U.S. Admitted AIDS Research Violated Rules
1 hour, 40 minutes ago
White House - AP Cabinet & State
By JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - U.S. health officials told Uganda's government that a
U.S.-funded study there on using an AIDS (news - web sites) drug to
protect babies violated federal safety rules even though they didn't tell
President Bush (news - web sites) before he authorized shipping the drug
to Africa.
The Department of Health and Human Services (news - web sites)' Office for
Human Research Protections identified nearly nine-pages of problems with
the National Institutes of Health (news - web sites) research project on
nevirapine in Uganda in a July 2002 letter that pointedly identified
several violations of federal patient protection rules.
The letter also proposed numerous corrective actions.
"OHRP find that the ARC (the project's oversight committee) failed to
conduct continuing reviews of the above-referenced research as required by
HHS regulations," the letter to Uganda's National Council of Science and
Technology said.
The letter identified problems that included lowering, without permission,
the standards for disclosing bad reactions during the drug research, and
giving patients information about the risks "that may not have been
understandable."
It was sent just a month after Bush, unaware of NIH's safety concerns
about the research, authorized a $500 million initiative to use nevirapine
throughout Africa to protect babies from getting HIV (news - web sites)
from infected mothers.
The Ugandan government thanked the U.S agency for its findings, adding it
was sometimes difficult to meet ethical standards in poor countries.
"These conditions tend to dictate the level of compliance with the
required ethical issues of biomedical research," the Ugandans replied.
PaulKing - 14 Dec 2004 09:46 GMT
South Africa to tighten control on drug trials after five deaths
Pat Sidley , Johannesburg
South Africa's HIV/AIDS drug trials industry has been thrown into
confusion after the government had to intervene and stop a trial in which
five patients died. About 11% of patients in the trial showed signs of
severe liver toxicity, and serious allegations were levelled against the
trial organisers that women involved in one site of the trial had not
given fully informed consent.
This problem has arisen amid serious soul searching among medicines'
regulators, research ethics committees, drug companies, and doctors after
research procedures had to be questioned when Werner Bezwoda falsified
research results into treatments for breast cancer (12 February, p 398;
18 March, p 732).
The drug trial in question was known as the FTC 302 trial and was being
conducted in adults. According to Dr Helen Rees, who chairs the regulatory
authority, the Medicines Control Council, the aim of the trial was to
document the safety and efficacy of different combinations of
antiretroviral drugs, including a new unregistered drug called
emtricitabine.
It also included the new drug nevirapine, manufactured by Boehringer
Ingelheim and being tested in South Africa for its use in the prevention
of vertical transmission of HIV. Some 16 sites were being used around the
country.
The applicant was a US pharmaceutical company, Triangle, which was told to
stop recruiting patients for the trial and was then told to stop the
trial.
It was initially believed that the health minister, Dr Manto
Tshabalala-Msimang, had stopped all drug trials relating to HIV and AIDS,
particularly those using nevirapine and to prevent all vertical
transmission. There remains considerable confusion in the industry.
The Medicines Control Council has been reviewing its control of drug
trials, as have various ethics committees. The ethics committee that was
supposed to have had been involved in the FTC 302 trial has emerged from
the problem with its reputation seriously damaged.
The number of drug trials in South Africa have risen rapidly recently, and
there seems to be widespread consensus that the system is in urgent need
of an overhaul. Dr Rees of the Medicines Control Council said that the
council, the health department, and various ethics committees had been
involved in restructuring the way clinical trials are dealt with.
The council has had a ministerially appointed clinical trials committee to
help advise it on these issues. Despite this, questions remain over the
methods used in the wake of the Bezwoda affair and this latest
development.