Feb 9

By LINDA A. JOHNSON

Urging a major shift in U.S. policy, some health experts are recommending
that virtually all Americans be tested routinely for the AIDS virus, much as
they are for cancer and other diseases.

Since the early years of the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s, the government has
recommended screening only in big cities, where AIDS rates are high, and
among members of high-risk groups, such as gay men and drug addicts.

But two large, federally funded studies found that the cost of routinely
testing and treating nearly all adults would be outweighed by a reduction in
new infections and the opportunity to start patients on drug cocktails
early, when they work best.

"Given the availability of effective therapy and preventive measures, it is
possible to improve care and perhaps influence the course of the epidemic
through widespread, effective and cost-effective screening," Dr. Samuel A.
Bozzette wrote in an editorial accompanying the studies, which appear in
Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.

A failure to institute such screening at doctors' offices and clinics would
be "a critical disservice" to patients with the AIDS virus and "the future
health of the nation," wrote Bozzette, who is from the University of
California at San Diego and the Rand Corp. think tank in Santa Monica,
Calif.

Dr. Robert Janssen, director of HIV-AIDS prevention at the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, said the CDC will re-evaluate its guidelines
over the next two years, and will consider the study's findings as well as
the availability of new, rapid HIV tests that produce results in a half-hour
instead of the usual week or two.

Who would bear the cost of expanded testing - and the cost of the treatment,
which runs to at least $15,000 a year - remains a sticky question amid
government cutbacks in health-care funding. However, Janssen said the
studies' findings could lead to some private insurers to encourage more HIV
testing.

One of the studies, by researchers at Duke and Stanford universities and the
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, estimated that routine
one-time testing of everyone would cut new infections each year by just over
20 percent, and that every HIV-infected patient identified would gain an
average of 1 1/2 years of life.

The other study, by Yale and Harvard researchers, found that testing people
every three to five years would be cost-effective for all but the
lowest-risk people, such as those who are celibate or are in monogamous
heterosexual relationships. And even for those people, one-time testing was
found to be cost-effective.

Nationwide, about 40,000 new HIV infections occur each year. An estimated
950,000 people are infected with the virus, but about 280,000 of them don't
know it.

CDC guidelines recommend routine tests wherever the prevalence of HIV
infection is more than 1 percent - basically, cities and some densely
populated suburbs.

"If you need proof of the fact that it's not working, look at all the people
who have slipped through the cracks - 280,000," said A. David Paltiel of the
Yale School of Medicine's division of health policy, lead author of the
second study.

The VA-funded study found that in areas where about 1 in 100 patients has
undiagnosed HIV - what the CDC calls high-risk settings - widespread testing
would cost about $15,100 for each year of good health gained by people
diagnosed with the virus, counting the benefits to their sexual partners.

Even in areas with an undiagnosed HIV infection rate of only 1 in 2,000- the
rate in the general population - each healthy year gained by newly diagnosed
HIV patients and their partners would still cost less than $50,000. That is
the threshold at which health economists generally consider treatments to be
cost-effective.

Paltiel noted the two groups of researchers had very similar cost-benefit
results, even though they used different computer models.

"The cost-benefit to individuals and society is worth" widespread screening,
said Dr. Lawrence Deyton, chief of public health in the Department of
Veterans Affairs, which provides medical care to about 5 million veterans.

In light of the findings, he said the VA is going to urge more patients to
get tested.

"We're going to take the ball and run with it," Deyton said.