Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Nevirapine death

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
john - 16 Dec 2004 14:56 GMT
>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=541&ncid=716&e=7&u=/ap/2004
1216/ap_on_he_me/aids_drug_death

AP Exclusive: Woman Died During AIDS Study

10 minutes ago   Health - AP

By JOHN SOLOMON and RANDY HERSCHAFT, Associated Press Writers

A pregnant Tennessee woman who enrolled in federally funded research in
hopes of saving her soon-to-be-born son from getting AIDS (news - web
sites) died last year when doctors continued to give her an experimental
drug regimen despite signs of liver failure, government memos say.

Family members of Joyce Ann Hafford say the 33-year-old HIV (news - web
sites)-positive woman died without ever holding her newborn boy. They also
said they never were told the National Institutes of Health (news - web
sites) concluded the drug therapy likely caused her death.

The family first learned of NIH's conclusions when The Associated Press
obtained copies of the case file this month. For the past year, they say
they were left to believe Hafford, of Memphis, Tenn., died from AIDS
complications but began pursuing litigation to learn more.

"They tried to make it sound like she was just sick. They never connected
it to the drug," said Rubbie King, Hafford's sister.

"If it were the disease, solely the disease, and the complications
associated with the disease, that would be more readily acceptable than her
being administered medication that came with warnings that the medical
community failed to get ... to her."

Documents show Hafford's case reverberated among the government's top
scientists in Washington, who were monitoring reports of her declining
health in late July 2003 as she lay on a respirator.

NIH officials quickly suspected the drug regimen because it included
nevirapine, a drug known to cause liver problems, and the case eventually
reached the nation's chief AIDS researcher.

"Ouch! Not much wwe (we) can do about dumd (dumb) docs," Dr. Edmund
Tramont, NIH's AIDS Division chief, responded in an e-mail after his staff
reported that doctors continued to administer the drugs nevirapine and
Combivir to Hafford despite signs of liver failure.

Nevirapine is an antiretroviral AIDS drug used since the mid-1990s, and the
government has warned since at least 2000 that it could cause lethal liver
problems or rashes when taken in multiple doses over time.

NIH officials acknowledge that experimental drugs, most likely nevirapine,
caused her death, and that keeping the family in the dark was
inappropriate. But NIH usually leaves disclosures like that to the doctors
who treated her, officials said.

"We feel horrible that something like this would happen to anyone in any
circumstance," said Dr. H. Clifford Lane, NIH's No. 2 infectious disease
specialist. "There are risks in research and we try to minimize them."

Jim Kyle, a lawyer representing Regional Medical Center in Memphis where
Hafford died, declined comment because of the family's pending litigation.
The doctors there referred a call seeking comment to NIH.

The study during which Hafford died recently led researchers to conclude
that nevirapine poses risks when taken over time by certain pregnant women.

"Continuous nevirapine may be associated with increased toxicity among
HIV-1 infected pregnant women" with certain liver cell counts, the study
concluded.

Lane said Hafford should have signed a 15-page, NIH-approved consent form
at the start of the experiment specifically warning her of the risks of
liver failure. The family says Hafford seemed unaware of the liver risks.
They even kept the bottle of nevirapine showing it had no safety warnings.

"My daughter didn't know any of the warning signs," said Rubbie Malone,
Hafford's mother and now caretaker of Hafford's new baby and older son.
"She never got to hold her baby."

Lane confirmed the nevirapine bottle Hafford received likely wouldn't have
had safety warnings because the experiment's rules called for the patient
to be unaware of the exact drug effects to avoid patient influence on the
test results. That means the consent form would have been her lone warning
about potential liver problems, he said.

That 15-page, single-spaced consent form is chock full of complex medical
terms like "hypersensitivity reactions" and "pharmacokinetic test." The
warning about potential liver problems shows up on the sixth page, where it
said liver inflammation was possible and "rarely may lead to severe and
life threatening liver damage and death."

Hafford, who was HIV-positive but otherwise healthy, agreed to participate
in the NIH-funded research project that provided her multiple doses of
nevirapine, also known as Viramune, to protect her soon-to-be-born son,
Sterling, from getting HIV at birth.

The project was an outgrowth of earlier research in Africa that concluded
the drug could be taken in single doses safely to protect newborns half the
time.

"She didn't want her baby to be born with HIV infection if it could be
prevented at any cost," said King, her sister.

Hafford died Aug. 1, 2003, less than 72 hours after giving birth. Sterling
was delivered prematurely by Caesarean section as his mother was dying.
Though premature, he was spared from HIV and is healthy.

