 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / November 2004If you were ill with a sexually transmitted infection, how would you want your doctor to diagnose and care for you?
If you were ill with a sexually transmitted infection, how would you want your doctor to diagnose and care for you? Correctly. If the syndrome had nothing to do with sex, I sure would not want him to treat it as an std nor would I want him to prescribely deadly medications based on a flawed hypothesis. Doctors kill over 300,000 Americans a year according to official statictic, by 'mistake'. I believe the true figure may be five times higher, making a visit to the doctor a highly risky proposition. a. What would consider to be correctly?... if you were ill with a sexually transmitted infection. b. How would you want your doctor to diagnose it if you had a sexually transmitted infection?... c. What steps would you want the doctor to take in caring for you?... > Correctly. If the syndrome had nothing to do with sex, I sure would not > want him to treat it as an std nor would I want him to prescribely deadly > medications based on a flawed hypothesis. If you were ill with a sexually transmitted infection, how would you want your doctor to diagnose and care for you? a. What would you consider to be correct?... if you were ill with a sexually transmitted infection. b. How would you want your doctor to diagnose it if you had a sexually transmitted infection?... c. What steps would you want the doctor to take in caring for you?... > Correctly. If the syndrome had nothing to do with sex, I sure would not > want him to treat it as an std nor would I want him to prescribely deadly > medications based on a flawed hypothesis. If you were ill with a sexually transmitted infection, how would you want your doctor to diagnose and care for you? Correctly. The trouble is knowing what that is in any particular situation. Clearly it is not killing you with medications only to discover the condition was not what you thought. a. What do you believe to be correct?... if your partner were ill with a sexually transmitted infection. Please give an example or examples of what exactly you believe to be meant by correctly... b. How would you want your doctor to detect infection if your partner had a sexually transmitted infection?... c. How would you want your doctor to make a diagnosis?... if your partner had a sexually transmitted infection?... c. What steps would you want the doctor to take in caring for your partner?... > Correctly. > The trouble is knowing what that is in any particular situation. > Clearly it is not killing you with medications only to discover the > condition was not what you thought. correct http://m-w.com 1 : conforming to an approved or conventional standard 2 : conforming to or agreeing with fact, logic, or known truth > Correctly. If the syndrome had nothing to do with sex, I sure would not > want him to treat it as an std nor would I want him to prescribely deadly > medications based on a flawed hypothesis. If you were ill with a sexually transmitted infection, how would you want your doctor to diagnose and care for you? "1 : conforming to an approved or conventional standard" Except what is excepted one day is known as a myth the next. Leaches for example. You keep repeating the same silly question. How about a response to the reply? >You keep repeating the same silly question. > >How about a response to the reply? Perhaps he's hoping to start a civil conversation with somebody who finds his question intersting, and some rude jackass who doesn't care about the question keeps following up with captious non-answers. David Pasquarelli probably believed to the day he died that people hated him because of his beliefs, and not because he was an aggressive a.shole. You seem to be determined to walk in his footsteps.  SignatureDavid Canzi On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:31:05 +0000 (UTC), dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi -- non-mailable address) wrote: >>You keep repeating the same silly question. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >hated him because of his beliefs, and not because he was an aggressive >a.shole. Canzi Pants didn't know David Pasquarelli. I knew him for many years to be a sweet wonderful and selfless person. As to who the "aggressive a.shole" would be, perhaps Canzi Pants needs to heed Shakespeare: "... the lady doth protest too much" Blackie > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:31:05 +0000 (UTC), > dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi -- non-mailable address) [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Canzi Pants didn't know David Pasquarelli. I knew him for many years > to be a sweet wonderful and selfless person. Sure you did Frod. If you don't call his tatics aggressive then we know that your moral compass has been out of order for years and your just confirming that for us once again. Gary Stein >> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:31:05 +0000 (UTC), >> dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi -- non-mailable address) >> wrote: >>>David Pasquarelli probably believed to the day he died that people >>>hated him because of his beliefs, and not because he was an aggressive [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > If you don't call his tatics aggressive I never said he wasn't aggressive. > then we know that your moral compass has been out of order for years "Moral compass"? More Public Relationspeak by Mr. Drug Company Misinformation Boiler Room himself, Gary Swine! And gee, just think it was so many years ago that Mr. Swine purported to be on his deathbed with AIDS - and resurrected by the HAART Cocktails that only seemed to have only spared Mr. Swine. Today's Standard of Care proves that! Better luck next time, Mssr. Swine. Blackie >On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:31:05 +0000 (UTC), >dmcanzi@remulak.ads.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi -- non-mailable address) [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Canzi Pants didn't know David Pasquarelli. I knew him for many years >to be a sweet wonderful and selfless person. I don't think you know how to tell if somebody is an a.shole, because if you did you would have to face a terrible truth. SignatureDavid Canzi >If you were ill with a sexually transmitted infection, >how would you want your doctor to diagnose and care for you? I would want my doctor to treat and cure the infection. I damn sure wouldn't expect my doctor to prescribe toxic cancer drugs in order to lower a count for a phony virus test that has no correspondence to better health or prevention of transmission. What the f.ck is the matter with you? Blackie |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.