Cocaine may hasten disease progression. The first study below isn't
comparing to HIV-negative but there is no reason to believe that it
causes CD4 counts to decline. Just that they may faster with chronic
use associated with HIV disease.
Obviously, not everyone with HIV is using cocaine. And not everyone
with a drug habit has HIV.
George M. Carter
**
Larrat EP, Zierler S, Mayer K. Cocaine use and HIV disease
progression among heterosexuals. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1996
Jul;5(4):229-36.
Department of Community Health, Brown University, School of Medicine,
USA.
Evidence derived fromin vitro experiments would suggest that
cocaine exposure may hasten the progression of HIV disease among
infected individuals. Epidemiologic support for this association is
equivocal at best. We examined the relationship between cocaine use
and decline in CD4 cell counts over a 6-month period in a cohort of 81
heterosexually active men and women who were infected with HIV.
Overall, cocaine users were 1.4 times (90% CI=1.0-2.1) more likely to
experience a decline in CD4 count than were non-cocaine users. Cocaine
users with a baseline CD4 count of greater than 500 cells/mm(3) were
at 1.6 times (90% CI=1.2-2.3) greater risk for a CD4 decline than
non-cocaine users at this baseline CD4 level. Concurrent treatment
with an antiretroviral agent [AZT] modified the strength of this
association, as evidenced by a cumulative incidence ratio (CIR) of 0.4
(90% CI=0.1-1.3) among AZT users and a CIR=2.2 (90% CI=1.5-3.2) among
those not undergoing AZT treatment. The results of this study raise
concerns about the negative effects of cocaine on people living with
HIV infection, particularly those not receiving antiretroviral therapy
who entered our study with a relatively intact immune system.
**
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003 Aug 1;33(4):500-5. Related
Articles, Links
Click here to read
Drug use patterns over time among HIV-seropositive and
HIV-seronegative women: the HER study experience.
Macalino GE, Ko H, Celentano DD, Hogan JW, Schoenbaum EE, Schuman
P, Rich JD; HER Study Group.
Brown University Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island 02912,
USA. Grace_Macalino@Brown.edu
BACKGROUND: Drug use, particularly among women, is a public health
issue given its health effects and its impact on HIV transmission.
Becoming HIV seropositive could lead to differing patterns of drug use
over time. HIV infection may decrease drug use due to an increased
access to health services. Alternatively, increased drug use may occur
due to depression associated with being HIV infected, leading to
despair, hopelessness, and a lack of motivation to become drug free.
METHODS: We evaluated the potential association between HIV serostatus
and drug use among a cohort of 1310 women who were part of a
multicenter collaborative study on the natural history of HIV
infection. Eight hundred seventy-one HIV-seropositive women and 439
HIV-seronegative women were enrolled at four sites (New York,
Providence, Baltimore, and Detroit). We defined drug use as any heroin
or cocaine use reported at the baseline visit (enrollment). RESULTS:
Drug use was found to decrease during earlier visits (months 1-24) and
remained stable at 20% thereafter (months 30-84). No significant
differences in change of drug use were noted by HIV serostatus, using
generalized estimating equation-based logistic regression analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: HIV-seropositive status did not affect drug use patterns
over time within our population of high-risk women.
**
Herning RI, Tate K, Better W, Cadet JL. Cerebral blood flow
pulsatility deficits in HIV+ poly substance abusers: differences
associated with antiviral medications. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002 Jan
1;65(2):129-35.
Molecular Neuropsychiatry Section, Division of Intramural Research,
National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, PO
Box 5180, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. rherning@intra.nida.nih.gov
This study examines the influence of HIV-seropositivity and
antiviral medications on cerebral blood flow in cocaine abusers.
Forty-five HIV negative (HIV-) cocaine abusers, 36 HIV positive (HIV+)
cocaine abusers (CD4; mean 378, +/-229) and 27 control HIV- subjects
were studied. Blood flow velocity and pulsatility were determined for
the anterior and middle cerebral arteries using transcranial Doppler
sonography (TCD). Psychological assessments, which included the
psychiatric symptom checklist (SCL-90R), hopelessness (Beck) and
well-being (Ellison) questionnaires revealed greater psychiatric
distress in HIV+ cocaine abusers than the other groups. HIV- cocaine
abusers and HIV+ cocaine abusers not receiving antiviral medications
(n=25 of 36) had elevated pulsatility values, indicating increased
resistance in the cerebral blood vessels in comparison to control
subjects. HIV+ cocaine abusers using antiviral medications (n=11 of
36) had pulsatility values similar to HIV- control subjects.
Interestingly, there was no significant relationship between intensity
of psychiatric distress reported by HIV+ cocaine abusers and perfusion
deficits. Our findings suggest that unmedicated HIV+ cocaine abusers
have cerebrovascular deficits, which are similar to HIV- cocaine
abusers. In addition, the use of antiviral medications appears to be
associated with a reduction of these deficits in HIV+ cocaine abusers.
Nevertheless, more studies will be needed before any conclusion can be
reached regarding possible beneficial effects of these agents on the
cerebral vasculature.
**
Wang GJ, Chang L, Volkow ND, Telang F, Logan J, Ernst T, Fowler JS.
Decreased brain dopaminergic transporters in HIV-associated dementia
patients. Brain. 2004 Nov;127(Pt 11):2452-8. Epub 2004 Aug 19.
Medical and Chemistry Departments, Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Upton, NY, USA.
