This may seem an insane idea but I wondered if any of the regular board
members would be interested in an 'off topic', polite and constructive
debate.

When I say 'off topic' that is not completely true. While the subjects
would have nothing to do with 'AIDS', the underlying hypothesis clearly is
relevant to that subject.

The hypothesis I am putting forth is that a great deal of what is
considered 'established scientific fact' makes little or no sense and in
many cases is outright nonsense. Further I believe I can demonstrate that
'expert' sources (Encyclopedia Britannica for example) publish information
that is wrong, and yet is generally accepted, even by experts in the
field.

The debate would cover three subjects: -
Confined to one string.

1). Why a magnetized magnet is NOT magnetized and therefore puts certain
assumptions based on Newtonian physics in question.

2). Why the accepted geometry of the Earth's magnetic field is
impossible.

3). Why the accepted theory that the King's chamber, in the Great Pyramid
of Gaza, was intended as the original resting place of the Pharaoh and
then abandoned in favor of a chamber in the middle of the structure is
utter nonsense. Also why the accepted theory that the pyramid was looted
is also illogical. And why the Kings chamber real function is blatantly
obvious and easily demonstrated.

If I can defend these three seemingly impossible assertions with any
reasonable degree of credibility, then I submit that have proven my point.
That point being that 'accepted science' can frequently be illogical and
irrational and capable of promoting pure garbage and yet is generally
accepted, without question.

Any one interested in the challenge?

Paul