Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

THE BIG CONDOM LIE - 10,000 doctors say

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
PaulKing - 17 Mar 2005 01:16 GMT
CDC Knew About Condoms' Limitations, Doctors Say

Tuesday, July 24, 2001
By Kelley Beaucar

A group of doctors Tuesday claimed that the federal government,
specifically the Centers for Disease Control, has for at least a year
suppressed a study about the effectiveness of condoms.
The doctors claim that the government has known about the limitations of
condoms in preventing sexually transmitted diseases but
nevertheless mounted a campaign that deliberately misrepresented the risks
in sex education curricula and public health programs.

"The entire public health model developed by the CDC and based on the idea
that condoms offer protection, is a lie," said Dr. Hall Wallis,
a member of consortium. "The skeleton is now out of the closet."

At a Washington, D.C., news conference, the 10,000-member Physicians
Consortium claimed that the CDC has known for years that condoms offer
little protection against sexually transmitted diseases such as gonorrhea,
chlamydia, syphilis and genital herpes.
Word of the condoms’ shortfalls came in a panel report released Friday by
the National Institutes of Health.

The NIH panel concluded that there was "insufficient evidence" that
condoms protect against STDs.
GMCarter - 17 Mar 2005 11:45 GMT
>CDC Knew About Condoms' Limitations, Doctors Say
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>specifically the Centers for Disease Control, has for at least a year
>suppressed a study about the effectiveness of condoms.

LOL. I find this to be exceedinly unlikely.
PaulKing - 21 Mar 2005 07:21 GMT
Seems you have been shown wrong once again.
GMCarter - 21 Mar 2005 11:47 GMT
Seems you have been shown to be wrong as well as a rather clumsy liar
once again.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.