EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Toluene is a colorless liquid that is widely used as raw material in the
production of organic
compounds and as a solvent (U.S. EPA, 1990). It is readily absorbed from
the gastrointestinal and
respiratory tracts, and to a lesser degree through the skin. Toluene is
distributed throughout the body, with
accumulation in tissues with high lipid content. It is metabolized in the
liver, primarily to hippuric acid and
benzoyl glucuronide, compounds that are rapidly excreted in the urine
(U.S. EPA, 1990; ATSDR, 1989).
In humans and animals, the primary effect associated with inhalation
exposure to toluene is central
nervous system (CNS) depression. Short-term exposure of humans to 100-1500
ppm has elicited CNS
effects such as fatigue, confusion, incoordination, and impairments in
reaction time, perception, and motor
control and function (NTP, 1990). Exposure to concentrations ranging from
10,000 to 30,000 ppm has
resulted in narcosis and deaths (WHO, 1985). Prolonged abuse of toluene or
solvent mixtures containing
toluene has led to permanent CNS effects. Exposure to high concentrations
of toluene (1500 ppm) has
produced hearing loss in rats (Pryor et al., 1984). Hepatomegaly and
impaired liver and kidney function
have been reported in some humans chronically exposed to toluene
(Askergren, 1984; Szilard et al., 1978;
Greenburg et al., 1942). Toluene vapors may cause eye irritation (Andersen
et al., 1983) and prolonged
or repeated dermal contact may produce drying of skin and dermatitis
(ATSDR, 1989; NIOSH, 1973).
In experimental animals, subchronic inhalation exposure to $2500 ppm
toluene resulted in increased
liver and kidney weights (rats and mice), increased heart weights (rats),
increased lung weights, and
centrilobular hypertrophy of the liver (mice) (NTP, 1990). Chronic
inhalation exposure to 600 or 1200
ppm for 2 years produced degeneration of olfactory and respiratory
epithelia of rats and minimal
hyperplasia of bronchial epithelia in mice (NTP, 1990).
Subchronic oral administration of toluene at doses ranging from 312 to
5000 mg/kg/day produced clinical
signs of neurotoxicity at $2500 mg/kg in rats and mice. Other effects in
rats observed at the higher doses
included increased relative liver, kidney, and heart weights (females
only), and necrosis of the brain and
hemorrhage of the urinary bladder (NTP, 1990).
There is equivocal evidence that exposure to toluene in utero causes an
increased risk of CNS
abnormalities and developmental delay in humans (Goodwin, 1988; Hersh et
al., 1985; Holmberg, 1979).
Animal studies, in which toluene was administered by inhalation, showed
that toluene exposure results in
fetotoxicity and delayed skeletal development but does not cause internal
or external malformations in rats
(Courtney et al., 1986; Litton Bionetics, 1978). An oral study noted an
increased incidence of embryonic
deaths, cleft palate, and maternal toxicity in mice administered 1 mL/kg
toluene during gestation (Nawrot
and Staples, 1979).
An oral reference dose (RfD) of 2 mg/kg/day for subchronic exposure (U.S.
EPA, 1993) and 0.2
mg/kg/day for chronic exposure (U.S. EPA, 1992) to toluene was calculated
based on a no-observedadverse-
effect level (NOAEL) of 223 mg/kg/day and a lowest-observed-adverse-effect
level (LOAEL)
of 446 mg/kg/day from a 13-week subchronic gavage study in rats (NTP,
1990). Increased liver and
kidney weights in males were identified as the critical effects. A
subchronic (U.S. EPA, 1993) and
chronic inhalation reference concentration (RfC) of 0.4 mg/m3 (U.S. EPA
1992) was calculated based on
results of a battery of neurological tests with occupationally exposed
female subjects (Foo et al., 1990).
An increased incidence of hemolymphoreticular neoplasms was reported in
rats exposed to 500
mg/kg of toluene by gavage for 2 years (Maltoni et al., 1985); however,
results from two long-term
inhalation studies (NTP, 1990; Gibson and Hardisty, 1983) indicate that
toluene is not carcinogenic at
concentrations up to 1200 ppm. Based on U.S. EPA guidelines, toluene was
assigned to weight-ofevidence
group D, not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity (U.S. EPA, 1992).
1. INTRODUCTION
Toluene (C6H5CH3; CAS No. 108-88-3), also known as methylbenzene and
phenylmethane, is a
colorless liquid with a sweet pungent odor (HSDB, 1992). It has a
molecular weight of 92.15, a density of
0.8669 g/mL at 20°C, and an octanol/water partition coefficient of 2.79
(Lide, 1991; Mabey et al., 1982).
Toluene is isolated by distillation of reformed or pyrolized petroleum and
coal tar; however, most of the
toluene produced remains as a benzene-toluene-xylene (BTX) mixture for use
in gasoline. The primary
use of isolated toluene is in the production of benzene and for
backblending into gasoline to increase
octane ratings (U.S. EPA, 1990). Toluene is also used as raw material in
the production of benzyl
chloride, benzoic acid, phenol, cresols, vinyl toluene, TNT, and toluene
diisocyanate (U.S. Air Force,
1989), and as a solvent for paints and coatings, and in adhesives, inks,
and pharmaceuticals (U.S. EPA,
1990).
Inhalation is the primary route of exposure to toluene for the general
population and for
occupationally exposed individuals. Evaporation of gasoline and automobile
exhaust is the largest source
of toluene in the environment, and industries that use toluene as a
solvent are the second largest source
(U.S. EPA, 1984). Toluene is also a common indoor contaminant due to
releases from common
household products and from cigarette smoke (ATSDR, 1989). Non-atmospheric
releases of toluene are
relatively small (e.g., to water and soil) and are estimated to comprise
less than 1% of total toluene
releases (ATSDR, 1989). In the atmosphere, toluene is degraded by reaction
with hydroxyl radicals, with
a typical half-life of about 13 hours. It is highly volatile and
volatilization is likely to be the predominant
removal process from soil and water. Toluene is also subject to microbial
degradation. Because of
volatilization and biodegradation, toluene levels in the environment are
not expected to increase over time
(U.S. EPA, 1990; ATSDR, 1989).
2. METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
2.1. ABSORPTION
Toluene is readily absorbed from the respiratory and gastrointestinal
tracts, and to a lesser extent
through the skin. Animal studies suggest that absorption from the
gastrointestinal tract is complete.
Absorption data for humans and animals indicate that pulmonary absorption
is 85-90% during brief
exposures, but nearer to 50% during extended exposures (<1 hour). In
humans, toluene has been
detected in the arterial blood within 10 seconds after initiation of
inhalation exposures. Cutaneous
absorption is approximately 1% of that absorbed by the lungs when there is
exposure to the vapor;
however, dermal absorption of the liquid may be higher. Because toluene
evaporates readily, it is unlikely
that significant absorption will occur by this route. Exercise greatly
increases the absorption of toluene
(U.S. EPA, 1990).
2.2. DISTRIBUTION
Distribution of toluene following absorption occurs throughout the body,
with accumulation in
adipose tissue, other tissues with high fat content, and highly vascular
tissues. High levels of toluene were
found in the brain and liver of an individual who had died following an
episode of glue sniffing (Paterson
and Sarvesvaran, 1983). Autoradiography studies using mice indicate that
immediately after inhalation
exposure, a high level of radioactivity is present in the body fat, bone
marrow, spinal nerves, spinal cord,
and white matter of the brain. Radioactivity was also observed in the
blood, kidney, and liver, but at lower
levels (Bergman, 1979). In one individual who died 30 minutes after
ingestion of toluene, the liver had the
highest concentration of toluene, followed by the pancreas, brain, heart,
blood, body fat, and cerebrospinal
fluid (Ameno et al., 1989). Since retention time of toluene is usually
considered to be less than 24 hours,
bioaccumulation of toluene is unlikely (U.S. EPA, 1990).
http://riskassessment.ornl.gov/documents/TOLUENE.pdf
David Canzi -- non-mailable - 20 May 2005 18:11 GMT
Copious information about the harmful effects of toluene at
various levels of exposure, but no information about how much
toluene exposure, if any, results from using condoms.