NIH's documents suggest Hafford's life might also have been spared if the
drug had been stopped when the first liver problems showed up in her blood
work two weeks before death.

"This case was particularly unfortunate b/c (because) the PI (principle
investigative doctor) didn't stop drug when grade 3 liver enzymes were
reported," Dr. Jonathan Fishbein, NIH's chief of good research practices,
told Tramont in an August 2003 e-mail.

Fishbein, who is seeking federal whistleblower protection after raising
concerns about NIH's practices, told AP that Hafford's death is
attributable to a bigger problem in government research.

"This is not just a clinical trial issue this is a healthcare issue. The
public expects that diagnostic test results are promptly evaluated and
acted on, if need be," Fishbein said. "Sadly, this is but one example where
an assessment was not done quickly and it cost this young mother her life."

NIH's official review determined the Memphis hospital failed to react to
lab results that showed her liver failure was starting well before she
died. "The site had identified that there was a delay in reviewing
laboratory evaluations from the clinic visit the week before she presented
with clinical hepatitis," an Aug. 15, 2003, report concluded.

The official investigative files cited "drug-induced hepatitis" of the
liver as the cause of death.

As is routine after a research-related death, NIH ordered changes to the
rules its researchers followed in the nevirapine studies to ensure the
early detection of liver problems, the memos show.

___

On the Net:

Documents gathered by AP for this story are available at:
http://wid.ap.org/documents/nevirapine3.html

National Institutes of Health: http://www.nih.gov

Fishbein's whistleblower Web site: http://www.honestdoctor.org/
john - 16 Dec 2004 15:06 GMT
http://news.yahoo.com/news?
tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041214/ap_on_he_me/aids_drug

AIDS Research Chief Rewrote Safety Report

14 minutes ago   Health - AP

By JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The government's chief of AIDS (news - web sites)
research rewrote a safety report on a U.S.-funded drug study to
change its conclusions and delete negative information. Later, he
ordered the research resumed over the objections of his staff,
documents show.

Dr. Edmund Tramont, chief of the National Institutes of Health (news -
web sites)'s AIDS Division, took responsibility for both decisions.
He cited his four decades of medical experience and argued that
Africans in the midst of an AIDS crisis deserved some leniency in
meeting U.S. safety standards, according to interviews and documents
obtained by The Associated Press.

Tramont's staff, including his top deputy, had urged more scrutiny of
the Uganda research site to ensure it overcame record-keeping
problems, violations of federal patient safety safeguards and other
issues that forced a 15-month halt to the research into using
nevirapine to prevent African babies from getting AIDS from their
mothers.

AP reported Monday that NIH knew about the problems in early 2002 but
did not tell the White House before President Bush (news - web sites)
launched a plan that summer to spread nevirapine throughout Africa.
Now, officials have new concerns the drug may cause long-term
resistance in patients who received it, foreclosing future treatment
options.

"I am not convinced that the site is indeed prepared to become
active," Dr. Jonathan Fishbein, an expert NIH hired to improve the
agency's research practices, wrote Tramont in July 2003.

Fishbein contended he should be given time to review Uganda's
capabilities and safety monitoring before letting the site reopen, or
NIH would risk being "toothless" in its new efforts to clean up
sloppy research practices. He added that professional safety monitors
hired by NIH had reservations about the site.

Tramont dismissed the safety monitors' concerns, saying he didn't
believe they fully understood AIDS.

"I am convinced that this site is ready to resume given the
limitations of doing research in any resource-poor, underdeveloped
country," Tramont wrote July 8, 2003, in response to Fishbein.

"I want this restriction lifted ASAP because this site is now the
best in Africa run by black Africans and everyone has worked so hard
to get it right as evidence by the fact that their lab is now
certified," he wrote.

NIH officials acknowledge Tramont rewrote the report and overruled
his staff on the reopening, but said he did so because he was more
experienced and had an "honest difference of opinion" with his safety
experts. They noted he had no financial interest in nevirapine and
that the troubled study began well before he joined NIH in 2001.

Those who raised objections "were part of a large team of which Dr.
Tramont was the head, and it is important that the people involved in
that team should express their opinion and there should be
discussion," said Dr. H. Clifford Lane, the NIH's No. 2 infectious
disease specialist and one of Tramont's bosses.

"But at the end of the day the final responsibility lies with the
head of the team and it is his job to put that together the way he
sees it," Lane said.

Lane said an internal NIH review concluded Tramont had not engaged in
scientific misconduct. Separately, the National Academy of Sciences
(news - web sites) continues to investigate whether the Uganda
research was valid.

