Here I quote things Paul says in some of his articles, and point out
contradictions and evasions.  (Paul King's words are indented.)

   The proportion of patients prescribed HAART increased from 19%
   during the first half of 1996 to 68% in the first half of 1999.
   [5]

So HAART usage reached 19% in the first half of 1996.

   as late as 1997 only 19% of 'AIDS' patients in America were
   on HAART.  [4]

   HAART was only in 19% use at the time of the decline showed by
   Mr. Canzi's distorted figures [2]

Now Paul applies the 19% figure from the first half of 1996 to 1997
without any justification.

   The proportion of patients receiving HAART changed significantly
   over the course of VATS.  In January 1996, only 1% of 83 active
   patients were taking HAART. This proportion increased to 52%
   on 1 January 1997, [3]

Based on this, HAART usage climbed from 19% to 52% in the second half
of 1996.  So HAART usage was high enough in 1996 to shoot down Paul's
arguments that HAART was not being used by enough people to account
for the observed decline in mortality in 1996 and 1997.

   HAART was not in wide spread use until at least 1998.  [1]

52% at the end of 1996, but not widespread until 1998.  Uh huh.

   "11% will make a great difference" [7]

Paul is apparently responding to an article in which I said that 19%
was enough to make a big difference in mortality, but he posted this
reply as a followup to an unrelated article, and magically changed the
percentage to 11%.  He repeated this new 11% figure in other articles:

   11% is 11%. End of story.  [6]

   Even if your assertion was true (it is not) the decline still
   happened when a mere 11% of Americans were first taking HAART.  [8]

It was Paul himself who previously said this:

   HAART was only in 19% use at the time of the decline showed by
   Mr. Canzi's distorted figures [2]

When 19% no longer served his purpose he changed it to 11% and acted as
if it had always been 11%.

Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.

[1] <f224e47e9a5e995be5a8f6f2740fb913@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>
[2] <cd54dc6a357234df1c96378bb46a5628@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>
[3] <70a6c6625ae0b0517001994be92552f4@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>
[4] <648650028c0d3d788df1152c3e7d0bf9@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>
[5] <1cde1f37033db5d96c1c1ac8a6350754@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>
[6] <81fcdab2033a9503b1dde84c8720914f@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>
[7] <6e098f24e45a3f042138b5f10b21ba8f@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>
[8] <5d098c1b51bbe0e388d248f7ab27eda2@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>

Regrettably, Google has broken the ability I once had to make these
references clickable.