 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / January 2005US Army proves 'AIDS' is not an std.
The U.S. Army study of 1.1 million G.I.'s who were stationed in the Phillipines (over a ten year period) and kept 100,000 prostitutes in business (70% were said to be HIV positive. The study showed only ONE was HIV positive and not sick.This was the only case of mass HIV testing in the World. Condoms in the Phillipines are of such poor quality that only 8% can even hold water. >The U.S. Army study of 1.1 million G.I.'s who were stationed in the >Phillipines (over a ten year period) and kept 100,000 prostitutes in >business (70% were said to be HIV positive. More completely fabricated stories and numbers. Who can believe this after you have been shown to be a liar time and time and time again? From the greatest liar ofd all time that is almost a compliment. Check the facts yourself bonehead. Less than nine months after the US base in Manila was closed the Red Light District was closed. It occupied three streets each abouth half a mile long. The US Army had, in essence, kept 70,000 to 100,000 prostitutes in business.........and NO 'AIDS'. >Less than nine months after the US base in Manila was closed the Red Light >District was closed. It occupied three streets each abouth half a mile >long. > >The US Army had, in essence, kept 70,000 to 100,000 prostitutes in >business.........and NO 'AIDS'. So you claim. Without any supporting documentation. Here's a Q-tip Paul. The sh.t your so full of appears to be oozing out the ears.... "Without any supporting documentation." Not without supporting evidence. >Less than nine months after the US base in Manila was closed the Red Light >District was closed. It occupied three streets each abouth half a mile >long. > >The US Army had, in essence, kept 70,000 to 100,000 prostitutes in >business.........and NO 'AIDS'. 70,000 prostitutes along a mile and a half of roads is about 8.8 prostitutes per foot. Those roads must have been lined with high-rise hook shops.  SignatureDavid Canzi > The U.S. Army study of 1.1 million G.I.'s who were stationed in the > Phillipines (over a ten year period) and kept 100,000 prostitutes in > business (70% were said to be HIV positive. > > The study showed only ONE was HIV positive and not sick.This was the only > case of mass HIV testing in the World.\ Really, the only case of mass HIV testing? Hummm you have posted numerous articles purporting to reference the testing of millions of Russians so in which post are you lieing Paul this one or the ones about the testing in Russia? Gary Stein This was at that time, BEFORE the Russian testing. This happened just a few years after the US withdrawl from Manila. You are not up on your modern history......or much else. Human Life International Special Report No. 171 March 1999 Fr. Matthew Habiger The big question: how successful is Operation AIDS-Free Philippines? Rene has hard data. In 1984 the first 20 cases of AIDS appeared in the Philippines. That same year, Thailand reported one case. While the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) and the UN's WHO were touting the condom as protection ("safe sex") against this deadly disease, Rene promoted the only human solution that's also 100 percent effective. As of 1998, 14 years later, the Philippines had only 1,130 known cases of HIV-positive people and people with full-blown AIDS. There were 187 deaths due to AIDS. This in a population of 73 million. ________ snip >As of 1998, 14 years later, the Philippines had only 1,130 known cases of >HIV-positive people and people with full-blown AIDS. There were 187 deaths >due to AIDS. This in a population of 73 million. Presuming Paul hasn't altered the content of this posting, let's say that is a great thing for the Philippines. Indeed, this country has had, happily, a very low incidence of HIV so far. But-- a) it doesn't mean that HIV doesn't exist or cause AIDS. They don't dispute that. b) that the need for vigilance has declined; nor c) that things don't change. Data from 2004 are below. Indeed, in 1970, there were zero cases of HIV or AIDS in most of the world. First incident cases were undoubtedly occurring. Things were changing. Then AIDS appeared. Caused by HIV..... George M. Carter ** see http://www.youandaids.org/Asia%20Pacific%20at%20a%20Glance/Philippines/index.asp ... HIV Situation The first case of HIV was reported in 1984. The epidemic in the Philippines has been classified as low level. It is estimated that 9,400 people were living with HIV/AIDS in the Philippines by the end of 2001. The Philippines has a relatively low prevalence rate in the world with less than one percent of Filipino adults infected with HIV. ... Learn your ABC. None of your a,b,c points make any sense and do not explain anything. Another 'tis so', 'tis so' post. >This was at that time, BEFORE the Russian testing. > >This happened just a few years after the US withdrawl from Manila. *What* happened a few years after the US withdrawal? >You are not up on your modern history......or much else. History isn't one of my good subjects, either, but if there was something happening in the Philippines that required the presence of 1.1 million American servicemen for 10 years, and close enough to Manila to keep 100,000 prostitutes in business there, even I would have heard