlet sock-puppet!

You know, Frod, this is bordering on a psychotic obsession.

I feel bad for you and still hope you find healing--but clearly,
that's very unlikely in this life.
AZT Murder - 07 Sep 2005 15:47 GMT
>>George M. Carter: A portrait of a Hep wannabe
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>You know, Frod, this is bordering on a psychotic obsession.

While Conman Carter's "boogeymen" now seem to be
encapsulated into this "Frod" character, I would agree
with Mr. McCarthy's post of 1998 that Mr. Carters
attempts at moderating this group are soundly rejected.

Of course, given the seven (7) years since this post
was published here, it is Conman's obsessions that
hint of a psychotic break long ago and thus bears
repeating in its entirety:

George M. Carter: A portrait of a Hep wannabe

Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.hepatitis
From: pan...@aol.com (Pandoc) - Find messages by this author  
Date: 1998/01/07

On Wed, 07 Jan 1998, g...@ix.netcom.com (George M. Carter) writes:

>pan...@aol.com (Pandoc) wrote:

>>Word on this guy Carter is busting out all over!

>>Here he is trying to pretend he has HCV!

>>Take notes, everyone, he is in passive aggressive
>>mode now.

>Hey! Cool! I love getting a definitive diagnosis from an
>anonymous poster!

In this session, we see more evidence of Carter's hypochondriasis.
Notice how he maintains an ambiguous Hepatitis C serostatus while
playing internet doctor to hepatitis sufferers. While this may not
seem important, and it probably does not to the average reader, it
does make for an interesting study in quackery.

One has to wonder why anyone without a college degree, such as
George M. Carter, would dispense unqualified medical advise to
people suffering from real medical conditions while he simultaneously
feigns their illnesses. The answer may lie in his own words: he has
exhibited a pathological desire to be loved, and to fit in, which he
feels is a fitting substitute for his past heroin addiction, or so he
claims. Or, the answer may be more mundane: he derives his living as a
"Treatment expert" under the cover of an AIDS buyer's club, again,
without possessing any academic credentials, selling nostrums to the
ignorant by pandering to their weaknesses, and later enlisting them as
shills for his crusade. Either way, a classic case of megalomania.

He has confirmed his HIV negative serostatus after much wrangling.
Maybe it's time that George "Liverboy" Carter seeks out western style
medical intervention in order to obtain a definitive diagnosis for his
assumed HCV malady.

>So now what are your sage views on DNCB? Your silence on the
>issue is the confession that you are a member of the DNCB-Now
>cryptofascist treatment crowd!

Here we see the cornered Carter trying to deflect attention away
from his failure as a boxwood evergreen (a failed HIV therapy that
was promoted by Carter after he received recompense from its
manufacturer) salesman by playing the treatment card; asking a
loaded, rhetorical question, then answering it with a hyperbolic,
passive-aggressive response.

>Ah, but we have Frod's Billi-reposts and his persistently repeated,
>persistently ignored ditherings about "what's killing San Francisco"
>to bore us all to an early grave.  

This vague reference to alleged Carter antagonists named
"Frod" and "Billi", that the casual reader will not understand,
appears to be an attempt by Carter to "suck in" subscribers in order
to make him appear to be a martyr. Notice how he drapes himself in
the phrase "us all" as he alludes to being murdered. It would be
amusing if his behavior was not so tragic.

>AIDS can't be half as deadly as misc.health.aids. But that's because
>of the fascist ravings of the Frod Show making any reasoned
>discussion impossible. Like his analysis of the science of his
>friends like Dogslobber. People found in disagreement are
>attacked by frod and all his pseudo-identities.

More references to death blamed on phantom "Nazis under the
bed" characters from Carter's fevered imagination (i.e., "Frod",
"Frod Show", "Dogslobber"). He blames his inability to
communicate in an open forum on "attacks" from these
"boogiemen", projecting his own schizophrenia and abusive nature
into the mix.

>But what the hell. This post will merely generate another from
>Frod with more inane ripostes and people with serious questions
>or discussion topics will not post here because of the way they'll
>get treated. So who is the real censor of misc.health.aids? The
>Frod Show.

>            George M. Carter

The usual pre-emptive tirade by Carter which insults all those who
have been mature enough to engage in meaningful discussions
here without wetting their pants or resorting to sophomoric tactics.
The "Frod Show" is his.

His attempts at moderation are rejected.

haveaniceday.

-- Zendoc

Charles P. McCarthy, P.M.D. (hon)
Clinical Specialist and Professor Emeritus
International School of Pantherapeuticological Medicine
Carmichael, CA USA

"Life is a membrane that reproduces 'Frods' for Carter."
                                             -Pandoc


GMCarter - 07 Sep 2005 16:28 GMT
>While Conman Carter's "boogeymen" now seem to be
>encapsulated into this "Frod" character, I would agree
>with Mr. McCarthy's post of 1998 that Mr. Carters
>attempts at moderating this group are soundly rejected.

LOL....who do you think you're kidding, Mr. Shaw?
Susie - 07 Sep 2005 17:20 GMT
>>While Conman Carter's "boogeymen" now seem to be
>>encapsulated into this "Frod" character, I would agree
>>with Mr. McCarthy's post of 1998 that Mr. Carters
>>attempts at moderating this group are soundly rejected.
>
> LOL....who do you think you're kidding, Mr. Shaw?

Everyone is laughing at you, Conman, including all those
boogeymen that you keep dragging out of your sordid
closet!

LOL

Susie
GMCarter - 07 Sep 2005 17:40 GMT
>Everyone is laughing at you, Conman, including all those
>boogeymen that you keep dragging out of your sordid
>closet!

And they say multiple personality disorder doesn't exist.
Susie - 07 Sep 2005 17:55 GMT
>>Everyone is laughing at you, Conman, including all those
>>boogeymen that you keep dragging out of your sordid
>>closet!
>
> And they say multiple personality disorder doesn't exist.

Hmmm .... "they say" ... it seems Conman Carter is haunted by
voices  -- that certainly explains his obsessions with boogeymen
as he fails in his struggle to moderate this and other newsgroups.

Susie
GMCarter - 07 Sep 2005 18:24 GMT
>Hmmm .... "they say" ...

yeah...that's the trouble frodlet. You have Susie in your head, and
AZT death and lord knows who else telling you all kinda things.....

Sweetie! It's so nice to have you back!

And you know, you have SUCH a talent for this type of stuff that no
sock puppet could ever not be imbued with your distinctive
personality!
Susie - 07 Sep 2005 20:19 GMT
>>Hmmm .... "they say" ...
>
> yeah...that's the trouble frodlet. You have Susie in your head
>
> Sweetie! It's so nice to have you back!

You are speaking in tongues, Conman.

Boogeymen/women seem to have that effect on you.

The reasons why are obvious.

Susie
Susie - 07 Sep 2005 17:30 GMT
>>While Conman Carter's "boogeymen" now seem to be
>>encapsulated into this "Frod" character, I would agree
>>with Mr. McCarthy's post of 1998 that Mr. Carters
>>attempts at moderating this group are soundly rejected.
>
> LOL....who do you think you're kidding, Mr. Shaw?

Frod, Fred, Frodlet, W. Fred, Pan, Charles McCarthy ...

Who do YOU think you're kidding, Mr. Paranoid?

LOL ... Susie
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.