Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / February 2005
AIDS in S. Africa
|
|
Thread rating:  |
GMCarter - 18 Feb 2005 20:51 GMT http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/international/international-safrica-aids.html?hp& ex=1108789200&en=ec2a029b1432b68a&ei=5094&partner=homepage
AIDS Blamed as South Africa's Death Rate Soars By REUTERS
Published: February 18, 2005
Filed at 11:11 A.M. ET
PRETORIA, Feb 18 (Reuters) - South Africa's death toll soared by 57 percent in the five years to 2002, new figures on Friday showed, underscoring how the country's AIDS epidemic is cutting a swathe through its working-age population.
Releasing figures from a widely awaited national mortality study, Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) said reported deaths leapt to 499,268 in 2002 from 318,287 in 1997.
The report looks likely to spark new debate over the extent of the AIDS crisis in South Africa, where President Thabo Mbeki's government is often accused by critics of both underplaying and underestimating the crisis.
The study "provides indirect evidence that the HIV epidemic in South Africa is raising the mortality levels of prime aged adults," Stats SA head Pali Lehohla said in a statement.
AIDS is increasingly seen as a threat to South Africa's future, with officials saying that up to 23 percent of its armed forces are infected with HIV and key industries including mining hard hit by the epidemic.
Stats SA said that among adults over 15, deaths increased by 62 percent between 1997 and 2002.
The report showed deaths increasing most rapidly for women and people aged between 20 and 49 -- both regarded as groups most susceptible to the AIDS virus, which affects an estimated one in nine of the country's 45 million people.
"Death from AIDS of working age adults is a real and immediate crisis," the opposition Democratic Alliance said in a statement responding to the new numbers on Friday.
"Many of the adults who are dying, including nurses and teachers, are critical to South Africa's future. Yet the government has no comprehensive human resources plan in place to address this," the DA statement said.
THREE MILLION DEATH CERTIFICATES
The Stats SA study was based on 3 million official death certificates recorded over a five-year period. It said that on average 1,368 South Africans died every day in 2002, compared with just 872 deaths a day in 1997.
"It is in the 30 to 34 age group that we are seeing a very, very high percentage of deaths being registered," said Liz Gavin, the agency's director of population statistics. Stats SA said part of the increase could be attributed to overall growth in South Africa's population -- up an estimated 10 percent over the period -- as well as a more comprehensive death reporting system.
But experts agreed that hidden behind the numbers was a real and escalating AIDS death toll.
"The report ... indicates an unabating HIV/AIDS epidemic," said David Bourne, chief researcher at the University of Cape Town's School of Public Health.
Officials said exact causes of death remained difficult to ascertain, as in many cases common AIDS-related diseases such as tuberculosis, influenza or pneumonia were officially recorded as responsible.
These three diseases are killing many more South Africans than before as the AIDS virus spreads through the population.
Pneumonia was listed as responsible for 51,000 deaths in 2001 compared with 22,000 in 1997, while the toll from influenza and pneumonia jumped to 31,000 from 12,000 in the same period.
HIV, the subject of intense social stigma in South Africa where publicly funded AIDS drug treatment became available only last year, was directly blamed for only 9,000 deaths in 2001 against 6,000 four years earlier.
AIDS activists have sought to press the South African government into a more aggressive stance against the HIV/AIDS epidemic, saying that both stigma and lack of publicly available treatment were hindering the fight against the disease.
South Africa last year launched a public anti-retroviral drug programme, but implementation remains slow with tens of thousands of prospective patients still unable to access the life-saving medication.
Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, speaking on Friday before the Stats SA figures were released, said the government was doing its best amid confusion about the extent of the disease and numbers of people needing treatment.
"Give me a country that has precise figures. Everybody is working on projections and we were working on projections too," she told reporters in Cape Town.
"You really are working in the dark ... so you just give the medicines hoping God will help us and be on our side."
Alex - 19 Feb 2005 03:29 GMT Hear the spinning start.
The death certificate data SHOWS AIDS as a cause of death in 2.0% to 2.6% of all deaths IN ANY GIVEN YEAR.
