Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

False claims dropped by CDC and USAID

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
PaulKing - 17 Mar 2005 01:19 GMT
Like the CDC, the State Department’s Agency for International Development
(USAID) has censored its web site to remove information on the
effectiveness of condoms. As recently as February 2003, USAID’s web site
included two detailed documents on condom effectiveness.

The document The Effectiveness of Condoms in Preventing Sexually
Transmitted Infections stated: “Latex condoms are highly effective in
prevention of HIV/AIDS” and “Public and government support for latex
condoms is essential for disease prevention.”[5]
The document USAID: HIV/AIDS and Condoms also stated that condoms are
“highly effective for preventing HIV infection.” It called condom
distribution a “cornerstone of USAID’s HIV prevention strategy.”[6]
USAID then substantially altered its web site. The document The
Effectiveness of Condoms in Preventing Sexually Transmitted Infections is
no longer available.

The document USAID: HIV/AIDS and Condoms states only that “condom use can
reduce the risk of HIV infection” and “[w]hile no barrier method is 100
percent effective, correct and consistent use of latex condoms can reduce
the risk of transmission of HIV and some other STIs.”[7]
GMCarter - 17 Mar 2005 11:47 GMT
>Like the CDC, the State Department’s Agency for International Development
>(USAID) has censored its web site to remove information on the
>effectiveness of condoms.

Right--this is what CDC has done under the pressure of the psycho
fundy christians that dictate Bush policy.
PaulKing - 17 Mar 2005 23:58 GMT
No. Under the pressure of 138 studies ALL showing condoms are useless.
GMCarter - 18 Mar 2005 13:21 GMT
>No. Under the pressure of 138 studies ALL showing condoms are useless.

Again, a gross misinterpretation of the data.

Found my reply to this email written last May:
Hey-here is the citation:
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/dmid/stds/condomreport.pdf

Wow. Are you ever a lying, disingenuous sack of sh.t. I know why you
DON'T provide the citation to the reports--cause you cherry pick the
bits that suit your particular delusion. Man, you have the
intellectual honesty and sincerity of George Bush.

        George M. Carter
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.