This is the story: The world's biggest killer and the greatest cause of
ill-health and suffering across the globe is listed almost at the end of
the International Classification of Diseases. It is given the code Z59.5
-
extreme poverty.
"Poverty is the main reason why babies are not vaccinated, why clean
water
and sanitation are not provided, why curative drugs and other treatments
are unavailable and why mothers die in childbirth. It is the underlying
cause of reduced life expectancy, handicap, disability and starvation.
Poverty is a major contributor to mental illness, stress, suicide, family
disintegration and substance abuse. Every year in the developing world
12.2 million children under 5 years die, most of them from causes which
could be prevented for just a few US cents per child. They die largely
because of world indifference, but most of all they die because they are
poor.
"Beneath the heartening facts about decreased mortality and increasing
life expectancy, and many other undoubted health advances, lie
unacceptable disparities in wealth. The gaps between rich and poor,
between one population group and another, between ages and between sexes,
are widening. For most people in the world today every step of life, from
infancy to old age, is taken under the twin shadows of poverty and
inequity, and under the double burden of suffering and disease.
"For many, the prospect of longer life may seem more like a punishment
than a gift. Yet by the end of the century we could be living in a world
without poliomyelitis, a world without new cases of leprosy, a world
without deaths from neonatal tetanus and measles. But today the money
that
some developing countries have to spend per person on health care over an
entire year is just US $4, less than the amount of small change carried
in
the pockets and purses of many people in the developed countries.
"A person in one of the least developed countries in the world has a life
expectancy of 43 years according to 1993 calculations. A person in one of
the most developed countries has a life expectancy of 78, a difference of
more than a third of a century. This means a rich, healthy man can live
twice as long as a poor, sick man...
"HIV and AIDS are having a devastating effect on young people.
"In many countries in the developing world, up to two-thirds of all new
infections are among people aged 15-24. Overall it is estimated that half
the global HIV infections have been in people under 25 years with 60% of
infections of females occurring by the age of 20. Thus the hopes and
lives
of a generation, the breadwinners, providers and parents of the future,
are in jeopardy."
Because he said all these things, it was said that hundreds of delegates
walked out on President Mbeki!
They also walked out because there were two things he did not say. One of
these was that he did not say that HIV causes AIDS! The other was that he
did not say that HIV/AIDS is the single greatest threat to the survival
of
the peoples of sub-Saharan Africa!
Instead, he concluded his address with the words:
"The world's biggest killer and the greatest cause of ill health and
suffering across the globe, including South Africa, is extreme poverty.
"Is there more that all of us should do together, assuming that in a
world
driven by a value system based on financial profit and individual
material
reward, the notion of human solidarity remains a valid precept governing
human behaviour! On behalf of our government and people, I wish the 13th
International AIDS Conference success, confident that you have come to
these African shores as messengers of hope and hopeful that when you
conclude your important work, we, as Africans, will be able to say that
you who came to this city, which occupies a fond place in our hearts,
came
here because you care. Thank you for your attention."
Offended both by what he said and what he did not say, reportedly
hundreds
of delegates who undoubtedly consider themselves to be friends of the
Africans, walked out on the President.
The great puzzle is why these friends of the Africans found the truth, as
told by the WHO, so unpalatable. Medical science everywhere in the world
recognises the central importance of diseases of poverty.
As we will demonstrate later, even the most highly developed countries in
the world are themselves involved in a struggle against diseases of
poverty within their own borders.
For some strange reason, Africa, among the poorest continents of the
world, is not supposed to talk about these diseases of poverty and to
focus on their eradication. We are urged from all sides to break the
silence about HIV/AIDS and maintain perfect silence about the diseases of
poverty.
To what do we owe these strange goings-on!
The war to defeat AIDS is also a war to defeat the humiliation and
dehumanisation of the African people.
This humiliation and dehumanisation 'is not a pretty thing when you look
into it too much.'
When the humiliated and dehumanised speak of it too much, some friends of
the African judge such conversation as not being a pretty thing.
Discussion then becomes impossible.
The war to defeat AIDS is a difficult struggle because it is not only a
struggle against the conditions that produce ill health and unnecessary
death among millions of Africans, challenging as this struggle is.
It is a difficult struggle also because it has to be waged against some
friends of the African, who find that the truth is not a pretty thing.
