Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

THE FDA SAYS ONLY 1% OF LATEX DEATHS ARE REPORTED

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
PaulKing - 20 Apr 2005 10:21 GMT
THE FDA SAYS ONLY 1% OF LATEX DEATHS ARE REPORTED

Delayed contact dermatitis from chemicals in rubber has been recognized
since the 1930s.4 But except for rare early reports, clinicians did not
appreciate systemic allergic reactions to latex proteins until 1979, when
case reports began to appear in Europe. 5

Latex allergy erupted in the United States shortly after the Centers for
Disease Control introduced universal precautions in 1987. By late 1992,
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received 1133 reports of serious
allergic reactions and anaphylaxis occurring to patients and health care
staff associated with 30 classes of latex medical devices. There were 15
patient deaths associated with latex barium enema catheters.5,6

The FDA estimated that the reports represented only 1% of actual
occurrences.6

Today, researchers hypothesize that the latex allergy outbreak is the
result of multiple factors including deficiencies in manufacturing
processes, increased latex exposure, hand care practices, immunological
cross reactivity, and changes in latex agricultural practices.1,7,8, 45

Latex allergy affects between 8%-12% of workers in all health disciplines.
Latex allergy also affects up to 51% of children with spina bifida, and
approximately 1% of the general population.

http://www.nursingworld.org/readroom/position/workplac/wklatex.htm
GMCarter - 20 Apr 2005 12:15 GMT
>THE FDA SAYS ONLY 1% OF LATEX DEATHS ARE REPORTED

None of them related to condom use.
PaulKing - 20 Apr 2005 21:39 GMT
Oh really.

So they don't report to the FDA but they do report to the great GM Carter?
GMCarter - 21 Apr 2005 00:47 GMT
>Oh really.
>
>So they don't report to the FDA but they do report to the great GM Carter?

There's no evidence that condoms ever caused a death. Ever.
PaulKing - 21 Apr 2005 02:47 GMT
..just the fact they are EXACTLY the same formulation as latex gloves,
contain carcinigens, teratogens and over a 100 FDA listed toxins.

As almost no latex deaths are reported (1% according to the FDA) this is
hardly surprising.

Cancer and even latex allergy takes years to develop and so without any
focus on condoms there role can easily be ignored.

If gloves cause so many to suffer and die than clearly so do condoms.

Nothing could be more obvious.
GMCarter - 21 Apr 2005 10:22 GMT
>..just the fact they are EXACTLY the same formulation as latex gloves,
>contain carcinigens, teratogens and over a 100 FDA listed toxins.

So you claim. So you fail to understand the surface area and frequency
of use issues. So you fail to understand the relative and absolute
risks of latex allergy developing under such vastly different
scenarios. So you fail to comprehend the difference between a risk of
latex allergy versus the risks associated with HIV and sexually
transmitted infections.

So are you making lots of money filming people f.cking bareback based
on your self delusions? So have you had your CD4 count checked lately?

        George M. Carter
tsip29 - 24 Apr 2005 18:41 GMT
...without any focus on condoms there role can easily be ignored.

...If gloves cause so many to suffer and die than clearly so do condoms.

he make a good point there! why should it not be any diffrent with other
latex products..such as condoom!

because there is no study done on that, so it musnt be true  then and it
wouldnt do any harm!
GMCarter - 24 Apr 2005 21:13 GMT
>...without any focus on condoms there role can easily be ignored.
>
>...If gloves cause so many to suffer and die than clearly so do condoms.

LOL. Nope. This is incorrect and data that exist refute this claim
rather than support it.

I'd posted that study almost as frequently as Mark posts his bullshit.

But you can always use a plastic condom.

Or increase dramatically the risk of a sexually transmitted infection
(getting or giving).

        George M. Carter
David Canzi -- non-mailable - 26 Apr 2005 22:18 GMT
>Latex allergy erupted in the United States shortly after the Centers for
>Disease Control introduced universal precautions in 1987. By late 1992,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>The FDA estimated that the reports represented only 1% of actual
>occurrences.6

"Occurrences" is not a synonym for "deaths".

Signature

David Canzi


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.