More Evidence Showing AIDS Drugs Harm Healthy People

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

PaulKing - 29 Oct 2004 22:40 GMT

More Evidence Showing AIDS Drugs
Harm Healthy People

HIV Medicine, another orthodox AIDS publication, recently printed a paper
that found "significant adverse effects" in two-thirds of healthy people
who take AIDS meds as a precaution following potential exposure to HIV.

The article describes "severe and life-threatening effects such as liver
failure" occuring after less than a month of treatment with nevirapine
(also known as Viramune) and one case of multiorgan failure after just a
few days of AZT taken in combination with 3TC.

At no point does the article mention that the assumed benefits of
so-called post exposure prophylaxis (a 28 day regimen of AIDS drugs
following a suspected exposure) have never been validated by comparing the
outcomes of potentially exposed health care workers who take the drugs
with similarly exposed workers who do not.

Reply to this Message

Shoko Asahara - 30 Oct 2004 02:16 GMT

"PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote...

> More Evidence Showing AIDS Drugs
> Harm Healthy People
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> outcomes of potentially exposed health care workers who take the drugs
> with similarly exposed workers who do not.

Well let's see... I think most people who were exposed to HIV would want
to take the risk of possible organ damage from the high-dose emergency
treatment that stands a chance of preventing the virus from taking hold,
rather than go untreated and stand a good chance of having the virus
take hold and causing the most horrible and disgusting death. There is
probably a period of up to 48 hours in which the virus can be stopped
with drugs, after which the virus enters the "memory" immune system cells
and becomes impossible to eradicate. A person can choose to risk organ
damage from drug therapy for an HIV exposure that might not infect if
left untreated, but if the exposure is untreated and the virus does infect,
the person will then suffer organ damage from the decades of anti-viral
drugs he will have to take for the rest of his life. You are a lunatic.

Reply to this Message

PaulKing - 30 Oct 2004 08:43 GMT

That could true, possibly, if you believe HIV is a deadly virus. If it is
benign or not even a virus you have just killed yourself for no good
reason.

Even if HIV/AIDS is real, the odds of becoming a HLTS
(long tern surviver) are actually much better 'meds' free.

What references?

Reply to this Message