Signature
David Canzi
PaulKing - 20 May 2005 19:26 GMT
A great deal. As i said above, it is generally ONLY available in 56 gal
drumbs and large condom manufacturers buy thousands and thousands.
The levels are FAR in excess of the quantities considered a risk as
outlined in the above article.
PaulKing - 20 May 2005 22:22 GMT
With adverse effects starting at as low as 100 PPM or a 1 in 10,000 ratio
of Toluene to latex it leaves NO DOUBT that far greater amount of the
substance can be found in any condom.
I never took accurate measurements (when working with prevulc) but would
guess from memory that the level of Toluene is in the 5,000 to 10,000 PPM
range.
I cannot state this a correct but doubt it is an over estimate.
David Canzi -- non-mailable - 21 May 2005 05:32 GMT
>With adverse effects starting at as low as 100 PPM or a 1 in 10,000 ratio
>of Toluene to latex
That was 100 PPM in air, not latex.
>it leaves NO DOUBT that far greater amount of the
>substance can be found in any condom.
I still doubt, because you can't provide any information about toluene
in condoms from *credible* sources.
>I never took accurate measurements (when working with prevulc) but would
>guess from memory
That is not a credible source.
>that the level of Toluene is in the 5,000 to 10,000 PPM
>range.
Even if this is true of the goop in the dipping tank, it tells us
nothing about how much toluene remains in the final product when it
reaches a consumer's hands.

