Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Malaria and HIV

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
GMCarter - 17 Feb 2005 13:49 GMT
Malaria Increases HIV Viral Load
AIDSmap.org (1/19/05) Smart T

Acute malaria episodes are associated with a marked increase in HIV
viral load, according to a study by a team of Malawian and American
researchers published in the January 15 issue of The Lancet (365:9455,
p. 233, 2005). Although the increase in HIV viral load resolves with
effective anti-malarial treatment, the study researchers propose that
malaria episodes could facilitate HIV transmission and accelerate
disease progression - especially if the parasite burden is high and
accompanied by fever.

Malaria the coinfection
Malaria is a disease caused by several species of Plasmodium, a
parasite that can be transmitted by mosquito bites, primarily in
tropical regions of the world. Over 300 million people contract
malaria each year; one million of them die. Most of the fatalities are
children. In the areas of highest risk, exposure to the malaria
parasite is so persistent that children develop a functional immunity
to the parasite by the age of five - or else they simply don't
survive. Immune' adults are still bitten and can be infected by the
parasite, however the parasite burden is lower and with few or no
symptoms.

Approximately 90% of the malaria cases occur in sub-Saharan Africa
where the burden of HIV is also high. Yet, while malaria is one of the
most important diseases in the world, its role as an HIV coinfection
has perhaps been under-appreciated. Recent studies have shown that the
two diseases can have a number of harmful interactions. For example,
pregnant women with HIV are at a greatly increased risk of malaria -
even if they were previously immune to the organism. HIV also
increases the risk of malaria crossing the placenta and affecting the
foetus. Conversely, the risk of HIV transmission to the child is
increased when there is placental malaria.

Other studies in the regions suggest an increased risk of symptomatic
malaria among people with AIDS. There are indications that adults may
gradually lose malaria immunity as their immune system weakens. Also,
malaria diagnosis is often made using simple clinical criteria - fever
- that can be mimicked or masked by HIV/AIDS and its opportunistic
infections. However, the effect of malaria on the course of HIV
infection has not been as well characterised, and initial reports of
any interaction have been inconclusive. While an earlier study in
Malawi found higher HIV loads in patients with malaria than those
without, the difference could not be clearly attributed to malaria,
since the patient's viral loads before illness were unknown.

Study in Malawi
For this prospectively designed study, researchers recruited 334 HIV
positive adults who were free of malaria parasites at the start of the
study. The plan was to monitor these patients closely for acute
episodes of malaria using four definitions: parasitaemia (any
detectable parasite in the blood), parasite density above 2000/ L,
parasitaemia with fever, and parasite density above 2000/ l and fever.
Viral loads were measured at baseline, during malaria and after
anti-malarial treatment (when possible). Patients were also stratified
depending upon baseline CD4 cell counts above 300 and 300 and below.
Baseline characteristics, such as age, sex, and employment status,
were similar across strata. During follow-up, 148 patients had at
least one malaria episode and received antimalarial treatment. Of
these 77 had viral load measurements at all three key timepoints. In
these patients, the median baseline viral load was 96,215 copies/ml.

When malaria was defined simply as parasitaemia, episodes were found
to transiently increase viral load by 0.25 log (95% CI 0.11-0.39, p =
0.0003 within this stratum). About 8-9 weeks after treatment for
malaria, the patient's viral loads returned to levels similar to those
at baseline. In a control group of 23 patients who never developed
malaria, HIV viral load was generally unchanged. The affect on HIV
viral load increased with the severity of malaria. In 24 patients with
fever and high parasitaemia, the mean increase in viral load was 0.51
log (0.29 to 0.73), p = <0o0001. Another finding was that viral load
elevations were most marked in patients with CD4 cell counts above
300; and this was true using each definition of malaria. In the
thirteen patients with fever and high parasitaemia, the mean increase
in viral load was 0.81 log. In this subset of patients, viral load
also remained elevated 0.23 log above baseline after malaria
treatment. Although this finding was not statistically significant,
the researchers suggested that it was likely to become so in a larger
study. Many other concurrent infections have been shown increase HIV
viral load, usually indirectly via inflammatory immune responses that
in turn stimulate HIV replication. The Malawi study authors suggest
that the more modest increase in viral load among people with lower
CD4 counts is likely due to the weaker immune responses to malaria in
these patients.

