 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / March 2005Reyataz (atazanavir) and Combivir
I just started my first drug therapy, Reyataz plus Combivir. So far so good, and no side effects; I'm honestly kinds surprised, I was bracing myself for a terrible time. Anyone else with experience on this combo? At the Owen Clinic of the University of California, San Diego, a study of nearly 5,000 patients who sought care for HIV showed a drop in the death rate starting in 1995, but then an upswing among those who came to the clinic after 1998. (5 ) A survey of almost 3,000 people enrolled in five US antiretroviral trials between December 1996 and December 2001 plotted a dogged doubling of the death rate every 12 months, from 3.9 percent after one year of follow-up, to 7.9 percent after two, and to 13.1 percent after three. (6) (5). Mathews W, Barber E. Rising mortality rates among recent entrants to care for HIV infection. 10th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. February 10-14, 2003. Boston. Abstract 911. (6). Reisler RB, Han C, Burman WJ, et al. Grade 4 events are as important as AIDS events in the era of HAART. JAIDS 2003;34:379-386. Ignore Paul Kings posts he lies and distorts, and is one of those nut jobs whose desire to freely f.ck anything he can causes him to be blind to reality. As to your new med's I've been on Combivir before it was created (almost a decade at first taking AZT and Epivir separately before they were combined in Combivir) with no side effects. I have not used Reyataz. Did your doctor tell you why he choose to start you on Reyataz instead of Kaletra as that is the FDA's preferred drug for treatment naive patients with Reyataz being classed as an alternative. Gary Stein > At the Owen Clinic of the University of California, San Diego, a study of > nearly 5,000 patients who sought care for HIV showed a drop in the death [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > (6). Reisler RB, Han C, Burman WJ, et al. Grade 4 events are as important > as AIDS events in the era of HAART. JAIDS 2003;34:379-386. "No side effects' my foot. How can you tell such lies. You are a criminal and complete nutcase to use your language. Your insane lies actually kill people. Shame on you. “Use of protease inhibitors was strongly associated with the likelihood of having a myocardial infarction [heart attack] and correlated with diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidaemia.” Lancet. 2002 Nov 30;360(9347) – Holmberg SD, et al, Aids Researchers “The most common cause of death among HIV positive people (being treated with AIDS meds) is liver failure.” – Amy Justice, Aids Researcher, 14th International AIDS Conference in Barcelona, 2002 Paul Kings comments have been terribly helpful to me - stats at his fingers he has! Does he also have an equally "handy" agenda that he can tell us about? What does he suggest for HIV positive people, or, wait....don't please let us start Paul now with the "Hiv myth" BS. "stats at his fingers he has!" Funny how we have the facts and apologists have the hysterical nonsense. Seems you like emotion and fear better than fact. Your choice. MORE FACTS YOU WILL NOT LIKE: - Poverty and 'AIDS' - No connection? HIGHEST POVERTY RATES Florida: Urban 23% All 20% New York: Urban 20% All 19% Calif: Urban 19% All 19% LOWEST POVERTY RATES Vermont: Urban 8% All 10,5% New Hampshire: Urban 8.5% All 8.5% HIGHEST AIDS BY RATING Florida: Number 3 New York: Number 1 California: Number 2 LOW AIDS RATINGS Vermont: Number 47 New Hampshire: Number 44 So do you really think there is no connection between so called 'AIDS' and poverty in America? Immune suppression is caused mainly by poverty NOT some wonder virus. Source: - http://www.statehealthfacts.org >Paul Kings comments have been terribly helpful to me - stats at his >fingers he has! Does he also have an equally "handy" agenda that he can >tell us about? What does he suggest for HIV positive people, or, >wait....don't please let us start Paul now with the "Hiv myth" BS. "Paul King" is a false identity -- what's known as a "sock puppet". The real identity -- the hand in the sock -- is Mark Hanau. He is involved in some way in the adult industry (pornography). Almost 10 years ago, in a letter to an industry publication, he said "if the adult industry buys into the AIDS terror campaign, the US government will close us down on health not moral grounds." He denies that he has a financial interest in pornography, but that denial comes from a man who lies like a spammer, and has been shown to be lying many times. He also claims to have had sex with 2800 different partners. (If not just another lie, this is almost certainly an overcount. A man who has had sex with a statistical population is unlikely to recognize a woman the second and third time he meets her.) He takes pride in never having used a condom. The logic of the quote "if the adult industry buys into the AIDS terror campaign, the US government will close us down on health not moral grounds," is strange. It is what the government believes, not what the adult industry believes, that determines the government's actions towards the adult industry. His letter to an adult industry publication is not going to influence the government -- it's going to influence the adult industry. If the people in (or potentially recruitable into) the adult industry took AIDS seriously, what effect would that have on the adult industry? What effect might that have on Mark Hanau's finances and/or working conditions? That would be his real concern. The threat of government action against the adult industry was just a boogeyman he was using to frighten the adult industry in the direction he prefers.  SignatureDavid Canzi Pathetic attempt at a smear. You cannot even manage that right. All you show is you are a low life lier with no morals and an over active imagination.. Keep it up. It helps us no end. Great job proving our point that you are scum. >Pathetic attempt at a smear. You cannot even manage that right. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Great job proving our point that you are scum. You are Mark Hanau, and you are involved in some capacity in the adult industry: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=ctchfd%24fqe%241%40rumours.uwaterloo.ca Pornography buyers mostly want to see young women. The adult industry needs to recruit young women to replace its older female performers. And though some pornography is being made in which the performers wear condoms, most buyers don't want to see condoms. The more young women there are who believe that AIDS is not sexually transmitted and that condoms cause cancer, the more young women there will be who can be recruited into the adult industry to perform without condoms. Spreading AIDS dissidency improves adult industry profits. SignatureDavid Canzi > The more young women there are who believe that AIDS is not sexually > transmitted and that condoms cause cancer, the more young women > there will be who can be recruited into the adult industry to perform > without condoms. > > Spreading AIDS dissidency improves adult industry profits. heh. how apropos deep throat's famous quote to woodward and bernstein was 'follow the money' ... i guess the paraphrase would be 'follow the money shot.' b/ True. Follow the money and you get to the root of this 'AIDS' scam. "Spreading AIDS dissidency improves adult industry profits." Actually I would expect quite the opposite is true. People who are getting lots of sex watch far LESS porn. The porn industry boomed AFTER so called 'AIDS' not before. Bad point but you are the expert at that. You are such a low life idiot and scum bag. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.