The highest number of AIDS deaths in any given year was just under 10,000.
Alex
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/international/international-safrica-aids.html?hp& ex=1108789200&en=ec2 a029b1432b68a&ei=5094&partner=homepage
> AIDS Blamed as South Africa's Death Rate Soars > By REUTERS [quoted text clipped - 101 lines] > "You really are working in the dark ... so you just give the medicines > hoping God will help us and be on our side." George DeCarlo - 19 Feb 2005 04:29 GMT ** Its seems Reuters is writing a misrepresentation of the numbers.
George DeCarlo
From: David
I have downloaded the latest Stats SA report on mortality for 1997-2003. It is 744 kb. I will happily send the pdf on request. You can also download it yourself at http://www.statssa.gov.za/
I have plotted deaths from all causes and compared it to previous data from Stats SA. The mortality is a linear for 1997-2003, and no different from what I had plotted previously. No sign of anything unusual mortality.
Dave
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 19 Feb 2005 05:59 GMT >** Its seems Reuters is writing a misrepresentation of the numbers. >From: David >I have plotted deaths from all causes and compared it to previous data >from Stats SA. The mortality is a linear for 1997-2003, and no >different from what I had plotted previously. No sign of anything >unusual mortality. From 1998 to 2002, tuberculosis deaths doubled, and deaths in the 30-34 year old age group almost doubled. But no sign of anything unusual.
 Signature David Canzi
Alex - 19 Feb 2005 06:45 GMT > >** Its seems Reuters is writing a misrepresentation of the numbers. > >From: David [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > From 1998 to 2002, tuberculosis deaths doubled, and deaths in the 30-34 > year old age group almost doubled. But no sign of anything unusual. Coverage of death reporting improved. The population grew by a few million (40.6 million in 1996 to 44.8 million in 2001). Lastly, tuberculosis is not an AIDS defining illness (unless of course, you believe that ANY infection is an AIDS defining illness - which means by implication that there are no specific AIDS defining illnesses).
Most importantly, the percentage of registered deaths attributed to HIV/AIDS is EXTREMELY consistent. 2.0% to 2.6% of all recorded deaths.
Check for the following data in Appendix E:
Human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] diseases (B20 - B24) Year - number of deaths - (as a % of total registered deaths)
1997 6,234 (2.0%) 1998 7,266 (2.0) 1999 9,925 (2.6) 2000 10,926 (2.6) 2001 9,212 (2.0) 2002 10,425 (2.1) 2003 (----) (2.1)
The percentage of deaths attributed to HIV did not change in any significant way at all. Even though the number did increase, it increased from a very low base. From 6,234 to 10,425. This is in a country of (now) 47,000,000.
Alex
The report is available online, at: http://www.statssa.gov.za/Publications/publicationsearch.asp?PN=fqtqz.t&PM=&PY=&PS=1
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 20 Feb 2005 18:11 GMT >> >No sign of anything >> >unusual mortality. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Coverage of death reporting improved. From 1997 to 2002, reported deaths increased 147% for the 30-34 age group, and only 23% for the 55-59 age group. The likelihood of a death being reported is extremely sensitive to the age of the deceased. But no sign of anything unusual.
age 1997 2002 ratio --- ---- ---- ----- 0-4 34779 48572 1.40 5-9 2970 4339 1.46 10-14 2746 3339 1.22 15-19 6257 8977 1.43 20-24 13574 21838 1.61 25-29 18227 41412 2.27 30-34 18903 46758 2.47 35-39 18733 43020 2.30 40-44 18086 36614 2.02 45-49 18530 31681 1.71 50-54 17495 29613 1.69 55-59 20543 25270 1.23 60-64 20467 28704 1.40 65-69 23501 26902 1.14 70-74 21352 29095 1.36 75-79 23525 23875 1.01 80-84 15388 23655 1.54 85-89 10881 12668 1.16 90+ 6759 10947 1.62
>Lastly, tuberculosis is not an AIDS defining illness (unless of course, >you believe that ANY infection is an AIDS defining illness - which >means by implication that there are no specific AIDS defining illnesses). AIDS makes people more susceptible to TB. In the presence of an AIDS epidemic hidden by under-reporting, we would expect to see an otherwise unexplained increase in TB.