about it. SignatureDavid Canzi Not 1.1 million at one time. They rotated over 10 years idiot. If you didn't know America had a huge base in Manila your history clearly is lacking. Do you enjoy making a fool of yourself? HISTORY LESSON US Bases In The Philippines INTRODUCTION The longest relationship between the United States of America and a Southeast Asian country has been the US military involvement in the Philippines. For almost a century, the US military had use of two major bases in the Philippines, Clark Air Force Base, and Subic Naval Station. It took a strong anti-nuclear, anti-imperialist mass movement and a majority vote in the Philippine Senate to finally end the long US military occupation. The 1991 US military withdrawal from the Philippines was expected to cause a “power vacuum” that would have adverse economic and political effects on the former US colony. Was this really the case in the Philippines? Economic Effects of the Bases The Economic impact of the US Bases on the Philippine economy was undoubtingly significant. The US military spent over $500 million a year in the country on salaries, the purchase of supplies and services, and other military and economic aid given to the Philippine government. One estimate claimed that the total amount of economic contribution amounted to as much as US$ 1 billion annually . In March of 1987 the Philippine News reported that the bases employed 23,168 full-time workers, 22,834 contract workers, and 444 concessionaires for a total of 46,446 Filipinos with annual salaries totaling $96 million . The US Information Service claimed that, “The U.S. facilities create a great deal of indirect employment by doing business with Philippine companies – over 900 had contracts with the bases in 1985….” The Bases seemed to be pumping in millions of U.S dollars into an impoverished economy. Yet these figures can be quite misleading. Direct Filipino employment on the U.S. bases only amounted to some 5% of the total 1.18 million Filipinos employed by the Philippine government at that time http://www.wowessays.com/dbase/ae4/lmy301.shtml _______ Subsequently, the U.S. built 23 military installations covering a total area of more than 240,000 hectares ofland (2,400 sq.km.) by the time of the signing of the Military Bases Agreement in 1947. At its peak the bases occupied nearly 1% of the country's total land area not to mention 11,000 hectares of territorial waters and a large swath of air space. _______ The number of prostituted persons in the Philippines is about the size of the country's manufacturing workforce, according to Rene Ofreneo, a former Philippine labor undersecretary and an expert on the sex trade. (Dario Agnote, "Sex trade key part of S.E. Asian economies, study says," Kyodo News, 18 August 1998) There are 400,000 to 500,000 prostituted persons in the Philippines. Prostituted persons are mainly adult women, but there are also male, transvestite and child prostitutes, both girls and boys. (International Labor Organization. Dario Agnote, "Sex trade key part of S.E. Asian economies, study says," Kyodo News, 18 August 1998) In the Philippines, a recent study showed there are about 75,000 children, who were forced into prostitution due to poverty. (Dario Agnote, "Sex trade key part of S.E. Asian economies, study says," Kyodo News, 18 August 1998) There are 400,000 women in prostitution in 1998, excluding unregistered, seasonal prostitutes, overseas entertainers and victims of external trafficking. One fourth of them are children and each year 3,266 more children are forced into the sex industry. (GABRIELA, Diana Mendoza, "RP Has 400,000 Prostitutes," TODAY, 25 February 1998) Military prostitution, it added, has always been a problem in the past when the US bases were still in the country. Past experience clearly showed that the security of the Filipino people, especially women and children, from the US military was never taken into account. ("Ex-streetwalkers fight VFA: Form advocacy groups in urban centers," The Philippine Journal, 18 September 1998) HISTORY LESSON US Bases In The Philippines INTRODUCTION The longest relationship between the United States of America and a Southeast Asian country has been the US military involvement in the Philippines. For almost a century, the US military had use of two major bases in the Philippines, Clark Air Force Base, and Subic Naval Station. It took a strong anti-nuclear, anti-imperialist mass movement and a majority vote in the Philippine Senate to finally end the long US military occupation. The 1991 US military withdrawal from the Philippines was expected to cause a “power vacuum” that would have adverse economic and political effects on the former US colony. Was this really the case in the Philippines? Economic Effects of the Bases The Economic impact of the US Bases on the Philippine economy was undoubtingly significant. The US military spent over $500 million a year in the country on salaries, the purchase of supplies and services, and other military and economic aid given to the Philippine government. One estimate claimed that the total amount of economic contribution amounted to as much as US$ 1 billion annually . In March of 1987 the Philippine News reported that the bases employed 23,168 full-time workers, 22,834 contract workers, and 444 concessionaires for a