NIH believes it helped save hundreds of thousands of African babies
by allowing nevirapine to be used in single doses to block the AIDS
virus, Lane said. But he acknowledged the research was imperfect, and
NIH now believes nevirapine should no longer be a first choice for
newborn protection - if other options exist - because of the newly
discovered problems about resistance.

Tramont wrote in 2003 e-mails that he reopened the clinics because he
didn't want NIH "perceived as bureaucratic but rather thoughtful and
reasonable" and that it was important to encourage Africans' fight
against AIDS "especially when the president is about to visit them."

Bush visited the continent a few days after Tramont ordered the
clinics reopened.

Tramont's actions, however, drew a blunt reply from his top deputy.

"I think we are cutting off our noses to spite our face here," AIDS
Division Deputy Director Jonathan Kagan wrote. "...We should not be
motivated by political gains and it's dangerous for you, of all
people, to be diminishing the value of our monitors."

Tramont prevailed and the research resumed. A few days later, Tramont
sent a note to his staff ordering the end of an 18-month-long debate
inside NIH over whether the science from the Uganda trials was valid
and safe. That debate began in early 20002 when two audits divulged
widespread problems with the research.

The Uganda trial "has been reviewed, re-monitored, debated and
scrutinized. To do any more would be beyond reason. It is time to put
it behind us and move on," Tramont wrote in a July 13, 2003 e-mail
instructing his staff that future issues about the drug be handled
directly by his office.

Five months earlier, Tramont surprised one of his own medical
officers who had written a report summarizing safety concerns
uncovered during a second review of the Uganda trial.

Dr. Betsy Smith's report, finished in January 2003, said the Uganda
trial suffered from "incomplete or inadequate safety reporting" and
that records on patients were "of poor quality and below expected
standards of clinical research."

She strongly urged NIH not to make sweeping conclusions about
nevirapine based on the Uganda research. "Safety conclusions from
this trial should be very conservative," she wrote.

Behind the scenes, Tramont asked to see Smith's report before it was
submitted to medical authorities, including the Food and Drug
Administration (news - web sites). "I need to see the primary data -
too much riding on this report," Tramont wrote Jan. 23, 2003.

A few weeks later, the safety report was published and sent to FDA
(news - web sites) without Smith's concerns and with a new
conclusion.

The study "has demonstrated the safety of single dose nevirapine for
the prevention of maternal to child transmission," Tramont's version
concluded. "Although discrepancies were found in the database and
some unreported AEs (adverse reactions) were discovered ... these
were not clinically important in determining the safety profile."

In disbelief, Tramont's staff began inquiring how Smith's report got
changed. An answer came back from the top.

"I wrote it," Tramont responded.
___

On the Net:

Documents gathered by AP for this story are available at:
http://wid.ap.org/documents/nevirapine2.html

National Institutes of Health: http://www.nih.gov
PaulKing - 16 Dec 2004 22:35 GMT
Dear John,

'AIDS' Day has turned into Dissident Month. Story after story after story,
all proving we were right, have flooded the press wires on an almost daily
basis.

For such 'fools' it is strange that EVERYTHING we said is being
confirmed.

Best wishes,

Paul
Victory for truth
http://www.dissidentaction.com

EVERYTHING.
john - 17 Dec 2004 08:16 GMT
> Dear John,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> For such 'fools' it is strange that EVERYTHING we said is being
> confirmed.

They are all going down if I have anything to do with it---on the vaccine
front they had one huge hit with flu vaccine where Chiron lost around 20
million flu jabs due to contamination, and Merck is going to go down in
flames when the MMR is proven to cause autism

Pharma med is just the most biggest hoax designed to weed out the useless
eaters while taking all their tax money

"The pharmaceutical "business with disease" is the largest deception and
fraud business in human history. The product "health" promised by drug
companies is not delivered to millions of patients. Instead, the "products"
most often delivered are the opposite: new diseases and frequently,
death."--Dr Rath MD

"The American Medical Association is fashioned to prescribe drugs and
perform various treatments that although they may be unsuspecting, tend to
weed out the weaker species. The Council views the AMA's 'modern medicine'
as barbaric. "-Brice Taylor (Thanks For The Memories p 283)
http://www.whale.to/a/hoaxpharma.html
PaulKing - 17 Dec 2004 00:31 GMT
We told them so. Now the truth is out.

ttp://groups.msn.com/HAARTisHeartless/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=0&ID_Message=9&LastModified=4675491031142594187
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.