By Joyce Howard Price
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
New cases of HIV, which causes AIDS, jumped sharply among homosexual men in the United
States from 1999 to 2002, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported
yesterday.
The number of new infections climbed 17 percent for homosexual men in this period, compared
with 7.3 percent for all men, the study revealed. It was published in the CDC's Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report.
"Reports of syphilis outbreaks and increased unprotected sex raise concerns regarding
increases in HIV transmission among men who have sex with men," the authors of the report said.
HIV is the acronym for human immunodeficiency virus.
In a telephone interview yesterday, Dr. Rob Janssen, director of the CDC's AIDS division,
said black men continue to account for more than half (55 percent) of new HIV diagnoses in the
country, making them the hardest-hit population.
HIV cases increased 26 percent and 8 percent, respectively, among Hispanic men and
non-Hispanic white men during the survey period.
In all racial categories, the greatest number of men being diagnosed with HIV were
homosexual or bisexual, Dr. Janssen said. Researchers say their data were based on 102,590 new
HIV diagnoses in 29 states in the survey period. Of those, 43,144 were among homosexual and
bisexual men. The other infections, including heterosexual men, were mostly transmitted through
intravenous drug use. The rates of infection for both the groups remained steady during the
period.
Growing numbers of homosexual men appear to be ignoring "safe sex" warnings and putting
themselves at risk for HIV and sexually transmitted diseases. One reason, Dr. Janssen said, is
the erroneous belief that AIDS is "curable." The other is that HIV/AIDS is viewed as a chronic,
not terminal, disorder, which can be managed with a variety of drug cocktails.
However, he said, not everyone will respond to HIV/AIDS treatments, and prevention is the
best course. Exacerbating the problem, he said, is the failure of many people to know their HIV
status. "We estimate that some 250,000 of the 900,000 Americans believed to be positive for HIV
do not know they are infected."
CDC researchers say their analysis did not include some states having the highest
prevalence of exposure to HIV or infection with other sexually transmitted diseases through
homosexual or bisexual contact. Such jurisdictions include New York, California, Illinois and
the District. The omissions - owing to the recent switch from counting only full-blown AIDS
cases to including HIV cases - make the findings even more worrisome, investigators say.
The HIV findings follow the release of other data in recent days from the CDC and the
National Center for Health Statistics, which showed that the rate of primary and secondary
syphilis increased 9.1 percent last year.
The rise in syphilis cases last year is the second consecutive annual increase. The CDC
attributed the rise to more syphilis cases among men, especially homosexual and bisexual men.
The HIV surveillance data from the 29 states support 25-state results released in July at
the National HIV/STD Conference in Atlanta.
In July, the CDC reported that AIDS-related deaths fell 5.9 percent last year, but overall
AIDS diagnoses rose 2.2 percent. The earlier results showed that HIV cases among men having
sexual relations with men rose 7.1 percent from 2001 to 2002.
"These findings add to the growing concern that we are facing a potential resurgence of HIV
among gay and bisexual men," Dr. Harold Jaffe, director of the CDC's National Center for HIV,
STD and TB Prevention, said at the conference in Atlanta.
Dr. Janssen said the study "reinforces the concerns" raised by Dr. Jaffe, who has
researched AIDS at the CDC since the center began tracking the disease.
Initially, AIDS primarily was a disease affecting homosexual men. Their share of the
epidemic began to wane by the early to mid-1990s, as many homosexual men turned away from
unsafe sexual practices.
Gary Stein - 09 Aug 2005 23:59 GMT
Your point would be?
Also being that this data only comes from the 29 states with CDC approved
HIV reporting and understanding that for the first decade of the HIV
epidemic HIV was not reported at all. How does anyone know if the 17%
increase has any historical meaning what so ever. The biggest signal failure
of the CDC and the NIH is that they have in 20 plus years done almost no
research on the scale and scope of the HIV epidemic in this country.
No one knows how many HIV positive Americans there are, no one knows the
demographics of the HIV epidemic in this country. No one knows the
geographical differences of HIV in the US etc etc. It is little wonder that
the prevention efforts are not as effective as one would hope. None of the
organizations tasked with implementing prevention plans have the data they
need to really address the issue in effective ways.
Gary Stein
> By Joyce Howard Price
> THE WASHINGTON TIMES
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
> turned away from
> unsafe sexual practices.
Death - 10 Aug 2005 00:55 GMT
"Gary Stein" <ge.stein@verizon.net> wrote in message
> Also being that this data only comes from the 29 states with CDC approved
> HIV reporting .......
That is true. That would mean the number of msm with hiv/aids
will be a larger number than is reported/reportable.
You need not track something 20 years to notice an increase
or a decrease.
The article gave specific dates, 1999-2002.
From one year to the other there was a 17% increase.
David Canzi -- non-mailable - 10 Aug 2005 00:51 GMT
You're doing a good job of concealing your accent. When you're
speaking less carefully, you tend to say "nasssty faggotses..."

Signature
David Canzi "I am not denying anything." -- Celia Farber
Death - 10 Aug 2005 02:52 GMT
"David Canzi <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca> wrote in message
> You're doing a good job of concealing your accent. When you're
> speaking less carefully, you tend to say "nasssty faggotses..."
You are paying attention, excellent.
Now that you are, let me pose a question.
Which is worse?
Someone spreading filthy diseases
or
someone saying, someone is spreading filthy diseases.
A reply is not required, just call it, food for thought.