HIV has a propensity to invade subcortical regions of the brain,
which may lead to a subcortical dementia termed HIV-cognitive motor
complex. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether dopamine (DA) D2
receptors and transporters (DAT) are affected in the basal ganglia of
subjects with HIV, and how these changes relate to dementia status.
Fifteen HIV subjects (age 44.5 +/- 11 years; CD4 185 +/- 130/mm3)) and
13 seronegative controls (42 +/- 12 years) were evaluated with PET to
assess availability of DAT ([11C]cocaine) and DA D2 receptor
([11C]raclopride). HIV patients with associated dementia (HAD), but
not those without dementia (ND) had significantly lower DAT
availability in putamen (-19.3%, P = 0.009) and ventral striatum
(-13.6%, P = 0.03) compared with seronegative controls. Higher plasma
viral load in the HIV dementia patients correlated with lower DAT in
the caudate (r = -0.7, P = 0.02) and putamen (r = -0.69, P = 0.03). DA
D2 receptor availability, however, showed mild and non-significant
decreases in HIV patients. These results provide the first evidence of
DA terminal injury in HIV dementia patients, and suggest that
decreased DAT may contribute to the pathogenesis of HIV dementia. The
greater DAT decrease in the putamen than in the caudate parallels that
observed in Parkinson's disease. The inverse relationship between
viral burden and DAT availability further supports HIV-mediated
neurotoxicity to dopaminergic terminals.
john - 08 Feb 2005 16:47 GMT
yes, that figures, but I wonder if it is faster than AIDS drugs
> Cocaine may hasten disease progression. The first study below isn't
> comparing to HIV-negative but there is no reason to believe that it
[quoted text clipped - 132 lines]
> viral burden and DAT availability further supports HIV-mediated
> neurotoxicity to dopaminergic terminals.
GMCarter - 09 Feb 2005 10:25 GMT
>yes, that figures, but I wonder if it is faster than AIDS drugs
Yes. Indeed, antiviral use tends to offset the cognitive deficits, for
example.
George M. Carter
PaulKing - 08 Feb 2005 21:21 GMT
"Cocaine may hasten disease progression."
Or cause immune suppression in the first place, as Duesberg said a long
time ago.
Gary Stein - 08 Feb 2005 23:17 GMT
> "Cocaine may hasten disease progression."
>
> Or cause immune suppression in the first place, as Duesberg said a long
> time ago.
With out ever explaining the tens of thousands of AID's patients who have
never used any of the recreational drugs he cited in that ancient paper.
That horse died years ago I don't think even Duesburg is still beating that
old drum.
Gary Stein
PaulKing - 09 Feb 2005 09:23 GMT
Immune suppression has hundreds of causes but only a fool would claim that
drugs are not among them.
Immune suppression was common in IV drugs users long, long before the
whole 'AIDS' thing and is still so now (but now renamed 'AIDS').
To say that the old causes (the drugs themselves) suddenly had no harmful
effect anylonger and 'HIV' exclusivly took over that role, is insane.
As I am sure you will claim this is the case your mental condition can be
so deduced.
GMCarter - 09 Feb 2005 10:26 GMT
>Immune suppression has hundreds of causes but only a fool would claim that
>drugs are not among them.
Disingenuous fatuous nonsense. Lots of things cause "immune
suppression" which is a vague, meaningless terms, especially in your
hands, Mark.
George M. Carter
Gary Stein - 09 Feb 2005 23:23 GMT
Yes Paul/Mark drugs to cause some damage to the human immune system, no they
do not cause a ongoing steady drop to 0 in CD4 + T-Cells.
If they did AID's would have been a problem for centuries due to Opium use
in the far past. Funny thing is that prior to HIV there were no patients who
showed the unique symptom of AIDS which is the steady decline to 0 of CD4 +
T-Cells or death which ever comes first.
Also drug users once they stop using see complete restoration of there
immune function that has not been seen in HIV + patients who are not taking
anti-viral medications.
Gary Stein
> Immune suppression has hundreds of causes but only a fool would claim that
> drugs are not among them.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> As I am sure you will claim this is the case your mental condition can be
> so deduced.
PaulKing - 10 Feb 2005 00:09 GMT
"If they did AID's would have been a problem for centuries due to Opium
use"
It was, just not called 'AIDS'.
GMCarter - 10 Feb 2005 12:31 GMT
>"If they did AID's would have been a problem for centuries due to Opium
>use"
>
>It was, just not called 'AIDS'.
LOL. Bullshit. Shows what you know about opium use. Or heroin. Or just
about anything, apparently.
GMCarter - 09 Feb 2005 10:25 GMT
>"Cocaine may hasten disease progression."
>
>Or cause immune suppression in the first place, as Duesberg said a long
>time ago.
Not CD4 declining to zero. Even after people stop.
Cocaine is NOT the cause of AIDS.
PaulKing - 10 Feb 2005 00:10 GMT
"Cocaine is NOT the cause of AIDS."
Not THE cause, but one of many contributing factors.
GMCarter - 10 Feb 2005 12:31 GMT
>"Cocaine is NOT the cause of AIDS."
>
>Not THE cause, but one of many contributing factors.
Actually, yes. The proximate CAUSE is HIV. Cocaine users who do NOT
have HIV do not develop AIDS.
john - 09 Feb 2005 21:36 GMT
the pharma boys have a similar drug called Ritalin, which they are giving to
a few million kids
> Cocaine may hasten disease progression. The first study below isn't
> comparing to HIV-negative but there is no reason to believe that it
[quoted text clipped - 132 lines]
> viral burden and DAT availability further supports HIV-mediated
> neurotoxicity to dopaminergic terminals.