That would be true if stds were easily transmitted and common.
As I, nor any of my friends suffered greatly (if at all) from stds it
proves that they are not a problem.
If you were right everyone in Hollywood in the 60's, 70's and 80's would
have had the clap 24/7.
They did not.
Forget your insane obsession with stds and get real.
SEX IS VERY VERY SAFE. PERIOD. END OF STORY.
dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu - 27 Feb 2005 17:29 GMT
> My whole point is there are drug addcts, they (Hollywood club goers)
> had hundreds of partners, and were NOT monogamous.......and still
> didn't have above average stds and no so called 'AIDS' (I have not
> known of one single case).
> http://notb4weknow.editthispage.com/discuss/msgReader$241
We have no way of verifying that. They could go to private
physicians. They could stay outside the normal medical
establishment in having data about them tracked. There's
nothing new about this in history. Elite groups have always
done that. Something like the conservatives who are against
women having the right to have an abortion are having
abortions. This happens to all classes of people. They are
still going to have abortions. The abortions will be
private. There won't be any data about it. But they will
have it. And then convince other people to behave a certain
way.
You are trying to create another reality that seems
different from mine. You know, while we are thinking about
the world and planning you are creating new realities and
passing us by. And we are looking at it and wondering. You
are creating new realities.
By Ron Susskind
http://www.mth.msu.edu/~shapiro/Opinion/Susskind.html
The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the
reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who
''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of
discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about
enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me
off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,''
he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we
create our own reality. And while you're studying that
reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again,
creating other new realities, which you can study too, and
that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors
. . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what
we do.''
http://www.mth.msu.edu/~shapiro/Opinion/Susskind.html
dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu - 27 Feb 2005 17:32 GMT
> My whole point is there are drug addcts, they (Hollywood club goers)
> had hundreds of partners, and were NOT monogamous.......and still
> didn't have above average stds and no so called 'AIDS' (I have not
> known of one single case).
> http://notb4weknow.editthispage.com/discuss/msgReader$241
We have no way of verifying that. They could go to private
physicians. They could stay outside the normal medical
establishment in having data about them tracked. There's
nothing new about this in history. Elite groups have always
done that. Something like the conservatives who are against
women having the right to have an abortion are having
abortions. This happens to all classes of people. They are
still going to have abortions. The abortions will be
private. There won't be any data about it. But they will
have it. And then convince other people to behave a certain
way.
You are trying to create another reality that seems
different from mine. You know, while we are thinking about
the world and planning you are creating new realities and
passing us by. And we are looking at it and wondering. You
are creating new realities.
By Ron Susskind
http://www.mth.msu.edu/~shapiro/Opinion/Susskind.html
The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the
reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who
''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of
discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about
enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me
off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,''
he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we
create our own reality. And while you're studying that
reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again,
creating other new realities, which you can study too, and
that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors
. . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what
we do.''
http://www.mth.msu.edu/~shapiro/Opinion/Susskind.html