Implications
The Malawi study researchers believe their results suggest "malaria,
especially if frequent, unrecognised, inadequately treated, or
untreated, might lead to sufficient elevation of viral loads in
HIV-infected adults to result in increased rates of HIV transmission
and disease progression." Although viral load increases may appear
small, "both infections are of such great public-health importance in
tropical countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, that any
potential interaction should make us worry," according to Drs. James
Whitworth and Kirsten A Hewitt of the London School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine, who authored a Lancet commentary accompanying the
study. "Given the number of cases of HIV and malaria, even small
increases in relative risks of HIV transmission and progression are
important."

The Malawi researchers note that population-based studies show no
great increase in the rate of HIV disease progression in areas of the
world with malaria. However, this author must point out, there are far
too many intervening variables, including subtype of HIV, which could
affect such analyses. The only valid comparisons would be within the
same population - which this study does. Also, even though the
increase in HIV load is reversible with prompt and effective treatment
for malaria, outside of clinical studies, parasitaemia without
symptoms is likely to go undetected and untreated. And without prompt
malaria treatment or with treatment failure, increase in viral load
might be sustained for longer periods. The researchers conclude that
"these observations highlight the importance of coordinated efforts to
prevent HIV and malaria in areas where both diseases are endemic."
Finally, "antimalarial measures might be important for HIV-infected
people who are not yet eligible for antiretroviral therapy."
Alex - 18 Feb 2005 03:24 GMT
Malaria is one of the causes of positive HIV tests.

> Malaria Increases HIV Viral Load
> AIDSmap.org (1/19/05) Smart T
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> researchers published in the January 15 issue of The Lancet (365:9455,
> p. 233, 2005).

> The Malawi researchers note that population-based studies show no
> great increase in the rate of HIV disease progression in areas of the
> world with malaria.

Which could indicate that many of the positive tests
are caused by malaria infection, not HIV infection.

> However, this author must point out, there are far
> too many intervening variables, including subtype of HIV, which could
> affect such analyses. The only valid comparisons would be within the
> same population - which this study does.

> Also, even though the increase in HIV load is reversible with prompt
> and effective treatment for malaria,

???

> outside of clinical studies, parasitaemia without
> symptoms is likely to go undetected and untreated. And without prompt
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Finally, "antimalarial measures might be important for HIV-infected
> people who are not yet eligible for antiretroviral therapy."

A subtle or not so subtle hint for increasing malaria treatment?

Alex
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 18 Feb 2005 06:57 GMT
>Malaria is one of the causes of positive HIV tests.

<http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1108495014.256373.33830%40g14g2000cwa.googl
egroups.com
>

Signature

David Canzi

GMCarter - 18 Feb 2005 11:40 GMT
>Malaria is one of the causes of positive HIV tests.

Irrelevant. Sometimes people with HIV will have a false negative
serology for certain parasitic infections. It cuts both ways.

Does that mean the parasites don't exist? Or that infection with HIV
results in depressed expression of anti-parasite antibodies and thus a
false negative test? In which case, HIV exists and suppresses the
immune system.

That malaria may cause some small handful of false HIV+ tests does not
obviate the tests, the fact that HIV exists nor the reality of its
involvement in the development of AIDS.

        George M. Carter

**
Bruschi F, Castagna B. [The serodiagnosis of parasitic infections]
[Article in Italian] Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):141-4.

   Dipartimento di Patologia Sperimentale, Biotecnologie Mediche,
Infettivologia ed Epidemiologia, Universita degli Studi di Pisa e U.O.
di Microbiologia Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria
Pisana, Pisa.

