 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / July 2005Tattoo proposal...
I already anticipate the comparison to Nazi concentration camp tattoos, but this variation was suggested by a black female newspaper columnist. She suggested that people with HIV be required to receive a very small yet visible and distinctive tattoo on their genitals. The only people who would likely ever see the tattoo are potential sexual partners as they undressed in preparation for sex. The infected could mingle in society with no one the wiser as to their HIV+ status, there would be no stigma (as opposed to my proposal to brand "HIV" on their foreheads), and only those who were about to engage in sex with them would ever see it. And that shouldn't be a problem, because the infected ALWAYS verbally inform their potential partners of their HIV+ status, so seeing the tattoo after being informed would be no surprise at all. I'm expecting the Nazi Death Camp comparison as it will be rather hard for the activists to find a flaw with this proposal. Unable to argue against genital tattoos being helpful when an HIV+ individual "forgets" to inform his partner, they invoke Godwin's Law by comparing the idea to Nazis in order to discredit it. Hmm... Ever heard of laser tattoo removal? Or tattoo something else over whatever symbol for being positive? If people want to be dishonest there's always a way will you bite the hand that feeds you...will you stay down on your knees wrote: > I already anticipate the comparison to Nazi concentration camp tattoos, but > this variation was suggested by a black female newspaper columnist. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > to inform his partner, they invoke Godwin's Law by comparing the idea > to Nazis in order to discredit it. <news4read@yahoo.com> wrote... > Hmm... Ever heard of laser tattoo removal? Or tattoo something else > over whatever symbol for being positive? If people want to be dishonest > there's always a way And removing it could be a crime, plus at every visit to the AIDS clinic for their drug refills they could be examined to make sure the tattoo was still there. And of course if they don't like the idea we can always return to the idea of quarantine camps, the tattoo proposal was simply a more reasonable alternative. > <news4read@yahoo.com> wrote... >> Hmm... Ever heard of laser tattoo removal? Or tattoo something else [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > return to the idea of quarantine camps, the tattoo proposal was simply > a more reasonable alternative. I wonder where they were thinking of placing the tattoo on woman? <RamRod Sword of Baal> wrote in message > I wonder where they were thinking of placing the tattoo on woman? NOT the face. By the time I get that high, I either have a hard on or have decided to pass anyway. RamRodSwordofBaal wrote: > > <news4read@yahoo.com> wrote... > >> Hmm... Ever heard of laser tattoo removal? Or tattoo something else [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > I wonder where they were thinking of placing the tattoo on woman? In your case, turd burglar, the tattoo will also be on your arse cheeks. > <news4read@yahoo.com> wrote... > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > return to the idea of quarantine camps, the tattoo proposal was simply > a more reasonable alternative. I like the quarantine camp idea but since much of the worlds politicians are nothing more than feckless little pussies we would never have any kind of a quarantine camp for hiv faggots or hiv *anyone* for that matter.  Signature"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland >> <news4read@yahoo.com> wrote... >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > are nothing more than feckless little pussies we would never have any > kind of a quarantine camp for hiv faggots or hiv *anyone* for that matter. So are you a politician as well since you are definitely a feckless little pussy? Signature"What is true of every member of the society, individually, is true of them all collectively; since the rights of the whole can be no more than the sum of the rights of the individuals." --Thomas Jefferson will you bite the hand that feeds you...will you stay down on your knees wrote: > I already anticipate the comparison to Nazi concentration camp tattoos, but > this variation was suggested by a black female newspaper columnist. > > She suggested that people with HIV be required to receive a very small yet > visible and distinctive tattoo on their genitals. Unless it's a glow in the dark tatto, the idea is worthless. FAr better to brand the foreheads of HIV positives. Put the mark where it can be seen by everybody, and burn the brand in to the bone of their skull. The only people who > would likely ever see the tattoo are potential sexual partners as they > undressed in preparation for sex. The infected could mingle in society [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > their potential partners of their HIV+ status, so seeing the tattoo > after being informed would be no surprise at all. How would this black soq know, unless she is confessing to f.cking multiple diseae infested nigger bucks? > I'm expecting the Nazi Death Camp comparison as it will be rather hard > for the activists to find a flaw with this proposal. Better to export all diseased queers and niggers to an isolated island, just like was done with lepers. Leave them to fight and f.ck their way untill they die.
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.