Fifteen or so. Nearly all gay.

As anyone who is gay and a porn star will automatically be called 'high
risk' (and whatever they are suffering from labeled 'AIDS) that is hardly
surprising.

Even 15 is hardly above the national average.

Re: rock stars
Posted by Paul King on 3/2/2005; 2:14:54 AM
2 reads

"that might have died from AIDS had they lived longer?"

You really are a touch insane. So why did the thousands who did not die in
car crashes not get so called 'AIDS'?

Do you really believe the garbage you post. I fear so.

P.S. Freddy was a Poppers freak and the other I have not even heard of
(hardly rock stars). The fact remains that this highly sexually active
bunch with their thousands of groupies have far, far BELOW average
'AIDS'.

Explain that.

YOUR LINK: -

http://www.av1611.org/rockdead.html

The fear of the LORD prolongeth days: but the years of the wicked shall be
shortened. Proverbs 10:27 NOTE: This is EVERY death of a Rock star we've
found.

A RELIGIOUS PURITAN FANATICS SITE

ROCKS STAR WHO DIED OF AIDS: -    4 (In 23 years)

Freddie    Mercury    Queen    91-11-24    45    Aids David    Mankaba    Bhundu
Boys    91-10-..         Aids Fela    Kuti         97-08-02    58    Aids
Sean    Hayes         95-07-12    49    Aids

Four (mainly obscure) 'rock stars in twenty years. There have been more
than 25,000 rock groups over that period in America with an average of
four members each.

That gives a figure (if you even believe they really died of 'AIDS') of 4
in 100,000.

The U.S. national average is 6 per 100,000 meaning that this highly
sexually active as far lower 'AIDS' than the national average.

FAR LOWER.

So much for 'AIDS' being an std.

POINT MADE

________

From your link: -

JUST ONE SINGLE FEMALE PORN STAR IN 23 YEARS.

In that time there have been at least 50,000 American female porn
actresses.

That means a 2. per 100,000 rate. THREE TIMES LOWER THAN THE NATIONAL
AVERAGE.

Odd that people who have thousands of sex acts with hundreds and hundreds
of partners have a tiny fraction of the 'AIDS' compared to the general
population.

I could find NOTHING on Sean Hayes

So we have one heart failure, one Poppers addict (Freddy Mercury) and one
very obscure musician in South Africa left.

A total of two that could even possibly be called 'AIDS'.

Pathetic

Hardly an impressive list for over twenty years taken world wide.

As I said Rock Stars don't get so called 'AIDS'.

If these people found David    Mankaba, Fela    Kuti    (who actually died of 'heart
failure)and Sean    Hayes (who I could find nothing about re cause of death)
they sure did a thorough job of research.

Your attempt to evade the truth is as pathetic as usual.

Any 'rock star' of the slightest note would be publicized to the four
winds if they were said to have died of 'AIDS' , as you well know.

think of the song 'we are the champions..."

b/

U.N.: AIDS May Kill 80M Africans by 2025
By ANTHONY MITCHELL, Associated Press Writer
ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia (AP) --

More than 80 million Africans may die from AIDS by 2025, the United Nations
said in a report released Friday, and infections could soar to 90 million -
or more than 10 percent of the continent's population - if more isn't done
soon to fight the disease.

More than 25 million African have been infected with HIV, the virus that
causes AIDS. UNAIDS estimated that nearly $200 billion is needed to save 16
million people from death and 43 million people from becoming infected, but
donors have pledged nowhere near that amount.

In its report, "AIDS in Africa," the U.N. agency examines three potential
scenarios for the continent in the next 20 years depending on the
international community's response.

Researchers determined that even with massive funding and better treatment,
the number of Africans who will die from AIDS is likely to top 67 million in
the next two decades.

"What we do today will change the future," concluded the report, drawn up by
some of the world's leading experts on HIV and AIDS. "These scenarios
demonstrate that, while societies will have to deal with AIDS for some time
to come, the extent of the epidemic's impact will depend on the responses
and investment now."

The three scenarios include a best-case situation, a middle-case and a
doomsday scenario. They all warn that the worst of the epidemic's impact is
still to come.

"There is no single policy prescription that will change the outcome of the
epidemic," the report stated. "The death toll will continue to rise no
matter what is done."

Under the worst-case scenario, experts have plotted current policies and
funding over the next two decades.

"It offers a disturbing window on the future death toll across the
continent, with the cumulative number of people dying from AIDS increasing
more than fourfold," it says. "The number of children orphaned by the
epidemic will continue to rise beyond 2025."

While there is no cure for HIV or AIDS, anti-retroviral drugs can allow
sufferers to live a normal life. Such drugs, though, are too expensive for
most Africans, who live on less than a dollar a day and don't have access to
modern health care.

Experts have said donors' money needs to be spent to train more health
workers, develop better clinics and subsidize medications as well as promote
more prevention programs.

AIDS already has a devastating impact on Africa.

UNAIDS has reported that life expectancy in nine countries has dropped to
below 40 because of the disease. There are already 11 million orphans
because of AIDS, while 6,500 people are dying each day. In 2004, 3.1 million
Africans were newly infected, the agency said.

"If by 2025, millions of African people are still becoming infected with HIV
each year, these scenarios suggest that it will not be because there was no
choice," the report said. "It will be because, collectively, there was
insufficient political will to change behavior at all levels, from the
institution, to the community, to the individual, and halt the forces
driving the AIDS epidemic in Africa."

Hundreds of experts and people living with the virus helped draw up the
report.