 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / February 2005Millions of false tests
One machine performed 8,400 tests a week and it is estimated that 10% to 15% "were inaccurate". Adaltis has installed more than 2,500 of these Labotech machines, which can perform up to eight blood tests simultaneously, according to the company's Web site. 2,500 x 8,400 divided by 15% (faulty tests) = Up to 3,150,000 faulty tests a week ____________ Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said a congressional hearing will be held in May to look into the equipment and its use. "Every patient that took their test there — their trust was completely betrayed," said Turner, who now lives in a Southeastern state that she declined to identify. "People should be able to trust that when they go somewhere, they are going to get the right results." > One machine performed 8,400 tests a week and it is estimated that 10% to > 15% "were inaccurate". [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > 2,500 x 8,400 divided by 15% (faulty tests) = > Up to 3,150,000 faulty tests a week I would suggest you recalculate your figures and come back with a more realistic number. My figure is correct based on the information. The figure, however, assumes a 100% usage which never really happens. That is why i wrote 'up to'. > One machine performed 8,400 tests a week and it is estimated that 10% to > 15% "were inaccurate". > > Adaltis has installed more than 2,500 of these Labotech machines, which > can perform up to eight blood tests simultaneously, according to the > company's Web site. However the news reports we very clear that it was only the one machine at one particular lab that had the problem not every machine the company had ever manufactured Mark. So the problem was limited to the 10% or 15% of the 8,400 tests performed by that single machine that was experiencing this error rate. Further reporting on the issue has confirmed this and that all 8,400 effected patients have been contacted and retested to ascertain there HIV status. Again Mark/Paul misrepresents the facts of the case to further his own sick agenda which is to encourage and benefit financially by convincing people that unsafe sex is a human right and that it poses no health risks. This also explain his propaganda campaign against condoms calling them a cancer causing, immune system destroying plot by the governments and corporations of the world to deny his rights to bareback f.ck anyone he wants to. Let's just pray Mark/Paul is not HIV positive or he might end up being prosecuted in one of the 20 odd states that make knowingly engaging in unprotected sex with out divulging your HIV status a felony. A few of those states even treat the crime as aggravated assault with intent to cause grave bodily harm and or death and have very long sentences. It might even be considered a public health service to send copies of some of Mark/Paul's posts to his local health department so they are aware of his claims of thousands of unprotected partners. Through contact tracing they might just find out that he is the missing nexus in an HIV contact tracing effort in there jurisdiction. Gary Stein >> One machine performed 8,400 tests a week and it is estimated that 10% to >> 15% "were inaccurate". [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >8,400 tests performed by that single machine that was experiencing this >error rate. Yes, indeed. He regurgitated this story some time ago and the same information was provided showing that he is making extrapolations based on a deception. In short, he is a consistent liar. If rather pathetic. George M. Carter " based on a deception" What deception you lier? Pathetic But I have posted other reports of similar machine failures. >But I have posted other reports of similar machine failures. Provide the URL for one such report posted by you in misc.health.aids. I say you can't, because there is no such article.  SignatureDavid Canzi >One machine performed 8,400 tests a week and it is estimated that 10% to >15% "were inaccurate". [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >declined to identify. "People should be able to trust that when they go >somewhere, they are going to get the right results." http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=crhpbm%243fr%241%40rumours.uwaterloo.ca "The first time you posted this it could, conceivably, have been a mistake. Once it has been shown wrong, every repost is a lie." SignatureDavid Canzi |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.