Editor of Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Dr. C. Michael Roland of the
U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington D.C., spoke about his
research on "intrinsic flaws" in latex rubber condoms and surgical gloves
(published in Rubber World, June, 1993).
Roland said that what I am about to relate is "common knowledge among
good
scientists who have no political agenda."
Electron microscopy reveals the HIV virus to be about O.1 microns in size
(a micron is a millionth of a metre). It is 60 times smaller than a
syphilis bacterium, and 450 times smaller than a single human sperm.
The standard U.S. government leakage test (ASTM) will detect water
leakage
through holes only as small as 10 to 12 microns (most condoms sold in
Canada are made in the U.S.A., but I'll mention the Canadian test below).
Roland says in good tests based on these standards, 33% of all condoms
tested allowed HIV-sized particles through, and that "spermicidal agents
such as nonoxonol-9 may actually ease the passage."
Roland's paper shows electron microscopy photos of natural latex. You can
see the natural holes, or intrinsic flaws. The "inherent defects in
natural rubber range between 5 and 70 microns."
And it's not as if governments don't know. A study by Dr. R.F. Carey of
the U.S. Centers for Disease Control reports that "leakage of HIV-sized
particles through latex condoms was detectable for as many as 29 of 89
condoms tested." These were brand new, pre-approved condoms. But Roland
says a closer reading of Carey's data actually yields a 78% HIV-leakage
rate, and concludes: "That the CDC would promote condoms based on [this]
study...suggests its agenda is concerned with something other than public
health and welfare." The federal government's standard tests, he adds,
"cannot detect flaws even 70 times larger than the AIDS virus."
Such tests
are "blind to leakage volumes less tha one microliter - yet this quantity
of fluid from an AIDS-infected individual has been found to contain as
many as 100,000 HIV particles."
As one U.S. surgeon memorably put it, "The HIV virus can go through a
condom like a bullet through a tennis net."
It's the same story with latex gloves. Gloves from four different
manufacturers revealed "pits as large as 15 microns wide and 30 microns
deep."
More relevant to HIV transmission, "5 micron-wide channels,
penetrating the entire thickness were found in all the gloves." He said
the presence of such defects in latex "is well established."
For Canada, the story is the same. A standard Health and Welfare Canada
test of condoms manufactured between 1987 and 1990, based on stringent
tests of pressure, leakage, and volume (as in the U.S., there is no
effort
to examine micron-level leakage), reported that an astonishing 40% of the
condoms tested failed at least one of the tests. Tests in 1991 showed an
"improved" 28% rate.
GMCarter - 17 Mar 2005 01:02 GMT
>Editor of Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Dr. C. Michael Roland of the
>U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington D.C., spoke about his
>research on "intrinsic flaws" in latex rubber condoms and surgical gloves
>(published in Rubber World, June, 1993).
Old news, previously replied to. Condoms have been shown to be
effective in preventing HIV. 100%? Nope. But close--and much better
than taking the advice of a profiteering bastard that wants to make
barebacking porn.
PaulKing - 17 Mar 2005 02:10 GMT
"Condoms have been shown to be
effective in preventing"
Oh really. By who? Even the CDC does not claim that anymore.
You are alone in that delusion.
GMCarter - 17 Mar 2005 11:45 GMT
>"Condoms have been shown to be
>effective in preventing"
>
>Oh really. By who? Even the CDC does not claim that anymore.
Under the psycho Bush administration???
PaulKing - 21 Mar 2005 03:30 GMT
We agree on Bush but the withdrawl of false condom claims had nothing to do
with his puritan madness.
GMCarter - 21 Mar 2005 11:50 GMT
>We agree on Bush but the withdrawl of false condom claims had nothing to do
>with his puritan madness.
LOL. Bullshit. Promoting "abstinence only" is the reason for
withdrawing condom efficacy data. Promoting a peculiar form of
christian fundamentalism is central to his administration. It is one
of the poles a bipolar administration (e.g., Ashcroft). The other pole
is represented by the sick, money/power grubbing, lying and murdering
neocons like Cheney and Wolfowitz. The crusader ethic tied to this
vile immorality has created the single worst administration in US
history.
George M. Carter