Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Other useless tests

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
PaulKing - 27 May 2005 06:51 GMT
Models of STD transmission

Condoms are made to withstand the rigors of sex. But the models used by
governments to test condom durability have nothing to do with sex.

Even if the models used to test condoms are reasonable indicators of
whether a condom will break during sex, and thus whether they will
function adequately in preventing sperm from reaching the female's
reproductive system, but they may be rather poor indicators of whether a
microscopic pathogen can pass from one partner to the other.

For example, the water test can detect holes only as small as 5 mm, but
this sized hole is many times the size of sexually-transmitted viruses and
even of the bacterium Chylamidia.

Similarly, the airburst test is insensitive to small holes. So here we
find new limitations of existing methods of testing condoms: these models
don't give us a good understanding of the barrier to pathogens afforded by
a condom.

That is, these models have serious limitations when considering condoms as
barriers to infectious disease.

http://www.utexas.edu/courses/bio301d/Topics/Condoms/Text.html
GMCarter - 27 May 2005 09:47 GMT
>http://www.utexas.edu/courses/bio301d/Topics/Condoms/Text.html

Again a lie--implying a position of U Texas which it is NOT. It is the
view of a student of sophistry.

        George M. Carter
Brian Mailman - 27 May 2005 17:23 GMT
>>http://www.utexas.edu/courses/bio301d/Topics/Condoms/Text.html
>
> Again a lie--implying a position of U Texas which it is NOT. It is the
> view of a student of sophistry.

i thought 'soph' was the late great tucker.... as in 'and then my
boyfriend ernie said 'soph1''....

b/
PaulKing - 27 May 2005 21:42 GMT
Carter lied again. What's new?

http://www.utexas.edu/courses/bio301d/Topics/Condoms/Text.html

"Chapter 6. Models of sex in condom testing
"
PaulKing - 27 May 2005 21:42 GMT
NONSENSE. It is the course paper NOT a student view.

"Chapter 6. Models of sex in condom testing"
http://www.utexas.edu/courses/bio301d/Topics/Condoms/Text.html

LIER, LIER, LIER
PaulKing - 27 May 2005 22:27 GMT
I urge EVERYONE to check for themselves.

What a blatent lier Carter really is.

Never ever believe a single word this pathetic lier says.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.