Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Political agenda behing condom myth

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
PaulKing - 18 Mar 2005 10:27 GMT
Roland's paper shows electron microscopy photos of natural latex. You can
see the natural holes, or intrinsic flaws. The "inherent defects in
natural rubber range between 5 and 70 microns."

And it's not as if governments don't know. A study by Dr. R.F. Carey of
the U.S. Centers for Disease Control reports that "leakage of HIV-sized
particles through latex condoms was detectable for as many as 29 of 89
condoms tested."

These were brand new, pre-approved condoms. But Roland says a closer
reading of Carey's data actually yields a 78% HIV-leakage rate, and
concludes: "

That the CDC would promote condoms based on [this] study...suggests its
agenda is concerned with something other than public health and welfare."

The federal government's standard tests, he adds, "cannot detect flaws
even 70 times larger than the AIDS virus."

Such tests are "blind to leakage volumes less tha one microliter - yet
this quantity of fluid from an AIDS-infected individual has been found to
contain as many as 100,000 HIV particles."
PaulKing - 18 Mar 2005 11:54 GMT
PANACEA OR PLACEBO?

In conclusion, Herbert Ratner, M.D., offers the best summary of all when
he says,
Actually, the major accomplishment of the condom campaign to prevent AIDS
is to impress the promoters, politicians and the public at large that
something is being done; and although well-intentioned, it offers more of
a placebo than a panacea.

Publicizing the condom to the four winds is, for the most part, the
bravura of a puritan who is trying to prove to the world that he is not a
puritan.

To concentrate on the mechanical aspects of the sex act to the exclusion
of the emotional and psychological aspects (which the condom campaign
ignores) is the essence of Puritanism.

The only difference between the new and the old is that whereas the
traditional puritans were alleged to believe that sex was something to be
isolated and repressed, neo-puritans accept sex as something to be
isolated and exercised. (28)

Reviewed by Joel McIlhaney, M.D., of the Medical Institute for Sexual
Health
28.Ratner, Herbert, M.D., "Condoms and AIDS," ALL About Issues, Feb. 1989,
p. 36
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.