Asserting that they stand on irrefutable scientific knowledge, these
particular friends of the Africans, and the Africans themselves, are
horrified beyond measure that the Africans will perish, consumed by an
HIV/AIDS pandemic which is sweeping across the face of Sub-Saharan
Africa.
Statistics are produced regularly to show rapidly growing HIV infections
and rapidly growing deaths from HIV/AIDS on our continent.
Our friends claim that millions of Africans, in increasing numbers, are
infected with a highly mutant and indestructible Human Immunodeficiency
Virus. They say that this HI Virus is communicated from person to person
through heterosexual intercourse and from mother to child.
To stop the spread of the Virus, they say that the Africans should
abstain
from sexual intercourse or use condoms.
They also say that HIV-positive mothers should be given drugs to stop the
transmission of the Virus. Their babies, too, should be given the same
drugs, presumably to kill the Virus if the mother has nevertheless
transmitted it.
They urge that in the event of rape, the victims should also be given
drugs, in case the rapist/s is or are carriers of the HI Virus.
They argue that all the above conforms, unequivocally, to the best
available scientific knowledge. It is therefore unquestionable.
Diagnosis,
prevention and treatment are all based on immutable scientific truths
that
were agreed by the global scientific community 20 years ago.
It is then said that to question any of the above, or to ask any
questions
whatsoever, is to commit the sacrilege of questioning science itself and
take on the guilt of the perpetration of the high crime of genocide.
The message is simple to understand and communicate. If it moves – clothe
it in a condom! If it was naked – destroy its diseased emission with
drugs!
The message is also simple in another way. The assertion is made that
scientific discoveries about HIV and AIDS were proclaimed two decades
ago.
At the moment of the proclamation, the science of AIDS came to a
standstill. It was frozen at this particular moment into an
unquestionable
and unchangeable monument to scientific thought.
Accordingly, further scientific inquiry into this matter is
impermissible.
Such scientific knowledge as was possible two decades ago must be
supported by all and sundry, including scientists, as part of a religious
dogma. Accordingly, to establish his or her credentials, everybody must
answer the ballad question – do you believe that HIV causes AIDS! Belief
about a scientific matter, and not empirical evidence, thus becomes the
criterion of truth.
In his book, "Eros & Civilisation", (Sphere Books, London: 1970), Herbert
Marcuse wrote of our epoch as "a period when the omnipotent apparatus
punishes real non-conformity with ridicule and defeat... "
And so it has come to pass that anybody who has dared to question any of
the above allegedly established scientific truths, has been confronted by
this omnipotent apparatus. Accordingly, it has punished non-conformity
with ridicule, defeat and worse.
Elsewhere in the same book, Marcuse writes:
"The primal father, as the archetype of domination, initiates the chain
reaction of enslavement, rebellion, and reinforced domination which marks
the history of civilisation. But ever since the first, prehistoric
restoration of domination following the first rebellion, repression from
without has been supported by repression from within, the unfree
individual introjects his masters and their commands into his own mental
apparatus. The struggle against freedom reproduces itself in the psyche
of
man, as the self-repression of the repressed individual, and his
self-repression in turn sustains his masters and their institutions."(Our
emphases).
In our case, it would seem that this is precisely what the "omnipotent
apparatus" has achieved. The defeat and repression of the non-conformists
is sustained by repression from within. The unfree individuals, the
Africans, have introjected their masters and the commands of the masters
into their own mental apparatus. Thus do they sustain their masters,
their
ideas and their institutions.
In his 'Political Preface 1966' to this book, Herbert Marcuse says:
"The people, efficiently manipulated and organised, are free; ignorance
and impotence, introjected heteronomy (the internalisation by the
'unfree'
as the true exercise of individual autonomy of the practice of seeming to
make an independent determination of choices, which are, in reality,
pre-determined by another – Our annotation) is the price of their
freedom."
He goes on to say:
"What started as subjection by force soon became 'voluntary servitude',
collaboration in reproducing a society which made servitude increasingly
rewarding and palatable... Today, this union of freedom and servitude has
become 'natural' and a vehicle of progress."
Mark Twain put this differently when he said the 'all the human race
loves
a lord... In the Jardin des Plantes I have seen a cat that was so vain of
being the personal friend of an elephant that I was ashamed of her.'