   Recently, the term of clinical immunoparasitology has been coined
to indicate the application of immunological methods to the laboratory
diagnosis of parasitic infections. In particular, serological
diagnosis (indirect diagnosis) is useful especially in the cases of
toxocarosis, trichinellosis, echinococcosis, cysticercosis,
toxoplasmosis, amoebic abscess, some filariasis, visceral
leishmaniasis, schistosomiasis. When possible, for infections caused
by protozoa or helminths, the "gold standard" is represented by direct
diagnosis performed by microscopic and/or macroscopic observation of
the parasite. In any case, immunological results must be interpreted
in consideration of the clinical picture of the patient and confirmed
possibly by finding the parasite or its genome, even using molecular
methods. Furthermore, since the presence of specific antibodies can
reveal an acquired infection, but not necessarily a disease, it is
particularly helpful, in addition to a qualitative evaluation, a
quantitative one, by determining the serum antibody titre. After
recovery, the antibody levels decrease, however, they may persist for
long periods, for this reason they do not help in evaluating the
treatment outcome. Interpretation of serological results may be
difficult when the patients originate from areas where the suspected
infection is endemic, in that case, a serum positivity could reflect
an old exposition to the parasite, therefore it is not related to the
present clinical status. Furthermore, serology may frequently result
falsely negative in not immunocompetent subjects (organ transplanted,
HIV positive individuals, premature babies, diabetics). Clinicians can
interpret correctly the serological results only if the Parasitology
laboratory inform them about the significant diagnostic values, the
sensitivity and the specificity of the test in use. At present time,
many diagnostic kits for immunoparasitology are commercially
available, and industries are developing newer and newer ones (which
are not always validated). In relation to this aspect, it should be
helpful, for each of parasitic infection, to establish reference
centers, not only to control the quality of commercial kits, but also
as a reference point to those laboratories which use "in house" kits.
To this regard, the recent establishment of a European Centre for
Control of Infectious Diseases will help. The antigen characteristics
(crude, E/S, recombinant, synthetic) for assays searching for
antibodies (IHA, IFA, EIA, WB) of different classes, the controls to
choose for these assays, the specimen requirements will be discussed.
The recent findings on the serological diagnosis of intestinal
protozoa infections, malaria, leishmaniasis, echinococcosis,
cysticercosis, trichinellosis, toxocariasis, schistosomiasis,
strongyloidiasis will be presented.

**
Fabiani M, Accorsi S, Aleni R, Rizzardini G, Nattabi B, Gabrielli A,
Opira C, Declich S. Estimating HIV prevalence and the impact of
HIV/AIDS on a Ugandan hospital by combining serosurvey data and
hospital discharge records. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003 Sep
1;34(1):62-6.

   Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Istituto Superiore
di Sanita, Rome, Italy.

   OBJECTIVE: To estimate the disease-specific HIV prevalence in a
northern Ugandan hospital and to evaluate the impact of HIV/AIDS on
hospital services. DESIGN: HIV serosurvey and analysis of routinely
compiled hospital records. METHODS: The serosurvey was conducted among
all 352 patients admitted to the medical ward of the Lacor Hospital in
March 1999 (this ward consists of 3 units: general medicine,
tuberculosis, and cancer). The impact on hospital services was
estimated using the hospital discharge records for all 3447 patients
admitted in 1999, in combination with serosurvey data, and was
expressed as the percentage of bed-days attributable to HIV-positive
patients. RESULTS: The overall HIV prevalence was 42.0% (52.6, 44.6,
and 13.2% in the general medicine, tuberculosis, and cancer units,
respectively). The disease-specific prevalence ranged from 45-65% for
patients with tuberculosis, pneumonia, malaria, and enteritis.
HIV-positive patients, compared with HIV-negative patients, had a
higher in-hospital mortality (14.6 vs. 3.0%) and a lower average
length of stay (41.4 vs. 48.9 days). AIDS cases accounted for 5.0% of
hospital admissions, 4.1% of bed-days, and 11.5% of deaths. When
considering all HIV-positive patients, these accounted for 37.2% of
the bed-days. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of disease-specific HIV
prevalence and of the patterns of HIV-related diseases is crucial for
early case management. The impact of HIV-positive patients on hospital
services is quite high, accounting for >1/3 of the bed-days in 1999.
Providing a continuum of care through inpatient, outpatient, and
outreach home care services probably represents the only means of
relieving the pressure on overloaded hospitals.

**
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.