Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / February 2005
Malaria and HIV
|
|
Thread rating:  |
GMCarter - 17 Feb 2005 13:49 GMT Malaria Increases HIV Viral Load AIDSmap.org (1/19/05) Smart T
Acute malaria episodes are associated with a marked increase in HIV viral load, according to a study by a team of Malawian and American researchers published in the January 15 issue of The Lancet (365:9455, p. 233, 2005). Although the increase in HIV viral load resolves with effective anti-malarial treatment, the study researchers propose that malaria episodes could facilitate HIV transmission and accelerate disease progression - especially if the parasite burden is high and accompanied by fever.
Malaria the coinfection Malaria is a disease caused by several species of Plasmodium, a parasite that can be transmitted by mosquito bites, primarily in tropical regions of the world. Over 300 million people contract malaria each year; one million of them die. Most of the fatalities are children. In the areas of highest risk, exposure to the malaria parasite is so persistent that children develop a functional immunity to the parasite by the age of five - or else they simply don't survive. Immune' adults are still bitten and can be infected by the parasite, however the parasite burden is lower and with few or no symptoms.
Approximately 90% of the malaria cases occur in sub-Saharan Africa where the burden of HIV is also high. Yet, while malaria is one of the most important diseases in the world, its role as an HIV coinfection has perhaps been under-appreciated. Recent studies have shown that the two diseases can have a number of harmful interactions. For example, pregnant women with HIV are at a greatly increased risk of malaria - even if they were previously immune to the organism. HIV also increases the risk of malaria crossing the placenta and affecting the foetus. Conversely, the risk of HIV transmission to the child is increased when there is placental malaria.
Other studies in the regions suggest an increased risk of symptomatic malaria among people with AIDS. There are indications that adults may gradually lose malaria immunity as their immune system weakens. Also, malaria diagnosis is often made using simple clinical criteria - fever - that can be mimicked or masked by HIV/AIDS and its opportunistic infections. However, the effect of malaria on the course of HIV infection has not been as well characterised, and initial reports of any interaction have been inconclusive. While an earlier study in Malawi found higher HIV loads in patients with malaria than those without, the difference could not be clearly attributed to malaria, since the patient's viral loads before illness were unknown.
Study in Malawi For this prospectively designed study, researchers recruited 334 HIV positive adults who were free of malaria parasites at the start of the study. The plan was to monitor these patients closely for acute episodes of malaria using four definitions: parasitaemia (any detectable parasite in the blood), parasite density above 2000/ L, parasitaemia with fever, and parasite density above 2000/ l and fever. Viral loads were measured at baseline, during malaria and after anti-malarial treatment (when possible). Patients were also stratified depending upon baseline CD4 cell counts above 300 and 300 and below. Baseline characteristics, such as age, sex, and employment status, were similar across strata. During follow-up, 148 patients had at least one malaria episode and received antimalarial treatment. Of these 77 had viral load measurements at all three key timepoints. In these patients, the median baseline viral load was 96,215 copies/ml.
When malaria was defined simply as parasitaemia, episodes were found to transiently increase viral load by 0.25 log (95% CI 0.11-0.39, p = 0.0003 within this stratum). About 8-9 weeks after treatment for malaria, the patient's viral loads returned to levels similar to those at baseline. In a control group of 23 patients who never developed malaria, HIV viral load was generally unchanged. The affect on HIV viral load increased with the severity of malaria. In 24 patients with fever and high parasitaemia, the mean increase in viral load was 0.51 log (0.29 to 0.73), p = <0o0001. Another finding was that viral load elevations were most marked in patients with CD4 cell counts above 300; and this was true using each definition of malaria. In the thirteen patients with fever and high parasitaemia, the mean increase in viral load was 0.81 log. In this subset of patients, viral load also remained elevated 0.23 log above baseline after malaria treatment. Although this finding was not statistically significant, the researchers suggested that it was likely to become so in a larger study. Many other concurrent infections have been shown increase HIV viral load, usually indirectly via inflammatory immune responses that in turn stimulate HIV replication. The Malawi study authors suggest that the more modest increase in viral load among people with lower CD4 counts is likely due to the weaker immune responses to malaria in these patients.
