Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

BBC Airs NYC forced drugging story.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
PaulKing - 10 Dec 2004 03:29 GMT
BBC Airs NYC forced drugging story.

Tuesday Nov 30 at 7.30 to 8.00 PM - BBC 2

Liam Scheff's investigation into the forced drugging of children in NYC
(and nationally) as part of NIH clinical trials is receiving an airing on

BBC television Tonight (Tues 11/30/04).

The UK crew filmed several interviews with mothers who have lost custody
of their children for refusing to drug them with chemotherapy drugs such
as AZT, and potent cell-killing drugs like Nevirapine.

Liam Scheff is credited as providing the original research for the
project.

This filmproject is one of many stories that has emerged from the
Incarnation Children's Center/ NIH forced-drugging scandal that emerged
after the publication of Scheff's "The House That AIDS Built."

But the mainstream press (as well as Liberal media like Democracy Now)
still have not taken notice of the currently-sanctioned medical practice
of surgically inserting feeding tubes into the abdomens of children who
cannot take or refuse to take speculative, and often toxic medications.

How do we remedy this situation?

Drawing attention to the malfeasance of big Pharma is still, in many ways,
a grass-roots issue.

It is up to us - all of us - to make it known - and every effort counts.

I ask you therefore to please contact your local media - print, radio,
television, and world wide web - and let them know about this story.

Liam Scheff, the prime investigator of the ICC story, is available to talk
about this current medical practice and can be reached at:
liamscheff@yahoo.com

The researchers who understand this issue well might also enjoy a public
airing of their research, and of the shut-out they receive when they
speak publicly about institutional corruption and medical malfeasance.

The issue of forced drugging of children is a powerful, and draws
attention to the lack of oversite that has been granted to big Pharma by
an under-educated public.

The time to act is now.

Get your local media on the story.

In addition to media, look for support in your community - look at local
humanitarian agencies, educators, community leaders, social activists,
pastors, children's and family rights groups, immigrant rights groups,
etc.that take an interest in democracy, ethics and human rights.

It is important to keep the conversation alive, and to let concerned
citizens - liberals, conservatives, reds, blues, and beyond - know that
the medical infrastructure is misusing children in human experiments.

Unless we take a stand, we are letting it happen.
Please use any of the following articles to make the point -

Crux Magazine - HIV Negative:

http://www.cruxmag.com/asset/crux_hivnegative.pdf

NY Press - Orphans On Trial:
http://www.altheal.org/toxicity/orphans.htm

AHRP letter to the NIH/FDA:
http://www.ahrp.org/ahrpspeaks/HIVkids0304.php

A&U Magazine: http://www.aumag.org/viewfinder/leftMay04.html
UK Guardian/Observer:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1185305,00.html

Independent:

http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/story.jsp?story=587418

BBC TV Listing:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/proginfo/pdfs/tv/week48/bbctvwk48_tues.pdf

Guinea Pig Kids
7.30-8.00pm BBC TWO
bbc.co.uk/thisworld

Children in care, some as young as a few months old, are being forced to
take part in experimental drugs trials which can make them chronically
sick.

If foster parents or family members stop giving drugs to the children they
risk losing them and being branded child abusers.

Jamie Doran reports that the kids are poor and black - but this isn't
happening in a developing country. It's happening in New York and the drug
companies include some of the world's biggest.The children in the
programme are born to HIV-positive mothers who die shortly after giving
birth.They are tested with Aids drugs including AZT in various
combinations.

"My daughter told me that when she went to see the doctor, the man said he
would give her $25 a month to put the child on an experimental basis  and
that they would be sending transportation. She said 'no'.And the doctor
told her 'you will regret it'," says Regina, the grandmother of a child in
the programme.

Now she has to visit the child at the home of a foster parent, who is a
drinker in a rough neighbourhood, being paid $2,000 a month to look after
her grandchild.The only difference is that she is happy to give him the
drugs.

There is no evidence that the drugs are prolonging the children's lives
but plenty that they are causing them distress and sickness. One foster
mother, Jacklyn Hoerger, worked in the home at the centre of the story,
the Incarnation Care Centre in Harlem which is run by the Catholic
Church.

She is a trained paediatric nurse and she realised that by stopping the
medication the children's health dramatically improved.
PaulKing - 14 Dec 2004 04:40 GMT
This story was broken first on http://www.dissidentaction.com
and now has been published by The Observer (UK0, NY Post (cover), New York
Press (cover), BBC Television and now Fox News.

NYC Must Come Clean on Foster Kids AIDS Scandal
Tuesday, December 07, 2004
By Wendy McElroy

March 03, 2004

Last week, the BBC aired a documentary entitled "Guinea Pig Kids."

It accused New York City’s Administration for Child Services and drug
companies, such as Glaxo SmithKline (GKS), of experimenting on
HIV-positive foster children with untested and dangerous anti-AIDS drugs.

