>With a failure rate of betwwen 35% and 100% (Mariposa Study) and massive
>toxic effects that can be lethal, condoms are just plain bad news.
Then don't have sex. LOL. You sound like a Vatican supporter on this
issue.
In any case, that ancient Mariposa study is flawed in its
interpretation which you cling to despite evidence to the contrary. It
is truly quixotic that denialists will assert as incontrovertible fact
vague and insubstantial theories to explain away HIV and justify
rotten behavior while ignoring the mountains of data that simply
refute their nonsense. In this case, see, e.g.,
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/ANS00532.html
One of the important comments to be made is that people should use
fresh condoms.
>'AIDS' is NOT an std.
HIV IS an STD. It causes AIDS.
>See the articles and CIA Factbook figures for
>Holland and the Phillipines (500,000 prostitutes) and see how you can
>justlfy tyhe std idea in face of such conclusive evidence.
Those data are not in the slightest conclusive (let alone trustworthy
coming from you). Look at the rate among sex workers in Mumbai versus
Kolkata. Look at the rates among other populations.
It varies.
>Let's end this absurd scare myth and get back to an enlightened attutude
>to sex.
An enlightened attitude toward sex is to enjoy it. But be aware that
there are risks. Minimize those risks.
Condoms are an excellent way to do that. Perfect? Nope.
>Love without fear.
No. f.cking irresponsibly based on fantasies is what you want. That's
hardly love.
I hope you really genuinely learn what love is about.
George M. Carter