 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / May 2005Not quite the right group for this
Yeah I paid some dirty hooker to give me a blow job and long story short she didnt finish (i didnt ejalculate) and im wondering how likely it is I attracted some disease and should i go to a clinic (yes i guess but how urgently) Almost zero risk with a BJ. Don't worry about it for a second. Choose Hookers that finish what they start in future. "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote... > Almost zero risk with a BJ. > > Don't worry about it for a second. > > Choose Hookers that finish what they start in future. I would concede that the risk SEEMS low, but AFAIK no one has ever bothered to actually calculate the risk of transmission for any particular sexual act (or if they have it is being suppressed for reasons of political correctness). The risk is NOT 0.00% as the AIDS advocates would have you believe, but I can't say what the actual risk would be. It is generally believed that semen is the primary carrier of the HIV virus and it seems to explain why almost all cases occur among men who have had receptive anal or oral sex with an infected man, or among women who have receptive vaginal, anal, or oral sex with an infected man, but VERY rarely among men who have any type of sex with an infected woman or women who have any type of sex with other women (but I did read of a case where it was transmitted through lesbian sex). More likely is that the writer contracted something like herpes, genital warts, gonnorhea (sp?), syphillis, or some other nasty disease, but none of those will kill him and if he did catch HIV then it doesn't matter whether he goes to the clinic or not, he's already dead. Rare - So rare there is only ONE suspected case in the entire World and that was never confirmed. Maybe not 0.000000000% (if you believe in 'AIDS') but clearly 0.0000000001% at most. SEX IS VERY, VERY SAFE DISPITE ALL THE PURITAN HYPE. I said "not quite the right group for this" because im not really concerned about aids, but other diseases. I guess what im asking is how dangerous a non-ejalculate BJ is overall I said "not quite the right group for this" because im not really concerned about aids, but other diseases. I guess what im asking is how dangerous a non-ejalculate BJ is overall (from a dirty hooker) Are you going to believe your next sex partner telling you they only did one sexual practice and then just stopped there? Very often people do not just do one sexual practice and stop. One of the myths of ranking risks for sexual practices is a notion that sexual practices can be isolated for risk. It is a myth because very often people do not just do one sexual practice and stop there. Then there is that the heart beats faster, the mind goes numb, people do not acurately recall what actually happened at every moment during sex. Your next sexual partner's recollection of their sexual history cannot be accurate always. Now think about the reverse, what might your next sexual partner be concerned about regarding your sexual history !? "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote... > Rare - So rare there is only ONE suspected case in the entire World and > that was never confirmed. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > SEX IS VERY, VERY SAFE DISPITE ALL THE PURITAN HYPE. No, it's not safe, and my stupid brother found that out the hard way. And amazingly, just after I wrote the earlier reply I went to work and my Mexican-American coworker asked me if I knew of a doctor on the Mexican side because he had recently f.cked a girl who gave him something (probably gonnorhea because he said his dick burned). Most Mexicans have no problem with condoms, but some do goosestep to the catholic church's party line that all forms of birth control are a sin, but naturally ignore the prohibition on pre-marital sex (it's always amazing how comfortable xians of any sect feel about picking and choosing those parts of the bible and church dogma to obey). Go get tested for sexually transmitted infections today rather than tomorrow. Detecting any infection earlier than later would make it easier to treat. The sexually transmitted infections are epidemic to such an extent that there are free clinics that will test everybody listed on your state or provincial government website under Public Health clinics, for example http://www.doh.wa.gov/ http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ Look at from the point of view of your next sexual partner. Or look at it considering that your next sexual partner could have had similar kinds of sexual experiences. Would you have sex with somebody you just met who told you they have an infection and that if you got it you could die? Consider that for most people sexual behavior is consistant. That somebody who had one kind of experience has probably had previous experiences that would raise similar questions. At a collaborative blog about the strategy of getting tested together before having sex scroll down toward the bottom for more details on this page http://NotB4WeKnow.EditThisPage.com |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.