Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Flooding attack

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 10 Dec 2004 07:48 GMT
If the facts were on your side, you would not be trying to destroy
mainstream AIDS forums on the internet by flooding them with repeated
articles.

The truth does not need to shout.

Signature

David Canzi

PaulKing - 10 Dec 2004 08:12 GMT
It does need to be shouted out.

I wish people had 'shouted' more in the pre-amble to the rise of fascism.

I will keep 'shouting' until this evil myth is dead and forgotten.

AIDS IS A MYTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
___________________________
___________________________

Loud enough for you Canzi?
GMCarter - 10 Dec 2004 11:29 GMT
>It does need to be shouted out.

LOL. Right. So that you can drown out that little nagging voice that
says you're wrong. HIV exists. And it causes AIDS.

And you can scream and squeal and shout, lie and distort all you want,
but that's the reality.

I wish you were right. And I hope soon HIV will go away--through a
cure, attenuation, whatever. But hopes don't butter the bread or
change reality.

Any more than your little flood of posts, which dissolve away under
scrutiny like yellow snow under a hot sun.

        George M. Carter
PaulKing - 11 Dec 2004 00:17 GMT
"drown out that little nagging voice"

Dear Mr. Carter,

It would be illigal to drown you even at your request.

Sorry I cannot help. May I suggest you lay off the 'yellow snow', it is
more addictive than the white kind. It could be the source of your
delusions about a big bad virus that can do most anything.

Best wishes,

Paul
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 11 Dec 2004 05:38 GMT
You go into web forums whose content you disagree with, flood them
with enough repetitious articles to make them unuseable, and boast
afterwards on your dissident action site of getting another "apologist"
forum shut down.

What you're doing is not discussion, debate, education or even
propaganda.  It's an attempt to silence the voices of those who
disagree with you.  It's censorship.

You have no right to accuse others.

Signature

David Canzi

njb35@cantab.net - 15 Dec 2004 02:23 GMT
> What you're doing is not discussion, debate, education or even
> propaganda.  It's an attempt to silence the voices of those who
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> --
> David Canzi

I particularly love the "moderation" of the dissident groups.

Hey Paul, when I originally posted that Beltz had publically, to a
leading dissident no less, stated that AZT was not toxic you let my
statements lie.  As soon as I supplied a website URL to back it up you
rejected my post and deleted all references I made to Beltz from the
DAG forum.

Scared of the truth?
http://davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/Beltz-AZT.html

Bennett
Educatedconcerned9 - 12 Dec 2004 08:54 GMT
I couldn't agree more Dmcanzi.  The claim censorship or freedom of speech
lol, however freedom of speech can only be taken so far.  When someones
opinions cause harm to the general public then censorship come into play.
To tell people AIDS is a myth, to not take meds because the big
pharmaceutical companies are poisoning us in the name of the almighty
dollar, to not use condoms because it is repressing the freedom of sex, is
nothing short of criminal, nothing short of attempted murder.  The truth
is known and only the truth will prevail, soon those people behind the
dissident information will pay dearly for their crimes against humanity.  
Gary Stein - 14 Dec 2004 19:45 GMT
I would love to see the estate of some poor soul who bought into the
dissident lies and died as a result launch a lawsuit seeking damages from
Paul and his ilk it would be a very interesting court case.

Just ponder on who the defense would call as expert witnesses and the utter
surety that no judge would grant expert status to 90% of the dissident
spokesmen a prime example being the so called Perth Group who have not a
single member with any formal training in infectious diseases, virology,
public health, as an epidemiologist, or in electron microscopy.

They might be able to get Duesburg and Mullis on the stand and that would be
about it the rest of there list of so called experts are either crackpots,
non-scientists, or scientists in fields that have absolutely no relevance to
medicine virology or epidemiology.

Gary Stein

>I couldn't agree more Dmcanzi.  The claim censorship or freedom of speech
> lol, however freedom of speech can only be taken so far.  When someones
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> is known and only the truth will prevail, soon those people behind the
> dissident information will pay dearly for their crimes against humanity.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.