Signature
David Canzi
PaulKing - 21 May 2005 08:37 GMT
"nothing about how much toluene remains in the final product when it
reaches a consumer's hands."
Latex is a great binder and little escapes it.
David Canzi -- non-mailable - 21 May 2005 22:23 GMT
>"nothing about how much toluene remains in the final product when it
>reaches a consumer's hands."
>
>Latex is a great binder and little escapes it.
If toluene doesn't escape from latex, condom users won't be exposed
to it.

Signature
David Canzi
David Canzi -- non-mailable - 21 May 2005 04:57 GMT
>A great deal. As i said above, it is generally ONLY available in 56 gal
>drumbs and large condom manufacturers buy thousands and thousands.
Lame, Mark, really lame.
You don't say and probably don't know: (1) Whether they're using
thousands of drums per month, thousands per year, thousands per decade.
(2) How much of that is used for products other than condoms. (3) How
much is used *per* *condom* produced. (4) How much of that evaporates
out of the condom between the dippings and before the condom is rolled.
Condoms are thin, toluene is volatile, and time must be allowed for
the liquid latex to harden between production steps.
So, this "thousands and thousands" factoid that you pulled from some
unrevealed location, even if true, is almost completely irrelevant
to the question asked: How much toluene exposure results from using
condoms?
And now for the obligatory, no-post-complete-without-one, unsupported
assertion:
>The levels are FAR in excess of the quantities considered a risk as
>outlined in the above article.

Signature
David Canzi
PaulKing - 21 May 2005 08:40 GMT
Little escapes latex. Remember it is used to seal jars and hypo's.
You can riggle as much as you like but it is quite clear that condoms
contain VERY high levels of this proven teratogen.
Anything over a few hundred PPM is a real danger.
David Canzi -- non-mailable - 21 May 2005 22:27 GMT
>You can riggle as much as you like but it is quite clear that condoms
>contain VERY high levels of this proven teratogen.
Q. If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?
A. Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one.
Saying something is clear doesn't make it clear.

Signature
David Canzi
PaulKing - 22 May 2005 01:29 GMT
Saying something is clear doesn't make it clear.....but proving it with
hard facts does.
David Canzi -- non-mailable - 22 May 2005 18:47 GMT
>Saying something is clear doesn't make it clear.....but proving it with
>hard facts does.
Tell us the date and time of the article in which you provided a
credible source for the amount of toluene condom users are exposed to.
The only hard (or rather, hardened) fact you've demonstrated in this
thread is the ossification of your neural tissues.

Signature
David Canzi
PaulKing - 21 May 2005 08:41 GMT
Smoking a pack of cigarettes a day is equivalent to an exposure level of
1,000 micrograms of toluene.
This is enough according to the FDA to cause birth defects.
Condoms contain hundreds of times more toluene then this.
What recommendations has the federal government made to protect human
health?
The federal government has developed regulatory standards and guidelines
to protect you from the possible health effects of toluene in the
environment. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has
set a limit of 100 ppm of toluene for air in the workplace, averaged for
an 8-hour exposure per day over a 40-hour work week. The American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) and the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) have recommended
that
toluene in workplace air not exceed 100 ppm (as an average level over 8
hours).
Condom manufacturers add toluene to per vulc. latex to aid mixing during
ball milling. The quantities used are substantial (like adding paint
thinner to your paint) and VASTLY in excess of the 100 parts per million
(one part per 10,000 of latex) considered the maximum safe level.
Condoms clearly cause birth defects. If not then what we have been told
about cigarettes causing birth defects is quite impossible.
Gary Stein - 21 May 2005 18:51 GMT
> Smoking a pack of cigarettes a day is equivalent to an exposure level of
> 1,000 micrograms of toluene.
>
> This is enough according to the FDA to cause birth defects.
So were are the millions of birth defects that would have occurred in
mothers who smoked over the last 80 years? During the 1930's to 1980's
smoking was much more frequent in expectant mothers then it has been since
mothers where told to quit smoking if they were pregnant. Yet I don't see
any evidence of huge birth defect rates among those women who smoked.
Yes they did have slightly higher rates of birth defects then non-smokers
that is why the FDA issued it's advisory on smoking and pregnancy but not
near the rate one would see if your statements are to be taken at face
value.
Gary Stein