Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

bye-sexual

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Death - 07 Jul 2005 16:47 GMT
NEWS.com.auFOX
July 07, 2005

MALE bisexuality does not exist, psychologists in the US have claimed.

A new study concludes that the large majority of men purporting to be bisexual are actually
gay, while the rest are more likely to be heterosexual.
Senior author Michael Bailey, from Northwestern University in Chicago, said: "Bisexual male
behaviour certainly exists, but the study suggests that a bisexual orientation, an actual
sexual preference for both men and women, does not exist in men. If such men exist, they are
certainly very rare and we didn't find them."

Researchers recruited 101 young adult men, 33 identifying themselves as bisexual, 30 straight
and 38 homosexual.

They were questioned at length about their sexuality before being seated alone in a laboratory
to watch erotic films while their arousal levels were monitored by a sensor.

Gay men were aroused by images of men, while heterosexual men were aroused by women. But
psychologists said those claiming to be bisexual were only aroused by one or the other - 75per
cent by men and the rest by women.

Dr Bailey said some men claim to be bisexual as it is easier than admitting to being gay, while
others might consider it some kind of achievement and be proud to swing both ways.
Brian Mailman - 07 Jul 2005 18:16 GMT
>  NEWS.com.auFOX

ah.  that explains it.  Fox folk have never heard the word "Kinsey."

B/
Death - 10 Jul 2005 15:08 GMT
> >  NEWS.com.auFOX
>
> ah.  that explains it.  Fox folk have never heard the word "Kinsey."

Why would anyone be interested in the opinion of Kinsey?
chronic hydroponic - 14 Jul 2005 01:52 GMT
"Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote...

>>  NEWS.com.auFOX
>
> ah.  that explains it.  Fox folk have never heard the word "Kinsey."

And you dare to cite Kinsey now that he has been thoroughly
discredited for at least a decade?  I hate Fox, it is nothing
but rightard pro-Bush propaganda, but you can discredit them
by citing a discredited study conducted half a century ago.

I'm inclined to agree, that straight men are horny enough to
f.ck other men and that gay men might somehow see themselves
as "less gay" if they can convince themselves to engage in
sex with a woman.  I like the idea of conducting a study
using an erection meter, just like I saw on an episode of the
raunchy "Man Show" a year or two ago.  A guy can CLAIM any
sexual preference at all, but what does the woody meter
register when he is shown pictures of hot men and women?
Are you saying that such a meter is less accurate than Kinsey's
politically-biased interviews conducted half a century ago?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.