Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Faulty testing proceedures

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
PaulKing - 17 Mar 2005 03:10 GMT
Models of STD transmission

Condoms are made to withstand the rigors of sex. But the models used by
governments to test condom durability have nothing to do with sex.

Even if the models used to test condoms are reasonable indicators of
whether a condom will break during sex, and thus whether they will
function adequately in preventing sperm from reaching the female's
reproductive system, but they may be rather poor indicators of whether a
microscopic pathogen can pass from one partner to the other.

For example, the water test can detect holes only as small as 5 mm, but
this sized hole is many times the size of sexually-transmitted viruses and
even of the bacterium Chylamidia.

Similarly, the airburst test is insensitive to small holes. So here we
find new limitations of existing methods of testing condoms: these models
don't give us a good understanding of the barrier to pathogens afforded by
a condom.

That is, these models have serious limitations when considering condoms as
barriers to infectious disease.

http://www.utexas.edu/courses/bio301d/Topics/Condoms/Text.html
GMCarter - 17 Mar 2005 11:52 GMT
>Models of STD transmission
>
>Condoms are made to withstand the rigors of sex. But the models used by
>governments to test condom durability have nothing to do with sex.

Right--they're probably more stringent.

No one cums THAT much or blows THAT hard! LOL.

More crap from Mark.
PaulKing - 17 Mar 2005 23:57 GMT
So Texas University is full of 'crap' or could it be you are the big turd?
GMCarter - 18 Mar 2005 13:23 GMT
>So Texas University is full of 'crap' or could it be you are the big turd?

LOL>..again, this was NOT a statement of the U of Texas but a
STUDENT's sophist views.

Big turd? Damn. You're receding into infantilisms...c'mon, you can do
better than that!!

        George M. Carter
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.