Implications The Malawi study researchers believe their results suggest "malaria, especially if frequent, unrecognised, inadequately treated, or untreated, might lead to sufficient elevation of viral loads in HIV-infected adults to result in increased rates of HIV transmission and disease progression." Although viral load increases may appear small, "both infections are of such great public-health importance in tropical countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, that any potential interaction should make us worry," according to Drs. James Whitworth and Kirsten A Hewitt of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who authored a Lancet commentary accompanying the study. "Given the number of cases of HIV and malaria, even small increases in relative risks of HIV transmission and progression are important."
The Malawi researchers note that population-based studies show no great increase in the rate of HIV disease progression in areas of the world with malaria. However, this author must point out, there are far too many intervening variables, including subtype of HIV, which could affect such analyses. The only valid comparisons would be within the same population - which this study does. Also, even though the increase in HIV load is reversible with prompt and effective treatment for malaria, outside of clinical studies, parasitaemia without symptoms is likely to go undetected and untreated. And without prompt malaria treatment or with treatment failure, increase in viral load might be sustained for longer periods. The researchers conclude that "these observations highlight the importance of coordinated efforts to prevent HIV and malaria in areas where both diseases are endemic." Finally, "antimalarial measures might be important for HIV-infected people who are not yet eligible for antiretroviral therapy."
Alex - 18 Feb 2005 03:24 GMT Malaria is one of the causes of positive HIV tests.
> Malaria Increases HIV Viral Load > AIDSmap.org (1/19/05) Smart T [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > researchers published in the January 15 issue of The Lancet (365:9455, > p. 233, 2005).
> The Malawi researchers note that population-based studies show no > great increase in the rate of HIV disease progression in areas of the > world with malaria. Which could indicate that many of the positive tests are caused by malaria infection, not HIV infection.
> However, this author must point out, there are far > too many intervening variables, including subtype of HIV, which could > affect such analyses. The only valid comparisons would be within the > same population - which this study does.
> Also, even though the increase in HIV load is reversible with prompt > and effective treatment for malaria, ???
> outside of clinical studies, parasitaemia without > symptoms is likely to go undetected and untreated. And without prompt [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Finally, "antimalarial measures might be important for HIV-infected > people who are not yet eligible for antiretroviral therapy." A subtle or not so subtle hint for increasing malaria treatment?
Alex
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 18 Feb 2005 06:57 GMT >Malaria is one of the causes of positive HIV tests. <http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1108495014.256373.33830%40g14g2000cwa.googl egroups.com>
 Signature David Canzi
GMCarter - 18 Feb 2005 11:40 GMT >Malaria is one of the causes of positive HIV tests. Irrelevant. Sometimes people with HIV will have a false negative serology for certain parasitic infections. It cuts both ways.
Does that mean the parasites don't exist? Or that infection with HIV results in depressed expression of anti-parasite antibodies and thus a false negative test? In which case, HIV exists and suppresses the immune system.
That malaria may cause some small handful of false HIV+ tests does not obviate the tests, the fact that HIV exists nor the reality of its involvement in the development of AIDS.
George M. Carter
** Bruschi F, Castagna B. [The serodiagnosis of parasitic infections] [Article in Italian] Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):141-4.
Dipartimento di Patologia Sperimentale, Biotecnologie Mediche, Infettivologia ed Epidemiologia, Universita degli Studi di Pisa e U.O. di Microbiologia Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa.
