Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Chain of exposures.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu - 26 Feb 2005 13:50 GMT
Before the sexually transmitted diseases that you have had were
cured, you may have passed infections on to sex partners who in turn
passed them on and so on in an epidemic chain. Infections can be
silent and unknowingly passed along to people you care about as well
as people about whom you might not care. By the time your symptoms
did appear, your sex partners may have in turn passed along
infection they got from you. Diagram the chain of sexually
transmitted infections you and your sex partners have had. The
diagram will show how the chain of sex partners exposed one
another. Detecting infections early and curing them prevents another
person from getting them and prevents the chain of exposures.

See also
By Tom Lehrer
I Got It From Agnes
http://members.aol.com/quentncree/lehrer/agnes.htm
http://www.artistdirect.com/nad/window/media/player/0,,270180-4023437-WMLO,00.html
PaulKing - 26 Feb 2005 21:08 GMT
That would be true if stds were easily transmitted and common.

As I, nor any of my friends suffered greatly (if at all) from stds it
proves that they are not a problem.

If you were right everyone in Hollywood in the 60's, 70's and 80's would
have had the clap 24/7.

They did not.

Forget your insane obsession with stds and get real.

SEX IS VERY VERY SAFE. PERIOD. END OF STORY.
dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu - 27 Feb 2005 17:29 GMT
> My whole point is there are drug addcts, they (Hollywood club goers)
> had hundreds of partners, and were NOT monogamous.......and still
> didn't have above average stds and no so called 'AIDS' (I have not
> known of one single case).
> http://notb4weknow.editthispage.com/discuss/msgReader$241

         We have no way of verifying that. They could go to private
         physicians. They could stay outside the normal medical
         establishment in having data about them tracked. There's
         nothing new about this in history. Elite groups have always
         done that. Something like the conservatives who are against
         women having the right to have an abortion are having
         abortions. This happens to all classes of people. They are
         still going to have abortions. The abortions will be
         private. There won't be any data about it. But they will
         have it. And then convince other people to behave a certain
         way.

         You are trying to create another reality that seems
         different from mine. You know, while we are thinking about
         the world and planning you are creating new realities and
         passing us by. And we are looking at it and wondering. You
         are creating new realities.

         By Ron Susskind
         http://www.mth.msu.edu/~shapiro/Opinion/Susskind.html
         The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the
         reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who
         ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of
         discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about
         enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me
         off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,''
         he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we
         create our own reality. And while you're studying that
         reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again,
         creating other new realities, which you can study too, and
         that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors
         . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what
         we do.''
         http://www.mth.msu.edu/~shapiro/Opinion/Susskind.html
dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu - 27 Feb 2005 17:32 GMT
> My whole point is there are drug addcts, they (Hollywood club goers)
> had hundreds of partners, and were NOT monogamous.......and still
> didn't have above average stds and no so called 'AIDS' (I have not
> known of one single case).
> http://notb4weknow.editthispage.com/discuss/msgReader$241

         We have no way of verifying that. They could go to private
         physicians. They could stay outside the normal medical
         establishment in having data about them tracked. There's
         nothing new about this in history. Elite groups have always
         done that. Something like the conservatives who are against
         women having the right to have an abortion are having
         abortions. This happens to all classes of people. They are
         still going to have abortions. The abortions will be
         private. There won't be any data about it. But they will
         have it. And then convince other people to behave a certain
         way.

         You are trying to create another reality that seems
         different from mine. You know, while we are thinking about
         the world and planning you are creating new realities and
         passing us by. And we are looking at it and wondering. You
         are creating new realities.

         By Ron Susskind
         http://www.mth.msu.edu/~shapiro/Opinion/Susskind.html
         The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the
         reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who
         ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of
         discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about
         enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me
         off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,''
         he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we
         create our own reality. And while you're studying that
         reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again,
         creating other new realities, which you can study too, and
         that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors
         . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what
         we do.''
         http://www.mth.msu.edu/~shapiro/Opinion/Susskind.html

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.