AIDS doomsayers have fallen on hard times.
Just six years ago, the nation's
top health official, Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala,
declared that after the epidemic there might not be "any Americans left."
In fact, AIDS cases decreased from approximately 60,000 in 1997 to about
48,000 in 1998, according to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention in Atlanta (CDC), a 20 percent drop.
That number is 42 percent below the 1995 peak of approximately 68,000.
AIDS-related deaths plummeted from about 50,000 in both 1994 and 1995 to
only 20,000 in 1998. Five years ago, AIDS was the eighth greatest killer
of Americans; now, it no longer makes the top fifteen list.
But to paraphrase the newspaper editor in The Man Who Shot Liberty
Valance, when the truth conflicts with the legend, AIDS activists
brazenly
print the legend. In September 1999, for example, Health Care Manager
reported on the "dynamic growth in reported AIDS cases of heterosexual
transmission." Its source?
An obscure publication dated 1992. (Actually, new
heterosexual-transmission cases have been steadily dropping.)
That same month, Clinton administration AIDS "Czar" (Czarina?) Sandra
Thurman declared, "We're at the beginning of an epidemic, not the end of
an epidemic, with no vaccine, no cure." There are few diseases for which
we have vaccines, and many for which there is no cure, but this has
nothing to do with their epidemic status.
For the most part, the alarmists have simply moved from citing solid data
to using estimates and from using U.S. figures to citing worldwide ones,
all of which are estimates. According to a CDC study cited last August in
the New York Times, "The rate of infection with the AIDS virus in the
United States is no longer declining." Yet CDC infection rates have never
been anything but guesses. For the last several years, the agency has
held
to a nice round, unsubstantiated guess of 40,000 per year.
According to Miss America 1998 Kate Shindle, "Two American teenagers
every
hour ages 13 to 21" contract the AIDS virus. Teenagers age 13-21?
Another example: Kate Shindle, Miss America 1998 and an AIDS crusader,
"notes that two American teens contract HIV each hour and generally
demonstrates her mastery of AIDS statistics and jargon," says USA Today.
"Notes" implies that her assertion is a fact. Shindle gave the same
figure
during a CNN interview. Asked if the number were national or worldwide,
she replied that, um, she wasn't sure, but "the statistic that I heard is
two American teenagers every hour, ages thirteen to twenty-one."
Unfortunately, she has no solid data on infections overall nor on
specific
groups such as teenagers, including the nonexistent twenty- and
twenty-one-year-old ones. (And the media lionize her as a beauty queen
with a brain!) The hard data are that teen AIDS cases are declining; in
1998 there were all of 297.
What of all the talk about the growing world AIDS problem? Here too we've
seen a conscious shift from hard data to soft and from actual cases to
estimates of cases or, shakier still, estimates of infections. Warning
against complacency, a November 1999 Washington Post editorial began,
"Many Americans have a sense that AIDS has been defeated, or at least
fought to a draw." It later adds, "One statistic should be enough to undo
that impression: This year 5.6 million people will be newly infected with
HIV, the virus that inevitably leads to the fatal disease."
Not until a couple of paragraphs later, reading between the lines, do we
find that the figure is for all cases worldwide. Moreover, we are never
told that the number is only an estimate.
Invoking a dubious worldwide pandemic to postulate a U.S. epidemic makes
as much sense as asserting that Americans must not be suffering an
obesity
problem because many Sudanese teeter on the edge of starvation. It's a
pathetic attempt at misdirection, but media outlets willfully pass it
along as if it were fact
Then there are the outright lies. The following, for example, appeared in
the December 1, 1999, Washington Post: "The number of new [AIDS] cases
among women, minorities, teenagers, and the elderly continues to rise."
Wrong on all counts: from 1997 to 1998, teen cases fell from 401 to 297,
female cases from 13,105 to 10,998, nonwhite cases from 40,027 to 31,826,
and cases among those sixty-five and older from 881 to 844.
It's not that the Post didn't do its homework. Its dogma ate it.
David Canzi -- non-mailable address - 03 Dec 2004 06:44 GMT
>AIDS doomsayers have fallen on hard times.
>
>Just six years ago, the nation's
>top health official, Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala,
>declared that after the epidemic there might not be "any Americans left."
[snip]
>AIDS-related deaths plummeted from about 50,000 in both 1994 and 1995 to
>only 20,000 in 1998. Five years ago, AIDS was the eighth greatest killer
>of Americans; now, it no longer makes the top fifteen list.
I can just imagine the embarrassed health officials talking about
this fiasco over lunch: "We buggered up our predictions by introducing
protease inhibitors that caused mortality rates to drop spectacularly.
Damn! We should've left well-enough alone."

Signature
David Canzi
Gooserider - 03 Dec 2004 11:35 GMT
> >AIDS doomsayers have fallen on hard times.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> protease inhibitors that caused mortality rates to drop spectacularly.
> Damn! We should've left well-enough alone."
That's quite all right. The increased use of medications to treat HIV/AIDS
guarantees the eventual resistance of the virus to said meds.
Death - 03 Dec 2004 15:20 GMT
"David Canzi -- non-mailable address" <dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca>
wrote in message
> I can just imagine the embarrassed health officials talking about
> this fiasco over lunch: "We buggered up our predictions by introducing
> protease inhibitors that caused mortality rates to drop spectacularly.
> Damn! We should've left well-enough alone."
LOL
Gary Stein - 04 Dec 2004 16:13 GMT
Gee Paul for the last few weeks you've been claiming that AIDS
deaths/incidence (you are never clear about which of the two you are talking
about) started to decline in 1992. Yet in this post you admit what we have
been telling you all along.
AIDS cases reported per year peaked in 1997 then declined from then on. AIDS
deaths peaked in 1995 then started to decline in 1996 reaching there lowest
yearly number in 1998.
What gives Paul either you have been lying for the past several weeks or you
are lying in this post? Are you just to stupid to keep track of what you
post and not aware that you've blundered by posting this message or have you
given up your old lie about the year 1992 being the first year AIDS deaths
declined?
Gary Stein
> AIDS doomsayers have fallen on hard times.
>
[quoted text clipped - 79 lines]
> and cases among those sixty-five and older from 881 to 844.
> It's not that the Post didn't do its homework. Its dogma ate it.