You are writing this??? Or copying someone else? I guess that means
you are on *that* side of the split denialist land of cognitive
dissonance: the Duesberg denialism that recognizes that HIV exists.

Well, bully for you dearie. Now that you've gotten that far, you can
see that it is a transmissible virus. Start to look at modes of
transmission, cellular factors involved in establishment of infection,
correlates of immunity, sanctuary sites of viral replication,
quiescent CD4+ cells, the role of the Th1 -> Th2 switch, CCR5 vs.
CXCR4 HIV variants, the role of antigen presenting cells, particularly
dendritic cells and macrophages, the lymph node architecture over
time, the ways apoptosis arises, the damage to gut functions and the
subsequent decline in micronutrient status (including selenium,
magnesium, B12, carotenoids, zinc, thiamine, riboflavin, etc.) and
golly, you might actually begin to get an idea.

HIV causes AIDS on its own, just fine. No other infections are needed.
However, the PRESENCE of other infections like Pneumocystis,
tuberculosis, syphilis as latent infections means these may likely
arise when the immune system is dysregulated by the direct and
indirect effects of HIV. Susceptibility to de novo infections also
increases dramatically as the CD4 count drops below 100 and then more
below 50.

That's why David Pasquarelli died. Not because HIV needs a co-factor.
Not because ARV causes AIDS--the drugs don't though they certainly
cause other problems. Not because he might have worn a condom once.
But because HIV exists and causes AIDS.

It certainly doesn't matter in the slightest whether you believe me or
not. If you become HIV infected and don't bother to treat it -- or are
unable to -- you will discover these truths for yourself.

        George M. Carter

A true Orwellian conspiracy on a huge social scale.

What they will do next is entirely predictable.

Blackie

Big Bertha Thing spider (see below)

Big Bertha Thing Probe-B

In the Sunday Telegraph of 11th April 2004, the QED section, gave the story of
the Gravity Probe-B satellite launch. This is expected to prove the existence of
a new force of nature, proposed by Einstein.

Free Press Pack Download (11MB PDF)
http://www.gravityprobeb.com/gpb_presskit.pdf

There are one or two problems with this:-
1. Einstein never proposed this new force of nature. (Funding canard)
2. It is a magnetic force directly proportional to angular momentum. (Memomagnetism)
3. It is weak at Newtonian speeds and strong at near light speeds.
4. The big three in gyroscopes are Einstein, Professor Francis Everitt of
     Stanford University and Harold Crabtree M.A.
5. One wrote the definitive book on the subject and the other two read it.
6. The relevant extract from the book is given below. (Spider published 4th March 1998)
7. They do not credit the costermonger, with the definitive experiment,
     which proves the existence of the new force of nature.
8. They do not accept that the novelty item was a valid experiment.
9. They believe that the spider wheel was magnetized.
10. The costermonger did not magnetize the spider wheel, he exploited a force of nature.
11. The costermonger discovered, applied and sold the first working application.
12. There is an eye-witness account from 1850 by the author, which kindled his
     life-long interest.
13. The description was published in 1909, in the same book.
14. The force of nature has been missing for 150 years, since its discovery.
15. The first modern publication on the subject is spider, on 4th March 1998. (Usenet)
16. Attribution and due credit are two of the failings of modern science.

Big Bertha Thing spider  
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/spider.html
Access page JPG 11K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.cycling

Drawing of a clockwork spider wheel and hairpin.

Extract from Introductory Chapter;-
The "Spider tops," which are frequently sold in the streets of London,
consist of a heavy little disc mounted on a spindle (Fig. XIV.).
When the disc has been set spinning a small curved piece of
metal is placed to touch the toe, and at once begins to slide round it,
first the side (a) in the figure, and then the side (b),
the motion continuing backwards and forwards till the top comes to rest.
The fact is that the toe is magnetic, and this being the case it is easy
to see that the rolling of the toe on the side of the metal produces
the motion.

From the book
An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of
Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion.
By Harold Crabtree M.A.
Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge
Assistant Master at Charterhouse
Longmans, Green and Co. 1923
First Edition 1909
Second Edition 1914
New Impression 1923
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

Big Bertha Thing fact

Anything but a fact, changes the face of twentieth century science.
1. No iron moons and planetary cores.
2. No red shift measure of speed.
3. No Patrick Moore star at 95% the speed of light.
4. Muons arrive on earth.
5. Relativity is like an imaginary number; useful but not real.
6. Einstein-Haas gives a field strength 1/10000th the electric field.
7. Wave particle duality is a field effect.
8. Schroedinger is an approximation.

Who has the wit to check the fact?

Thank you,
Tony Lance
tonylance@inspiron.co.uk