Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HIV infections double on the down low crowd

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Death - 26 Feb 2005 03:22 GMT
By JEFF DONN

BOSTON (AP) - The HIV infection rate has doubled among blacks in the United
States over a decade while holding steady among whites - stark evidence of a
widening racial gap in the epidemic, government scientists said Friday.

Other troubling statistics indicate that almost half of all infected people
in the United States who should be receiving HIV drugs are not getting them.

The findings were released in Boston at the 12th Annual Retrovirus
Conference, the world's chief scientific gathering on the disease.

"It's incredibly disappointing," said Terje Anderson, director of the
National Association of People With AIDS. "We just have a burgeoning
epidemic in the African American community that is not being dealt with
effectively."

Researchers and AIDS prevention advocates attributed the high rate among
blacks to such factors as drug addiction, poverty and poor access to health
care.

The HIV rates were derived from the widely used National Health and
Nutrition Examinations Surveys, which analyze a representative sample of
U.S. households and contain the most complete HIV data in the country.
Researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention compared
1988-1994 data with figures from 1999-2002.

The surveys look only at young and middle-aged adults who live in
households, excluding such groups as soldiers, prisoners and homeless. Thus,
health officials believe the numbers probably underestimate true HIV rates
in this country.

Still, they show a striking rise in the prevalence of the AIDS virus from 1
percent to 2 percent of blacks. White rates held steady at 0.2 percent.
Largely because of the increase among blacks, the overall U.S. rate rose
slightly from 0.3 percent to 0.4 percent.

Smaller studies had shown rising infection rates among blacks in recent
years, but this study takes a longer and more complete look at changes in
the general population.

"I think it's very concerning," said Dr. Susan Buchbinder, who leads HIV
research for the city of San Francisco. "I think what we need to look at is
how we can reduce those rates and get more people into treatment."

She recommended a stronger focus on treating drug addiction.

The lead CDC researcher, Geraldine McQuillan, said she was encouraged to see
the HIV rate among younger blacks holding steady at just under 1.5 percent.

"It tells me we're making some headway," she said.

Other national data and published reports studied by the CDC showed that
480,000 HIV-infected people ages 15 to 49 should have been getting antiviral
drugs in 2003, yet only 268,000, or 56 percent, were given such medication.

Researcher Eyasu Teshale of the CDC said the gap represents "a substantial
unmet health care need."

Treatment is widely viewed as a central component in prevention. Powerful
AIDS drugs that came into wide use in the mid-1990s can knock down levels of
the virus in the body, reducing the chances that the patient will infect
others.

Nearly 1 million people in the United States have contracted the AIDS virus
since the outbreak began in the early 1980s. About 40,000 people test
positive each year, and more than 18,000 die. However, U.S. infections have
remained fairly level in recent years with the use of powerful HIV drugs.
PaulKing - 26 Feb 2005 04:08 GMT
" stark evidence of a widening racial gap in the epidemic"

SHOULD READ

"stark evidence of a widening racial gap in the distribution of real
poverty in America"

Poverty (poor nutrition, parasites, Crack addiction, damp living
conditions etc) NOT sex cause so called 'AIDS'.

Who could possibly believe that African Americans have 200 times more sex
than Caucasians?

Absurd.

P.S. 'AIDS' is not even in the top 15 diseases in America. Hardly an
'epidemic' except of lies.
Death - 26 Feb 2005 19:22 GMT
PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote in message
> " stark evidence of a widening racial gap in the epidemic"
>
> SHOULD READ
>
> "stark evidence of a widening racial gap in the distribution of real
> poverty in America"

Poverty, is a strawman.

No one has ever gotten aids because of poverty.

Having sex with an infected person
weather they be rich or poor is the reason for the
spread of aids.
Cousin It - 26 Feb 2005 20:06 GMT
"Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote...
> PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote in message
>> " stark evidence of a widening racial gap in the epidemic"
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> weather they be rich or poor is the reason for the
> spread of aids.

For example, dead fashion designer Versace was HIV+ and he was
very rich.  Go to any gay club and you will see it packed with
gays in expensive designer clothes spending hundreds of dollars
a night on booze, meth, and ecstacy - hardly "poverty" at all
yet most of them are HIV+.

The leftists are trying to make this into some sort of racial
issue, and I'm surprised they haven't actually used the word
"racism" yet as the cause of the doubling of the black HIV+
infection rate.  In this sense, "poverty" is a code word for
"racism," as it is implied that blacks are poor because they
are victims of white racism and discrimination.  If only the
government had spent several trillion more dollars on welfare
programs and HIV prevention propaganda for the black
community there wouldn't be a problem.
PaulKing - 27 Feb 2005 09:42 GMT
Well I will use it.

'AIDS' says that 'those dirty oversexed black people are getting ill
because they cannot stop f.cking'.

It is the old racist myth in a new even more evil form.
PaulKing - 27 Feb 2005 09:40 GMT
"No one has ever gotten aids because of poverty."

Don't be so silly. Immune suppression existed LONG BEFORE SO CALLED'AIDS'
and then as now was mainly confined to the very poor.

You can give immune suppression a new name but it remains EXACTLY the same
thing.
PaulKing - 27 Feb 2005 10:31 GMT
Poverty and 'AIDS' - No connection?

HIGHEST POVERTY RATES

Florida: Urban 23% All 20%
New York: Urban 20% All 19%
Calif: Urban 19% All 19%

LOWEST POVERTY RATES

Vermont: Urban 8% All 10,5%
New Hampshire: Urban 8.5% All 8.5%

HIGHEST AIDS BY RATING

Florida: Number 3
New York: Number 1
California: Number 2

LOW AIDS RATINGS

Vermont: Number 47
New Hampshire: Number 44

So do you really think there is no connection between 'AIDS' and poverty?

Source: - http://www.statehealthfacts.org
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 27 Feb 2005 23:46 GMT
>Poverty and 'AIDS' - No connection?
[snip]
>HIGHEST AIDS BY RATING
>Florida: Number 3
>New York: Number 1
>California: Number 2
[snip]
>Source: - http://www.statehealthfacts.org

Go back to that site, and try to account for the disparity between
the rankings of Maryland and Delaware in the tables "AIDS Case Rate
All Ages" (3rd and 5th) and "Poverty Rate by Metropolitan Status"
(tied for 33rd).

You apparently used one of the tables based on the number of cases
(rather than cases per population), which causes large states like
California to get sorted above smaller states that actually have
higher rates of AIDS.

Signature

David Canzi


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.