>... the FDA said, 41 of 204
>sample batches of condoms were "violative" of minimum government
>standards. ... A total of almost 51,000 condoms was tested, and a
>batch failed if four or more condoms in it leaked.
51000 condoms/204 batches = 250 condoms/batch. So 4/250 (1/60th)
or more condoms failed in 1/5th of the batches, and 3/250 (1/80th)
or less failed in the other 4/5ths of the batches.
Your subject line "20% of all condoms faulty - FDA" is so far from
being justified it must be considered not just dishonest, but
profoundly dishonest.

Signature
David Canzi
GMCarter - 24 Jan 2005 22:50 GMT
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:14:01 +0000 (UTC),
dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi -- non-mailable address)
wrote:
snip...>
>Your subject line "20% of all condoms faulty - FDA" is so far from
>being justified it must be considered not just dishonest, but
>profoundly dishonest.
Why David, it almost sounds like yer callin him a "lier"!
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 29 Jan 2005 19:16 GMT
>On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:14:01 +0000 (UTC),
>dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi -- non-mailable address)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Why David, it almost sounds like yer callin him a "lier"!
Yeah. One difference between him and me is this: When I call him a
liar, I make the accusation more convincing by showing the evidence.
When he calls me a lier, he makes the accusation more convincing BY
TYPING IT ALL IN CAPS.

Signature
David Canzi