AIDS or no AIDS, a doubling of TB deaths in 4 years is remarkable. Can you claim, as the person I was responding to did, that there is "no sign of anything unusual" here?
 Signature David Canzi
Alex - 20 Feb 2005 23:19 GMT > >> >No sign of anything > >> >unusual mortality. [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > 85-89 10881 12668 1.16 > 90+ 6759 10947 1.62 First of all, all developing countries have a pyramid shaped demography. The majority of the population is always under 25, while there are very few old people. The reason is that a lot of people who in the West would simply get medical help, don't have the money to do so and simply die of what are otherwise curable diseases. Cancer doesn't get caught early, tb doesn't get caught, there are still a lot of people who die of malaria, exposure to banned chemicals like DDT, etc.
This is true whether we are talking about South Africa, or Iran. (See the graphs at the bottom of the page at http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/idbsum?cty=sf (South Africa) http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/idbsum?cty=ir (Iran) )
It is important to remember that this has nothing to do with AIDS.
> >Lastly, tuberculosis is not an AIDS defining illness (unless of course, > >you believe that ANY infection is an AIDS defining illness - which [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > AIDS or no AIDS, a doubling of TB deaths in 4 years is remarkable. It is. However, one should at all times consider the effect of improved coverage.
The ANC had a big task in pulling together all the data (mortality and otherwise) from the former "independent homelands" (Transkei, Kwazulu, Kwakwa, etc.). They came to power in 1994, and I think the consensus is that only the data from 1998 onwards is remotely representative for the entire nation.
Also, it is very well possible, that with the falling away of pass laws and restrictions in internal migration, increased urbanisation would have led to better coverage in later years. It would be more difficult to keep good records in South Africa's remote countryside, than in the cities.
> Can you claim, as the person I was responding to did, that there is > "no sign of anything unusual" here? There is a high number of TB cases (the leading cause of death in 2002). However, when is TB just TB? Could it also be a sign of a deteriorating quality of life - poverty? Increased close living quarters in the cities?
The point is, that even if you add up all cases of HIV (10,425 in 2002) and all the TB cases (59,951 in the same year), you still don't get anywhere near the number of AIDS deaths that are projected for South Africa by the WHO/UNAIDS (370,000 in 2003).
Alex
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 21 Feb 2005 06:05 GMT >> >> From 1998 to 2002, tuberculosis deaths doubled, and deaths in the 30-34 >> >> year old age group almost doubled. But no sign of anything unusual. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >First of all, all developing countries have a pyramid shaped demography. Irrelevant.
The age distribution of the population and improvements in the completeness of death reporting cannot account for why, in 5 years, reported deaths went up 147% for the 30-34 age range, but only 23% for the 55-59 age range. Nor can they account for why, in 4 years, reported TB deaths went up 110% while ischaemic heart disease went up only 15%.
Reported Cause of Death 1998 2002 %increase ----------------------- ---- ---- --------- Tuberculosis 28487 59951 110% Ischaemic heart diseases 10687 12303 15%
You would be better off simply admitting that these phenomena are mysterious to you, instead of trying to explain them.
 Signature David Canzi
Alex - 21 Feb 2005 08:11 GMT > >> >> From 1998 to 2002, tuberculosis deaths doubled, and deaths in the 30-34 > >> >> year old age group almost doubled. But no sign of anything unusual. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > reported TB deaths went up 110% while ischaemic heart disease went > up only 15%. The percentage increases are irrelevant, if they increase from a very low base to begin with.
The fact is, that if you add all HIV deaths and add all TB deaths, you are still only at about 70,000.
Nowhere near the WHO/UNAIDS 370,000 number for the year 2003.
And besides, when all is said and done, this is what the data are. 10,425 HIV deaths in the year 2002. It is up to your side to prove that TB deaths are really HIV deaths.
Alex
|
|
|