Two basic accusations were leveled.

First, parents or guardians who refused to consent to the trials claim
that children were removed by ACS and placed in foster families or
children’s homes. Then, acting over their objections, ACS authorized the
drug trials.

The second accusation: the drugs administered to children as young as
three-months-old did not demonstrably extend their livespan but did
inflict harm and great suffering. Children who resisted were force-fed
drugs through a peg-tube inserted into their stomachs.

The charges merit both skepticism and thorough investigation. But, with
ACS stonewalling, facts are hard to come by.

Some facts are known.

In the 1990s, experimental anti-AIDS drugs were administered to foster
children in ACS custody. In response to the BBC’s accusations, GSK
defended those trials by saying that the Food and Drug Administration
encourages pediatric testing.

"[C]linical trials involving children and orphans are therefore legal and
not unusual," the company said. GSK called the trials "appropriate" as
long as they are "in compliance…with the various state and federal laws
and regulations regarding legal authority in the case of minors."

The issue of legal authority lies at the heart of the first accusation:
namely, that ACS overruled the objections of legal guardians.

The charge first appeared on Feb. 29 in a series of articles written by
Douglas Montero for the New York Post. On March 10, FOX News also
addressed the potential scandal.

Montero focused on the case Jacklyn Hoerger, as did "Guinea Pig Kids." A
pediatric nurse, Hoerger became foster mother to two HIV-positive girls
who received treatment at Manhattan’s Incarnation Children's Center. (ICC
is one of the sites implicated in the experiments.) Convinced that the
"highly toxic" drugs were harmful, not beneficial, Hoerger stopped
administering them and pursued alternate treatment. The girls’ health
reportedly improved significantly.

Social workers charged Hoerger with child abuse and removed the girls from
her custody.

Since Montero’s articles, similar stories have emerged through the BBC and
elsewhere. One child, identified only as Garfield, was removed from his
grandmother’s care when she stopped giving him drugs that seemed to make
him ill. According to the news site Black Britain, Garfield was then
placed with a foster mother who "receives $2000 per month to look after
him, because she is prepared to give him the medication."

Black Britain hurls the added indictment of racism at ACS because the vast
majority of the HIV-positive children are black, like Garfield, or
Hispanic.

The second basic charge leveled by the BBC is that the administered drugs
harm rather than help the children.

Dr. David Rasnick, an expert on AIDS drugs, offers a heartbreaking
description of what the children might suffer.

"We're talking about serious, serious side-effects. These children are
going to be absolutely miserable. They're going to have cramps, diarrhoea
and their joints are going to swell up. They're going to roll around the
ground and you can't touch them." Dr Rasnick called some of the drug
combinations "lethal" and further observed, "The young are not completely
developed yet. The immune system isn't completely mature until a person's
in their teens."

It is difficult for a layperson to evaluate medical claims of harm.

The difficulty is increased by the silence rather than answers offered by
ACS, the drug manufacturers and those who conducted the trials.

Advocates such as Michael Weinstein, President of AIDS Healthcare
Foundation (the largest AIDS organization in the United States), have
called for disclosure. He writes, "These are very serious allegations and
we will have to wait to see the facts play out…GSK is being accused of
exploiting one of our most vulnerable populations."

In an atmosphere of secrecy, the worst scenarios assume credibility. Vera
Sharav, President of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, comments,
"there appears to be a policy of giving drug firms access to them [the
children]."

If the facts are to "play out" and the worst is not seem credible, then
ACS needs to act in an uncharacteristic manner and respond to public
concern.

The ACS is one of the most powerful child welfare agencies in North
America. The BBC observed, "The ACS, as it is known, was granted
far-reaching powers in the 1990s by…Mayor Rudi Giuliani, after a
particularly horrific child killing."

An example of that power: the ACS does not require a court order to place
HIV children in foster care and on drug trials.

According to family lawyer David Lansner, "They’re essentially out of
control. I’ve had many ACS case workers tell me: ‘We’re ACS, we can do
whatever we want’ and they usually get away with it."

If the ACS has respected parental and guardian rights, then its files
should document the fact. If the ACS has honored laws that require
potential benefits to children in medical trials to outweigh risks, then
records are the proof.

Power without accountability is an invitation for abuse. Nothing short of
transparency will make the hideous accusations raised by "Guinea Pig Kids"
go away.

Wendy McElroy is the editor of ifeminists.com and a research fellow for
The Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif. She is the author and editor
of many books and articles, including the new book, "Liberty for Women:
Freedom and Feminism in the 21st Century" (Ivan R. Dee/Independent
Institute, 2002). She lives with her husband in Canada.

Respond to the Writer
wendy@ifeminists.net
CC to

views@foxnews.com

PLEASE THANK THEM FOR RUNNING THIS STORY AND ASK FOR MORE
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.