 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / October 2004WHAT'S WRONG WITH CONDOMS?
WHAT'S WRONG WITH CONDOMS? The medical hole in the "safe sex" argument! Natural holes are present in latex up to 5 microns wide - holes 50 times bigger than the AIDs virus, larger than STDs and even sperm. In 1992 a Food and Drug Administration study showed detectable leakage of HIV-sized particles in one-third of all condoms tested. The "failure rate" is 2.5% breakage -13-15% of women whose partners use condoms alone fall pregnant in one year - HIV particles are much smaller than sperm -that's like playing russian roulette with your health! The Truth about Condoms joint medical statement.On Friday, July 20,2001 the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released an official government document detailing the research on condom effectiveness. STD Condom Effectiveness HIV Relative risk = .15 Gonorrhea Women — No clinical proof of effectiveness Men — Some effectiveness Chlamydia No clinical proof of effectiveness Trichomoniasis No clinical proof of effectiveness Syphilis No clinical proof of effectiveness Genital Herpes No clinical proof of effectiveness Human Papillomavirus No clinical proof of effectiveness Condoms used for vaginal intercourse result in a 14% pregnancy rate per year of "typical" use. >WHAT'S WRONG WITH CONDOMS? > >The medical hole in the "safe sex" argument! Natural holes are present in >latex up to 5 microns wide - holes 50 times bigger than the AIDs virus, >larger than STDs and even sperm. Oh bullshit. Fill it with air. How big is an air molecule? This sounds like Cardinal Trujillo's crazy blitherings. George M. Carter Every study and report you don't like is a 'right wing plot' to discredit condoms. The fact that study after study has showed that condoms simply don't work has no effect on you. You dismiss the US Navel Institute, Mariposa Institute, Jones and Forrest and Texas University studies as the work of the Pope. You don't even except that the CDC that has now backed down COMPLETELY on it's absurd claim that comdoms are protection. You believe with the blindness of a religious fanatic. An 'AIDS' religion fanatic is EXACTLY what you are. "In condoms we trust" - GM Carter >Every study and report you don't like is a 'right wing plot' to discredit >condoms. Nonsense yet again. It's just stupidity is what it is. To talk about relative sizes of holes and HIV is to make a mockery of science because it is just so STUPID. Surface tension? Electrostatic forces? Etc. Other elements come into play that are ignored to promote hysteria. Second, there are ample data showing that correct and consistent use of condoms will DRAMATICALLY reduce the risk of a variety of infections, including and especially HIV. That's the real test. George M. Carter "there are ample data" No there is not as you well know. GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> wrote: > there are ample data showing that correct and consistent use > of condoms will DRAMATICALLY reduce the risk of a variety of > infections, including and especially HIV. That's the real test. > > George M. Carter There are also ample data showing that "correct and consistent use of condoms" by any significant proportion of the population is so rare that it is virtually non-existent. So it really doesn't matter all that much how 'effective' they are, does it? So the US Naval Research Institute is a catholic front group. The Pope really does have power. The Vatican Guard now includes the US Navy if you are to be believed. An improvement on those men in funny uniforms they had in the past! Do you enjoying making a fool of yourself? You must as you work so hard at it. THE FLAWED CONDOM Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) researchers, using powerful electron microscopes, have found that new latex, from which condoms are fabricated, contains "maximum inherent flaw[s]" (that is, holes) 70 microns in diameter. (9) These holes are 700 times larger than the HIV-1 virus. There are pores in latex, and some of the pores are large enough to pass sperm-sized particles. Carey, et al., observed leakage of HIV-sized particles through 33%+ of the latex condoms tested. In addition, as Gordon points out in his review, the testing procedures for condoms are less than desirable. United States condom manufacturers are allowed 0.4% leaky condoms (AQL). Gordon states, "The fluctuations in sampling permits many batches not meeting AQL to be sold." In the United States, 12% of domestic and 21% of imported batches of condoms have failed to meet the 0.4% AQL. (10) 9."Anomalous Fatigue Behavior in Polysoprene," Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Vol. 62, #4, Sep.-Oct. 1989. 10.Collart, David G., M.D., loc. cit. THE SPERM VS. THE AIDS VIRUS A paper in the February 1992 issue of Applied and Environmental Microbiology reports that filtration techniques show the HIV-1 virus to be 0.1 micron (4 millionths of an inch) in diameter. It is three times smaller than the herpes virus, 60 times smaller than the syphilis spirochete, and 50 to 450 times smaller than sperm. (8) 8.Lytle, C. D., et al., "Filtration Sizes of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Surrogate Viruses Used to Test Barrier Materials," Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 58, #2, Feb. 1992. >So the US Naval Research Institute is a catholic front group. The Pope >really does have power. Who is this group? >9."Anomalous Fatigue Behavior in Polysoprene," Rubber Chemistry and >Technology, Vol. 62, #4, Sep.-Oct. 1989. Where is this paper? Who is this group? The US Navy? So what there are holes in condoms? It doesn't matter. There are holes in a tabletop. There are holes in your head. Holes are everywhere. There are huge gaps between the electron cloud and the nucleus. It's a factoid. George M. Carter "Where is this paper? Who is this group? The US Navy?" "Anomalous Fatigue Behavior in Polysoprene," Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Vol. 62, #4, Sep.-Oct. 1989. Can't you read? "Who is this group?" Never heard of the US Navy? Idiot. >"Where is this paper? Who is this group? The US Navy?" > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Never heard of the US Navy? Even Bolivia has a navy. There is nothing in the citation that states what Navy. Besides, I do not trust your interpretation of what that paper says. You have a demonstrated capacity to distort and lie outright to support your desire to screw without a condom and pretend HIV is not a problem. You're as deluded as George W. Bush and his administration!! George M. Carter |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.