Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

[GayMensHealthSummit] Season's Greetings as a PSA from across the pond

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Don Saklad - 23 Dec 2004 06:05 GMT
         The zinger to this bit should be... do the strategy,
         get tested together before you have sex

> Delivered-To: mailing list GayMensHealthSummit@yahoogroups.com
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GayMensHealthSummit/
> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:24:35 -0800
> Subject: [GayMensHealthSummit]
>          Season's Greetings as a PSA from across the pond
>
> ...and one more reason to admire our British cousins!  --
> Be sure your speakers are turned on
> http://www.playingsafely.co.uk/12stisofchristmas/12-STIs.html 
PaulKing - 23 Dec 2004 07:45 GMT
Get tested with a test that shows nothing and can lead to death via toxic
meds.

Great advice if you want to make this your last Christmas.

A Great Profit will come to the land, however, but it will not be Christ
but a profit in Glaxco's bank account.

Actually all those dreadful Christmas carols are enough to make even death
by liver failure seem acceptable.

NEVER, NEVER TEST.

Happy, test free, holidays.

Paul
PaulKing - 23 Dec 2004 08:59 GMT
How a 99.99% Accurate Test Can Be Wrong Half the Time
By Christine Maggiore
 
“A new article in Popular Science explains how allegedly accurate HIV
tests can be dead wrong when performed on people with no risk factors…”
 
===
 
An article in the July 2002 issue of Popular Science magazine gives
readers some surprising food for thought: the allegedly accurate HIV tests
can be dead wrong when performed on people with no risk factors. Here’s
the text from page 78:
 
"HIV testing is 99.99 percent accurate, a doctor might tell his patient.
That suggests that if you receive a positive result, you almost certainly
have HIV. But this is not necessarily the case. The chance of a straight
man with no known risk factors contracting HIV is roughly one in 10,000.
That is also the rate at which an HIV test returns an incorrect result. So
if 10,000 men in this low-risk group get tested for HIV, an average one
positive will come back from the man with HIV, and another man will test
positive even though he is not infected. Thus, in our statistically
perfect world, only one of the two men who test positive actually has HIV.
50 percent of positive HIV tests in the low-risk group turn out to be
false."
 
The article incorrectly assumes that HIV tests can diagnose HIV infection
and that the claimed accuracy rate of 99.99% has been established through
careful scientific studies. In fact, HIV tests have not been approved by
the US Food and Drug Administration for use in diagnosing actual HIV
infection, and all claims of test accuracy are based on estimates and
assumptions.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.