total of 46,446 Filipinos with annual salaries totaling $96 million . The US Information Service claimed that, “The U.S. facilities create a great deal of indirect employment by doing business with Philippine companies – over 900 had contracts with the bases in 1985….” The Bases seemed to be pumping in millions of U.S dollars into an impoverished economy. Yet these figures can be quite misleading. Direct Filipino employment on the U.S. bases only amounted to some 5% of the total 1.18 million Filipinos employed by the Philippine government at that time http://www.wowessays.com/dbase/ae4/lmy301.shtml _______ Subsequently, the U.S. built 23 military installations covering a total area of more than 240,000 hectares ofland (2,400 sq.km.) by the time of the signing of the Military Bases Agreement in 1947. At its peak the bases occupied nearly 1% of the country's total land area not to mention 11,000 hectares of territorial waters and a large swath of air space. _______ The number of prostituted persons in the Philippines is about the size of the country's manufacturing workforce, according to Rene Ofreneo, a former Philippine labor undersecretary and an expert on the sex trade. (Dario Agnote, "Sex trade key part of S.E. Asian economies, study says," Kyodo News, 18 August 1998) There are 400,000 to 500,000 prostituted persons in the Philippines. Prostituted persons are mainly adult women, but there are also male, transvestite and child prostitutes, both girls and boys. (International Labor Organization. Dario Agnote, "Sex trade key part of S.E. Asian economies, study says," Kyodo News, 18 August 1998) In the Philippines, a recent study showed there are about 75,000 children, who were forced into prostitution due to poverty. (Dario Agnote, "Sex trade key part of S.E. Asian economies, study says," Kyodo News, 18 August 1998) There are 400,000 women in prostitution in 1998, excluding unregistered, seasonal prostitutes, overseas entertainers and victims of external trafficking. One fourth of them are children and each year 3,266 more children are forced into the sex industry. (GABRIELA, Diana Mendoza, "RP Has 400,000 Prostitutes," TODAY, 25 February 1998) Military prostitution, it added, has always been a problem in the past when the US bases were still in the country. Past experience clearly showed that the security of the Filipino people, especially women and children, from the US military was never taken into account. ("Ex-streetwalkers fight VFA: Form advocacy groups in urban centers," The Philippine Journal, 18 September 1998) "Why don't Filipinos want US troops in the Philippines? There is a long history of US military intervention in the Philippines from the Philippine-American War (1899-1916) in which the US colonized the Philippines. Filipinos resisted and one-eighth of the Filipino people were killed. Even though the Philippines officially became independent from the US in 1946, the US ensured control of the US military bases in the Philippines and access to Philippine natural resources. The US military bases were finally kicked out in 1991 after mass protest from the Filipino people who were tired of special protected status for US soldiers, toxic wastes (that until today, the US refuses to clean up), the prostitution of Filipinas, and the spread of alcoholism and drug use. Filipinos don't want these again. " >Not 1.1 million at one time. They rotated over 10 years idiot. They must have gotten really dizzy rotating for 10 years... So how many soldiers were *typically* there, and how often would each have to go to the high-rise brothels to keep 70,000 to 100,000 prostitutes in business? SignatureDavid Canzi On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:05:00 +0000 (UTC), dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi -- non-mailable address) wrote: >>Not 1.1 million at one time. They rotated over 10 years idiot. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >each have to go to the high-rise brothels to keep 70,000 to 100,000 >prostitutes in business? Do you REALLY wanna go down that path?? Into the maze of Paul's bizarre brain and his feverish conception of numbers?? Yow! Brave fellow!! Better to whirl dervishly.... " Into the maze of Paul's bizarre brain and his feverish conception of numbers?" You mean like they should add up? >" Into the maze of Paul's bizarre brain and his feverish conception of >numbers?" > >You mean like they should add up? Hahahahahahahaha! ROFLMAO. Thanks, Paul. Gosh, yer a card.... "So how many soldiers were *typically* there, and how often would each have to go to the high-rise brothels to keep 70,000 to 100,000 prostitutes in business?" You figure it out. >Not 1.1 million at one time. They rotated over 10 years idiot. Sufi sex workers??? idiot!! FU idiot. >FU idiot. Thanks dear, but you ain't my type.....not into barebacking jackanapes.... > This was at that time, BEFORE the Russian testing. > > This happened just a few years after the US withdrawl from Manila. > > You are not up on your modern history......or much else. No I was fully aware that the Russian testing occurred, I just showed you in yet another lie................ Gary Stein What lie? Just because EVERY word you utter is a lie does not mean others do the same. You really are a total scumbag. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.