Recently, the term of clinical immunoparasitology has been coined to indicate the application of immunological methods to the laboratory diagnosis of parasitic infections. In particular, serological diagnosis (indirect diagnosis) is useful especially in the cases of toxocarosis, trichinellosis, echinococcosis, cysticercosis, toxoplasmosis, amoebic abscess, some filariasis, visceral leishmaniasis, schistosomiasis. When possible, for infections caused by protozoa or helminths, the "gold standard" is represented by direct diagnosis performed by microscopic and/or macroscopic observation of the parasite. In any case, immunological results must be interpreted in consideration of the clinical picture of the patient and confirmed possibly by finding the parasite or its genome, even using molecular methods. Furthermore, since the presence of specific antibodies can reveal an acquired infection, but not necessarily a disease, it is particularly helpful, in addition to a qualitative evaluation, a quantitative one, by determining the serum antibody titre. After recovery, the antibody levels decrease, however, they may persist for long periods, for this reason they do not help in evaluating the treatment outcome. Interpretation of serological results may be difficult when the patients originate from areas where the suspected infection is endemic, in that case, a serum positivity could reflect an old exposition to the parasite, therefore it is not related to the present clinical status. Furthermore, serology may frequently result falsely negative in not immunocompetent subjects (organ transplanted, HIV positive individuals, premature babies, diabetics). Clinicians can interpret correctly the serological results only if the Parasitology laboratory inform them about the significant diagnostic values, the sensitivity and the specificity of the test in use. At present time, many diagnostic kits for immunoparasitology are commercially available, and industries are developing newer and newer ones (which are not always validated). In relation to this aspect, it should be helpful, for each of parasitic infection, to establish reference centers, not only to control the quality of commercial kits, but also as a reference point to those laboratories which use "in house" kits. To this regard, the recent establishment of a European Centre for Control of Infectious Diseases will help. The antigen characteristics (crude, E/S, recombinant, synthetic) for assays searching for antibodies (IHA, IFA, EIA, WB) of different classes, the controls to choose for these assays, the specimen requirements will be discussed. The recent findings on the serological diagnosis of intestinal protozoa infections, malaria, leishmaniasis, echinococcosis, cysticercosis, trichinellosis, toxocariasis, schistosomiasis, strongyloidiasis will be presented.
** Fabiani M, Accorsi S, Aleni R, Rizzardini G, Nattabi B, Gabrielli A, Opira C, Declich S. Estimating HIV prevalence and the impact of HIV/AIDS on a Ugandan hospital by combining serosurvey data and hospital discharge records. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003 Sep 1;34(1):62-6.
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the disease-specific HIV prevalence in a northern Ugandan hospital and to evaluate the impact of HIV/AIDS on hospital services. DESIGN: HIV serosurvey and analysis of routinely compiled hospital records. METHODS: The serosurvey was conducted among all 352 patients admitted to the medical ward of the Lacor Hospital in March 1999 (this ward consists of 3 units: general medicine, tuberculosis, and cancer). The impact on hospital services was estimated using the hospital discharge records for all 3447 patients admitted in 1999, in combination with serosurvey data, and was expressed as the percentage of bed-days attributable to HIV-positive patients. RESULTS: The overall HIV prevalence was 42.0% (52.6, 44.6, and 13.2% in the general medicine, tuberculosis, and cancer units, respectively). The disease-specific prevalence ranged from 45-65% for patients with tuberculosis, pneumonia, malaria, and enteritis. HIV-positive patients, compared with HIV-negative patients, had a higher in-hospital mortality (14.6 vs. 3.0%) and a lower average length of stay (41.4 vs. 48.9 days). AIDS cases accounted for 5.0% of hospital admissions, 4.1% of bed-days, and 11.5% of deaths. When considering all HIV-positive patients, these accounted for 37.2% of the bed-days. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of disease-specific HIV prevalence and of the patterns of HIV-related diseases is crucial for early case management. The impact of HIV-positive patients on hospital services is quite high, accounting for >1/3 of the bed-days in 1999. Providing a continuum of care through inpatient, outpatient, and outreach home care services probably represents the only means of relieving the pressure on overloaded hospitals.
**
|
|
|